Well I can't post it here. It's a word to describe a female that is the same name that was used in WWII to describe the flat had worn by service men (US)
> Well I can't post it here. It's a word to describe a female that is > the same name that was used in WWII to describe the flat had worn by > service men (US)
> On Jul 30, 12:53 am, webado wrote:
> > Oh. do tell, what did you get, Dori? I'm now itching to know ;)
> > On Jul 29, 12:56 pm, djc wrote:
> > > ...the capacha I just received was naughty, naughty, naughty- Hide quoted text -
> Well I can't post it here. It's a word to describe a female that is > the same name that was used in WWII to describe the flat had worn by > service men (US)
> On Jul 30, 12:53 am, webado wrote:
> > Oh. do tell, what did you get, Dori? I'm now itching to know ;)
> > On Jul 29, 12:56 pm, djc wrote:
> > > ...the capacha I just received was naughty, naughty, naughty- Hide quoted text -
> > Well I can't post it here. It's a word to describe a female that is > > the same name that was used in WWII to describe the flat had worn by > > service men (US)
> > On Jul 30, 12:53 am, webado wrote:
> > > Oh. do tell, what did you get, Dori? I'm now itching to know ;)
> > > On Jul 29, 12:56 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > ...the capacha I just received was naughty, naughty, naughty- Hide quoted text -
> Hmm... semantic CAPTCHA .... semantic web .... ;)
> On Jul 30, 11:10 am, djc wrote:
> > flat hat that is
> > On Jul 30, 9:57 am, djc wrote:
> > > Well I can't post it here. It's a word to describe a female that is > > > the same name that was used in WWII to describe the flat had worn by > > > service men (US)
> > > On Jul 30, 12:53 am, webado wrote:
> > > > Oh. do tell, what did you get, Dori? I'm now itching to know ;)
> > > > On Jul 29, 12:56 pm, djc wrote:
> > > > > ...the capacha I just received was naughty, naughty, naughty- Hide quoted text -
John, those for comments on your blog remind me of the mandatory "aptitude" question we have on some scratch cards in order to claim your prize.
Lasr night I was playing tag with a CAPTCHA on a site where I was trying to order something. At the end of the from was the CAPTCHA, a simple arithmetic question. For some reason I kept missing some fields in the form so it would get rejected (too smart for its own good, it checks the EXACT spelling of my city name which is long and hyphenated, and the street name, which needs the street or avenue or whatever designation we never use, according to how the post office has them). I'd fix the field indicated as wrong and it would be rejected for my earlier CAPTCHA answer which got lef tbehind as I'd not noticed it had changed. I'd fix that and it would get rejected again for some other field I didn't fill out correctly. Uphill barefoot in the snow both ways LOL The silly thing would not process the validation of the form fields until the CAPTCHA was OK, adn then woudl only spit out one error at a time. Seems to me ... oh, never mind LOL
