As long as Page Rank is the Holy Grail of how a site is indexed and
that the life of the site is rested upon such technology. That given
the inherent rules and nature of creating and setting such rules to
abide by to begin with it also creates rules that fail to observe
changes. Wouldn't it therefore seem reasonable and fair to restore
page rank from a site after it has been stripped away?

Every concern and technicality of how a site evolves from one host to
another, server sources and all the rest.... That an ecommerce site
may well change platforms just as a software company might introduce
something new. It is always to this degree that a new dynamic web can
be attained. Yet, along the way rules of the road are placed that
diminish the good will intentions of changing to such platforms by
using quark methods to strip page rank and penalize the efforts of
those that trod and carried the load before such control of the net
through search directories could be established to always have it both
ways.

Why is Page Rank ever removed from a site as are its listings when
change occurs?

Reasons are always given. The same reason repeated every time and yet
not once in anyway is there ever any resolve to restore the intrinsic
value a site established before adapting to the next generation of the
web.

“Out” with the “Old” and in with “New” does not weigh the significant
factors of the changes that created this generation of technology to
begin with.

You've been given plenty of reasons why _yours_ was removed and you
don't seem to have addressed a single one of them.

Now sod off and fix your site, there's a good 'un.

It's any and all were removed not just mine.

I don't have or own anyweb site. Never did never will. I've given
examples of ones that I know of.

The suggestion is why ever remove the Page Rank to begin with?

If it does fine,  Only the developers and the SEs are always at odds.

One experience in contrast to working with host services has been
challenging. One blatant example is how Microsoft bCentral services
shut down last year after promising to deliver on improved ecommerce
services. Literally closed down and left all those with hosted
ecomerce sites without service.

They abadoned their customer base and told them to go else where. The
SEs never removed the old URLs to bCentral for months on end.

Not a single customer had any way to remove those URLs or provide a
server redirect as that service as explained by bCentral was never
part of the agreement. That left thousands and thousands of abandoned
URLs to eCommerce shopping carts inherently linked only not directly
linked their "old sites"

301'2, 302's 404 anything was rendered useless.

The root web is still intact. Same titles, descriptions, keywords only
aspx instead of HTML.

The new ecommerce shopping cart items instantly listed at Google
Base.

The images once cataloged on the Google image server, forever
abandoned.

Then months later the new aspx pages, and more new pages to the root
web begin to make an appearance in the SEs.

A year later and pages that are shown as listed are no where to be
seen in the search directory.

On May 9, 11:04 am, Phil Payne wrote: