 |
From: pittsburgh_joe
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:26:20 -0700
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2007 10:26 am
Subject: Re: Making Flash websites accessible, is this okay for SEO?
> Either way, the site in question is still returning one set of URLs to + That's just for deep-linking, google wouldn't be able test query > the search engines and another to users and that is called cloaking. strings mixed with flash anyways. > - The ALT attribute provides "alternative" content and not the DIV + So what if he placed a plainly viewable button (on each page) that > Content in the DIV is hidden from users. could display the text that the flash is in front of (maybe hide the Flash Object)? He couldn't be accused of anything then. > - As you can see Google suggests sIFR and not swfobject! + How is sIFR different from SWFObject? On Jul 11, 3:21 am, beussery wrote: > Instead of saying "self-proclaimed SEO gurus" just be honest, you are
> talking about your post on searchenginewatch.com!http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=18196&page=1&pp=20 > Either way, the site in question is still returning one set of URLs to > - The other set of URLs can be accessed via:http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:K160ysXRpscJ:blitzagency.com/+si... > - The ALT attribute provides "alternative" content and not the DIV > - As you can see Google suggests sIFR and not swfobject!http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/best-uses-of-flash... > I don't know if Google or anyone else for that matter could be any > So, until these issues are fixed I wouldn't expect an answer from > On Jul 9, 2:32 pm, MrGamma wrote: > > Honestly... it's all possible with javascript... javascript has the > > Why encapsulate everything... when you can connect with everyone? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||