 |
From: nick shepherd
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 05:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 29 2007 8:59 am
Subject: Re: XML + XSLT = Good SEO?
It's already been answered from an SEO standpoint but have you also
considered the repercussions of relying on the XSL translations to be done on the client side? Not all browsers support XML / XSLT translations, specifically older versions of Opera. Relying solely on the clients browser for tasks as important as the XSL translation would be for your site isn't necessarily very smart when you have several server side scripting languages that can do the translation themselves and you wouldn't have to worry about depending on the client's browser and you could also still present google with a well formed html page. Nick
On Nov 27, 10:24 pm, Jonathan Dingman wrote:
> We have a few sites that rely heavily upon SEO. We also have a lot of
> sites on our server, so we want to minimize load time and maximize > efficiency. > With those key components in mind, here are some thoughts.
> I've been contacting a well known search expert back and forth.
> The question of: does using XML and XSLT together make for a well
> The XSLT would be processed all on the client-side so the XML would be
> This was their most relevant response:
> "Googlebot will index XML as XML. Google does rank XML pages in the
> So my question here is this: what would be the best way to tackle
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||