> webado wrote:
> > They are thinking to corner the market and have 3 or 4 chips in the
> > game rather than one. Tell them it's an idiotic idea. And that's
> > putting it mildly.
> > Tell them other big companies have been stung by such stupid
> > decisions, they wouldn't be first. They are 5-10 years behind with
> > such shenanigans. Google is deadset against any such crap. There are
> > already too many useless sites, too many duplicates of everything.
> > They are cleaning up left, right and center. What gave them the idea
> > it's a good idea?

> > But if they don't believe it, great, let them shoot themselevs in
> > their feet.
> > It will be sweet to say "I told you so" after that.

> I dont think its so much trying to corner the market with 3 or 4 chips
> because we are talking 3 or 4 products that are related and 3 or 4
> products that have nothing to do with any of the other products. The
> unifying theme is this is "A Master" site "A, B & C" have a related
> product site "X, Y & Z" have a related product and Site "1, 2 & 3"
> Have a related product. So "A Master" is suppose to point to each of
> the sub realms.

> Each of the sub realms should have there own domain in my opinion but
> there are those that say the sub relams Site(ABC) = 1 domain all
> similar content, Site(XYZ)=1 domain similar content.

> While each domain has its own nitch realms ABC, XYZ have similar
> content skewed for specific countries and not much more... ie color
> and colour