> No, not really. I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion.

> I am purely asking if a phrase is repeated across pages, when is it
> considered duplicate? For instance, someone might upload a photo and
> provide a long description to go with that. That photo could
> legitimately be used several places throughout a site and each time
> show the description, but people would have you believe that such
> repeats of content could cause a duplicate content penalty. So, my
> question really comes down to "what hoops does google want us to jump
> through to ensure that a phrase only occurs once on a site?"

> Keyword stuffing has nothing to do with my question and is waaaaaaay
> off my radar as something to consider.

> On Oct 3, 8:33 am, dockarl wrote:

> > Daamsie - Sounds to me like you are chatting about keyword stuffing
> > rather than duplicate content.

> > Cheers,

> > doc

> > On Oct 3, 12:26 am, daamsie wrote:

> > > Apologies for the double post. Google Groups was apparently "not
> > > responding" .. typical Google. ;)

> > > On Oct 3, 12:20 am, daamsie wrote:

> > > > > No, that would just be considered plain spamming. :)

> > > > Lol :)

> > > > In seriousness though.. my question is not entirely in jest. How long
> > > > does a phrase have to be before you can't repeat it across your
> > > > pages?

> > > > For instance, I would assume "Copyright MyCompany 2007" is OK to
> > > > appear on all your pages. However maybe the phrase

> > > > "All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation
> > > > License. (See Copyrights for details.) Wikipedia® is a registered
> > > > trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)
> > > > (3) tax-deductible nonprofit charity."

> > > > repeated millions of times could be considered duplicate content.

> > > > So, where is the line drawn? 50 words, 100 words? Or is internal
> > > > duplication just not an issue?

> > > > On Oct 2, 10:51 pm, webado wrote:

> > > > > On 2 oct, 07:41, daamsie wrote:

> > > > > > Here's one..

> > > > > > If I write "communicating with Google is like talking to a brick wall"
> > > > > > in 100 places on my website, would that be considered duplicate
> > > > > > content?

> > > > > No, that would just be considered plain spamming. :)

> > > > > > On Sep 24, 4:12 pm, Adam Lasnik wrote:

> > > > > > > Thought I'd try something new here, and the team's backing me up on it
> > > > > > > (brave souls!)

> > > > > > > Got questions?  We've got answers:  at least five (5) substantive
> > > > > > > responses to your picks on webmaster'y topics over the next two weeks.

> > > > > > > We invite you to ask questions in this thread that:
> > > > > > > - don't deal with a specific site or sites
> > > > > > > - are likely to be of interest to a great many webmasters around the
> > > > > > > world
> > > > > > > - aren't already covered in one of our recent blog posts or in our
> > > > > > > Help Center

> > > > > > > And in turn we will do one of the following for each response:
> > > > > > > - Start a thread in this group with a detailed answer.
> > > > > > > - Add new Help Center documentation or substantially revise an
> > > > > > > existing doc to cover your question.
> > > > > > > - Do a blog post on the topic.

> > > > > > > Some ground rules:
> > > > > > > - Please don't get into in-depth discussion on each question in this
> > > > > > > thread; instead, kindly start a separate thread (and feel free to
> > > > > > > point there from this thread!)
> > > > > > > - Understand that -- unless we inexplicably get fewer than five
> > > > > > > questions here -- we're not going to be able to answer everything/
> > > > > > > everyone in this thread.
> > > > > > > - Webmaster'y questions or specific suggestions on topics to explore
> > > > > > > are welcomed... but not wish lists, okay? (e.g., "I wish Webmaster
> > > > > > > Tools stats were updated hourly!" and "Can we see more photos of
> > > > > > > Matt's Cats please?" do not count!)

> > > > > > > We'll continue to answer site-specific questions in other threads, but
> > > > > > > we thought it'd be interesting to tackle some broader/more-general
> > > > > > > themes separately.  And we'll see how this works out.  If it bombs,
> > > > > > > well, we tried.  If it rocks, then we'll consider doing it again!

> > > > > > > Have a great week everyone, and we'll look forward to seeing your
> > > > > > > questions here.- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -

> > > > > > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -