If you changed the URLs for the images I would
imagine this has basically the same affect if this
was a page URL.
Google will look for it in the previous index but
as the URL to the image changed it can't find
the graphic to display. That is why I suppose it is
blank.
I would expect it to come back eventually as
Google learns and indexes the new image URL.
Hmmm, Maybe you could help it along by
adding a 301 redirect from the old image
URL to the new. I have not tried that but it
makes sense and I can't see where it could hurt.
If you are getting impatient maybe give
that a try.
All the best,
Abracadabra
On May 10, 10:44 am, tickleslapmusic wrote:
> Hello,
> I designed and optimized
http://scansecurity.netfor a local security
> alarm company. I realized that I had never put in alt tags for the
> jpg images on the site. (in fact I had never done this probably
> because I wasn't sure how. Then recently I placed relevant key
> phrases in between the "" "" after alt "" "" after each jpg. this
> seemed sensible.
> However in doing so I realized that the jpgs were called things like
> 44_002.jpg and I thought it be smarter to rename the jpgs also to be
> what they are? Like "security_monitor.jpg" etc SoI did so for
> index.html and also index_files so they matched for example.
> This morning I noticed Google has crawled, and the caches are showing
> a blank space where the photos are.
> Did I do something wrong?
> Should I not have done one or both of these things?
> Will the cached jpgs show up a few crawls from now?
> The site looks fine for viewers and I don't want to do them any
> disservice with Google
> Thanks for any feed back