Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Google Webmaster Help
Home
About this group
Join this group
Discussions > Crawling, indexing, and ranking > A wee bit perplexed
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
burchman519  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22 2007, 10:18 am
From: burchman519
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:18:54 -0000
Local: Sat, Sep 22 2007 10:18 am
Subject: A wee bit perplexed
Print | Individual message | Report this message | Find messages by this author
I have a page thats main keyword is [edi web].  It comes 80th-ish in a
SERP (like all of my keywords do).  The keyword [edi web] is in the
title tag, H1&H2 tags, allinanchor, allintext, allinurl etc.. etc...

I see in webmasters tools that someone typed [liveperson w3c valid]
and my page comes up 3rd!!  The words [liveperson w3c valid] are not
in the title, H1&H2 tags etc.. etc..  But it is in the text of course.

I checked with many sites to see if I have key word stuffing, which I
do not.

I know there are more pages that contain the words [edi web] versus
[liveperson w3c valid].  But I was surprised to see it come up 3rd.

Besides there being more pages with [edi web], do you know of any
other reason in the big SERP difference?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
cristina  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22 2007, 10:45 am
From: cristina
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:45:13 -0000
Local: Sat, Sep 22 2007 10:45 am
Subject: Re: A wee bit perplexed
Print | Individual message | Report this message | Find messages by this author
If you mean the URL with the cached copy
http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:qddts3t1HWYJ:www.dmovers.com/edi...
then you can see that it appears in search results because
other URLs link to with anchor text including 'w3c valid'.
Probably the number and PageRank of pages linking to it
give your URL such a good position in search results for
these keywords.

Cristina.

On Sep 22, 3:18 pm, burchman519 wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tomcat619  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22 2007, 7:08 pm
From: Tomcat619
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:08:39 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 22 2007 7:08 pm
Subject: Re: A wee bit perplexed
Print | Individual message | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On your serice page the Meta tags are a little scrambled.

On Sep 22, 9:18 am, burchman519 wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google