Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Discussions > Crawling, indexing, and ranking > SES London: discuss it here!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  7 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Lella Google employee  
View profile
(2 users)  More options Mar 18, 11:03 am
From: Lella
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 18 2008 11:03 am
Subject: SES London: discuss it here!
Hi everybody!
It's the first time that I post as a Google Guide in the English
Webmaster group...I hope I am off to a good start :)
As some of you know, some of us from Google participated in the Search
Engine Strategies conference in London a few weeks ago. I would like
to post some questions and answers that we've heard, and open it up
for discussion! So don't be shy...I am looking forward to your
comments and replies!
Lella

-----------
What if I have a Flash site; how do I get crawled?

We're always eager to answer questions about Flash; in fact, it was
one of the "7 must-read Webmaster Central Blog posts". It is a
question that Bergy, our resident Flash expert, addressed in a blog
post: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/best-uses-of-flash...
 Also, you might want to check out our Help Center article on Flash:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=72746

Is it possible to submit a Sitemap to Google Webmaster Tools for
Google Image Search?
At the moment we don't support an Image Sitemaps protocol. As
discussed here: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=40318
current Sitemap formats include Video Sitemaps, Mobile Sitemaps, News
Sitemaps, Code Search Sitemaps and the general web Sitemaps. However
you can take advantage of Image Search by opting in to enhanced image
search in Webmaster Tools, as explained in the article available at
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=48367.
Besides, you will find more tips on how to ensure that your visitors
and search engines know
what your content is about here:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2006/12/ses-chicago-using-...

Do you do anything with the spam reports users submit? Should users
keep on submitting them?
Yes, absolutely! We love spam reports. :) Spam reports we receive are
analyzed and used for evaluating new spam-detecting algorithms, as
well as to identify trends in webspam. Our goal is to detect all the
websites engaging in manipulation attempts automatically in the future
and to make sure our algorithms rank those websites appropriately.
Please note that the result of submitting a spam report will not be
immediately visible to a user, so there is no need to submit the same
website multiple times in order for Google to evaluate it. You can
find here more information in our update on spam reporting:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/update-on-spam-rep...


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Aaron Pratt  
View profile
(1 user)  More options Mar 18, 12:27 pm
From: Aaron Pratt
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 18 2008 12:27 pm
Subject: Re: SES London: discuss it here!
Quote:

"Our goal is to detect all the websites engaging in manipulation
attempts automatically in the future and to make sure our algorithms
rank those websites appropriately."

The waiting is the hardest part
Every day you see one more card
You take it on faith, you take it to the heart
The waiting is the hardest part

=P

On Mar 18, 11:03 am, Lella wrote:


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jarooka  
View profile
(1 user)  More options Mar 18, 3:00 pm
From: Jarooka
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 18 2008 3:00 pm
Subject: Re: SES London: discuss it here!
" What if I have a Flash site; how do I get crawled?

We're always eager to answer questions about Flash; in fact, it was
one of the "7 must-read Webmaster Central Blog posts". It is a
question that Bergy, our resident Flash expert, addressed in a blog
post: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/best-uses-of-flash...
 Also, you might want to check out our Help Center article on Flash:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=72746 "

So, while I don't deal with Flash directly... the developer I work
with does. He has a task currently to build out some 'Flash' buttons
which sound like are just glorified animated buttons. (No biggie)
However, with that said... the folks in Marketing may want to 'kick it
up a notch' and start building out complete Flash pages. Which sorta
freaks me out. I've kindly pointed them to http://www.adobe.com/licensing/developer/search/faq/
and said that from what I've read here and at http://www.cnet.com/8301-13530_1-9844989-28.html,
we may be "OK" to start building out some pages in Flash and see how
they stack up against our regular HTML content.

Did I just give my co-worker bad advice. I don't have a URL to point
to for samples. I just would like a little more clarification. And
yes, I have read both of those links.

Thanks,

:)
J.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
irondarren  
View profile
 More options Mar 19, 10:44 am
From: irondarren
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 19 2008 10:44 am
Subject: Re: SES London: discuss it here!
Lella, Spam has always been an issue, it would be great if at the
click of a button all those websites involved in practices against the
webmaster guidelines found themselves very heavily penalised. Thus
keeping the search for the most relevant and important sites that have
true content for the searcher. One of the thing have have had a moan
about on the forum and im not the only one here, is the webmaster
guidelines often leave a lot open to interpretation. For example would
you consider a website that say we provide our services in the
following geographical areas, then proceeds to list quite a long list
of  Towns and cities. Is this really relevant information for the
user, or is it spamming to ensure when someone tries to do a search on
a local basis, example "product or services london" that there website
comes higher up in the search results. Even though the company
providing the service or product comes from miles away from london.
The webmaster guidelines are a little open there, as to if it is
against the rules. Admittedly it would almost be nice if within the
webmaster tools you could specify a smaller geographical location,
because my site is a .co.uk it is set by default to be UK based, but
had it been a .com i could have set its location to the UK. For the UK
it would be nice if you could set a location like a county wide or
regional wide, example setting you location as being the counties of
Sussex, Surrey and Kent, so any search that was aimed at being local
would by default pull up the website that had elected via the
webmaster tools to be set in those location.
State side I guess it would, set to example Alaska, any one doing a
search using the term Alaska would see those sites on the search, but
anyone doing a search for services in a specific town in Alaska would
see websites that elected to be seen in the search in that particular
state, if that makes sense. Just my 10cents worth or 10pence worth
(geographical location dependant on the currency )

On Mar 18, 3:03 pm, Lella wrote:


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jeff hall  
View profile
 More options Mar 20, 10:23 am
From: jeff hall
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Mar 20 2008 10:23 am
Subject: Re: SES London: discuss it here!
With regard to spam reporting is it possible to submit multiple sites
all at the same time rather than one report for each site.
We are currently victims of google bowling and find we do not have
enough time to individually report the hundreds of porn sites linking
to as currently we can only report one at a time.

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gissit  
View profile
 More options Mar 26, 5:00 am
From: Gissit
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 5:00 am
Subject: Re: SES London: discuss it here!
WRT the big list of places in order to show up for keyword/location
type searches. You would have thought it was really easy for Google to
see this kind of keyword spamming especially given that many of these
pages use a similar or same list. Unfortunately there are many sites
that rank very well for this and that can only serve to promote it as
a form of SEO. From a users point of view it is really BAD. I know if
I click on a serp result and land on a page like this I feel cheated
because I have been conned into going there and that can't be good for
user experience, can it?
A site that is targetting a particular location should contain far
more contextual text than a just a list of places.

For example a search on google uk for:

Ayrshire (Ayr, Kilmarnock, Irvine, Saltcoats, Kilwinning, Largs,
Troon, Cumnock) Berwickshire (Greenlaw, Duns, Eyemouth, Lauder,
Coldstream) Buteshire (Rothesay, Millport, Brodick, Lochranza)
Clackmannanshire (Clackmannan, Alloa, Tillicoultry, Tullibody)
Dumfriesshire (Dumfries, Annan, Lockerbie, Moffat, Sanquhar, Langholm,
Gretna) Dunbartonshire/Dumbartonshire (Dumbarton, Clydebank,
Cumbernauld, Helensburgh, Alexandria, Kirkintilloch)

Returns 10,800 results and there is no way anyone is going to convince
me that many (if any) of these these sites is at all relavant to the
locations listed. I can only assume that Google chooses to ignore the
problem as it certainly does not lack the capability to deal with what
is no more than a spammy list of keywords without context.

On Mar 19, 2:44 pm, irondarren wrote:


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
irondarren  
View profile
 More options Mar 26, 12:09 pm
From: irondarren
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 26 2008 12:09 pm
Subject: Re: SES London: discuss it here!
There are so seriously obvious spammers out there that you would have
thought Google could catch so easy, but they seem to escape detection
this one seems a serious offender  art-search.co.uk/artists/
wrought_iron/   do a search for say wrought iron gates kent, read the
snipit text google has in the search and you think hmm sounds good ill
view that. check the content of the site and the snipit of text found
in the search is no where to be found, and you realise thats its a
made for adsense website, with no content of any real use to a human
except to click on the paid links to go to another site. As far as i
can see a serious abuse of the webmaster guidelines, and abuse of
adsense. I would imagine everytime someone finds the site they curse
google for wasting there time because it isnt relvant to what they
wanted but its still there with all its hidden text, no content and
lots of lovely adsense. I guess its day will come when the google
alogorithm can detect it and it will be bye bye website.
Possibly one of the things many dont know is that as a searcher using
the google search if you found this site realise how much of a waste
it was you could easy file a spam report, most people dont bother or
just dont know that you can do such a thing.

On Mar 26, 9:00 am, Gissit wrote:


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google