Images are indexed based on the pages where they appear.
So if a page has any kind of content which qualifies for being
restricted with safe search on, that is what needs to be pointed out.
Use ICRA and/or PICS labels appropriate to each page's content for one
thing.
No idea how fast Googlebot reacts nor what signals exactly it takes to
judge content, especially for images.
is google actually using ICRA and/or PICS labels ?
some people reported that it was "safer" to place all contention
images in a separate folder, because google would black-list the
folder if one image was reported as "explicit" popping-up in safe
search. is that the right approach? or is it better to move all
contention content to a separate domain?
> Images are indexed based on the pages where they appear.
> So if a page has any kind of content which qualifies for being
> restricted with safe search on, that is what needs to be pointed out.
> Use ICRA and/or PICS labels appropriate to each page's content for one
> thing.
> No idea how fast Googlebot reacts nor what signals exactly it takes to
> judge content, especially for images.
> On Oct 25, 6:08 pm, loupiote wrote:
> > is there a way to tell google that some of my pages / images should
> > not be showed in google safe-search results?
> > i don't want my entire domain to be black-listed one day because it
> > contains a few adult-oriented or "explicit" content.
> > is there a way to tell this to googlebot? (on a page basis)
> > regarding images, can google flag an entire folder as "explicit
> > content" is only one image is reported as being "explicit".
> > providing the right tools to webmaster to filter their content would
> > be very helpful for both google and webmasters.
> is google actually using ICRA and/or PICS labels ?
> some people reported that it was "safer" to place all contention
> images in a separate folder, because google would black-list the
> folder if one image was reported as "explicit" popping-up in safe
> search. is that the right approach? or is it better to move all
> contention content to a separate domain?
> On Oct 25, 3:14 pm, webado wrote:
> > Images are indexed based on the pages where they appear.
> > So if a page has any kind of content which qualifies for being
> > restricted with safe search on, that is what needs to be pointed out.
> > Use ICRA and/or PICS labels appropriate to each page's content for one
> > thing.
> > No idea how fast Googlebot reacts nor what signals exactly it takes to
> > judge content, especially for images.
> > On Oct 25, 6:08 pm, loupiote wrote:
> > > is there a way to tell google that some of my pages / images should
> > > not be showed in google safe-search results?
> > > i don't want my entire domain to be black-listed one day because it
> > > contains a few adult-oriented or "explicit" content.
> > > is there a way to tell this to googlebot? (on a page basis)
> > > regarding images, can google flag an entire folder as "explicit
> > > content" is only one image is reported as being "explicit".
> > > providing the right tools to webmaster to filter their content would
> > > be very helpful for both google and webmasters.- Hide quoted text -
Yes, as webado mentioned, you can split these things into separate
folders, which will help us to somewhat understand the differences
(especially if pages and images both have their "adult" folders or are
in a shared "adult" folder). That said, I personally find it somewhat
problematic to have a site with lots of adult and non-adult content:
how easy is it for someone who stumbles into the non-adult part to
reach the adult part? Perhaps it would make more sense to split it
into subdomains or even separate domains? Anyway, that's hard to guess
at without knowing the site in question; maybe splitting things into
separate folders is already good enough :-).
Feel free to post the URL if you'd like the users (and Googlers) here
to take a more detailed look!
> Yes, as webado mentioned, you can split these things into separate
> folders, which will help us to somewhat understand the differences
> (especially if pages and images both have their "adult" folders or are
> in a shared "adult" folder). That said, I personally find it somewhat
> problematic to have a site with lots of adult and non-adult content:
> how easy is it for someone who stumbles into the non-adult part to
> reach the adult part? Perhaps it would make more sense to split it
> into subdomains or even separate domains? Anyway, that's hard to guess
> at without knowing the site in question; maybe splitting things into
> separate folders is already good enough :-).
> Feel free to post the URL if you'd like the users (and Googlers) here
> to take a more detailed look!
I think from a practical point of view, even the non-adult images
(talking about the landing pages, which are shown in Image Search) are
just a click or two away from adult images. This makes things somewhat
difficult to manage: if someone is searching with safe-search turned
on, they generally want to land at sites that are non-adult and do not
wish to be surprised by adult content just around the corner, a click
away.
Perhaps it would make more sense to organize your site into two
distinct parts - one with adult content and one without it? I realize
that as a photographer you might prefer to keep all of your work
together in one place (at least that's probably what I would want),
but in this case I imagine there's no way around saying that the whole
site is for adults.
|
