> Questions about the "Accessibility - Crawling and Indexing:" video
> from the latest Official Google Webmaster Central Blog post.

> video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEbS0a2JcAo&eurl=http://googlewebmaste...

> Thanks for all of the excellent work being done to better index Flash,
> I like millions of others are simply trying to better understand this
> new environment.

> There are a number of cases where text content in Flash is indexed
> properly in SERPs without progressive enhancement (PE) and as a Flash
> file, since support for SWFObject was introduced.  As you know, when
> Flash files are indexed in SERPs, progressive enhancement doesn't take
> place and no graceful degradation occurs because users without Flash
> access the Flash file directly.  I've been researching this issue and
> have documentation here:http://www.beussery.com/blog/index.php/2008/10/google-flash-seo/

> Questions about PE from the video:
> Can anyone confirm that Googlebot "sees" text content provided via PE
> since support for simple JavaScript like SWFObject was introduced?  If
> so, what causes Flash files to be indexed in many cases and not the
> parent URL where content provided via PE resides?  Is there anything
> webmasters can do to request which version (Flash or (X)HTML) is
> indexed in SERPs, for example like www or non-www in webmaster
> tools?

> Thanks for your time an help in understanding these issues

> -Brian

> (By the way, the "Webmaster Help Discussion Groups" link in the post
> doesn't seem to be working.)