Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
> Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
> Those links pages from 1998 aren't doing you any good either.
> On Aug 16, 8:49 am, IceGiant wrote:
> > Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
> Those links pages from 1998 aren't doing you any good either.
> On Aug 16, 8:49 am, IceGiant wrote:
> > Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
On your "Contact us" page, I found a string of hidden text that is probably not for users: Brass Parts Fittings Conex Metals : manufacturers, exporters of competitive brass plumbing, cable glands, hose fittings, electrical components, screws and brass fittings Brass Parts Fittings brass plumbing fittings electrical components electrical accessories brass hardware Brass Parts Brass inserts Brass Fittings Conex exporters of brass plumbing fittings Hose Fittings Brass Wood Screws Brass Pipe Fittings Brass Nuts Brass Components Brass Fittings Bronze
> In fact... looking through things some more, I'd say that your meta > tags also kind of look like 'Granny's Overstuffed Pillows'.
> In fact... leave the site exactly as it is. > It makes an outstanding lesson in 'how not to do it'.
> On Aug 16, 4:57 pm, JLH wrote:
> > Those links pages from 1998 aren't doing you any good either.
> > On Aug 16, 8:49 am, IceGiant wrote:
> > > Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > > > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > > > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
> > In fact... looking through things some more, I'd say that your meta > > tags also kind of look like 'Granny's Overstuffed Pillows'.
> > In fact... leave the site exactly as it is. > > It makes an outstanding lesson in 'how not to do it'.
> > On Aug 16, 4:57 pm, JLH wrote:
> > > Those links pages from 1998 aren't doing you any good either.
> > > On Aug 16, 8:49 am, IceGiant wrote:
> > > > Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > > > > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > > > > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
> > In fact... looking through things some more, I'd say that your meta > > tags also kind of look like 'Granny's Overstuffed Pillows'.
> > In fact... leave the site exactly as it is. > > It makes an outstanding lesson in 'how not to do it'.
> > On Aug 16, 4:57 pm, JLH wrote:
> > > Those links pages from 1998 aren't doing you any good either.
> > > On Aug 16, 8:49 am, IceGiant wrote:
> > > > Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > > > > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > > > > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.
Yes, full marks for any Googler chiming in on a user's question, but minus several million for posting only after four days since he asked his question when he's almost certainly no longer following the discussion.
> > In fact... looking through things some more, I'd say that your meta > > tags also kind of look like 'Granny's Overstuffed Pillows'.
> > In fact... leave the site exactly as it is. > > It makes an outstanding lesson in 'how not to do it'.
> > On Aug 16, 4:57 pm, JLH wrote:
> > > Those links pages from 1998 aren't doing you any good either.
> > > On Aug 16, 8:49 am, IceGiant wrote:
> > > > Just at a guess, I'd say that any invisible text which needs an > > > > electron microscope to read it even when it's been selected, is > > > > probably seen as an attempt at being naughty by Google.