We may have seemed a bit quiet last week, since many of us were away at SES in Chicago. But we're back now and I wanted to introduce Jonathan, the newest member of our team. He'll be reading and posting, so say hi and ask away!
It was fun meeting and talking to many of the webmasters who were able to attend SES in Chicago. I hope to hear from many more of you.
I am extremely interested in what you have to say. So don't be shy, please post your questions, issues, suggestions & thoughts.
I will be reading and posting as much as possible to ensure that you receive timely and accurate responses. It is a privilege to join such a vibrant and helpful community.
May all the ships you set sail, reach their destinations. ;)
Hi Jonathan! May be you can start by looking at my site.. www.IndiaCurry.com.. 1. Up to Novemebr 22, it had indexed about 980 pages. Now, whenever it crawls, it drops about 50 pages. Today, it shows it has only 61 pages indexed. Whats happening? 2. When I used to do search on "www.indiacurry.com", it used to display over 20,000 results. Now, it has reduced to about 600 also.. Whatever happend since November 22, something is reflecting both in my site:www.indiacurry.com as well as search of "www.indiacurry.com". I also have Google Adsense on every page. The PageImpression paer day statistics has dropped signficantly as well as the ticks. I am assuming, it is because the number of indexed pages has reduced dramatically. Suggestion!!!! yogi www.IndiaCurry.com
Hi jonathon, At the risk of sounding like a 68 year old whinging pensioner who hasn't received her benefits cheque, i just wondered if anyone at G has looked into the issue of the missing .coms on regional searches. Thank you and enjoy the reading of the pleasant and friendly posts on this forum::-)
Tell us something about yourself, if you wish :-). It's always great to see that there are actual people behind the names. As you can see in the other postings here we have a lot of great and interesting work lined up for you :-))).
If you had your own custom search engine, what kind of sites would you include?
John
PS Please answer my email about the brand and quantity of Swiss chocolate you prefer so that you can get started on sending me all the secret Google-stuff we discussed. Thanks.
Jonathan, welcome. Hope you have nerves of steel and an armadillo outer shell, these are requirements to deal with this group, didn't they tell you? ;)
Welcome ;) I'm not sure I can think of a non-secret-sauce question.
There's been a long-standing rumor about titles and meta description tags that are too similar to be a factor in having pages mistaken for duplicate content, even in cases where the on page text is completely unique. In cases where META descriptions are missing, Google also in some cases generates similar/identical description snippets for similar pages to display for a site: search. In these cases, similar description snippets reflect similar on-page content. Finally, often these pages with similar META descriptions are labelled supplemental (but as Adam Lasnik reminds me, correlation != correlation).
QUESTION: Are title/meta tags factors in duplicate content detection?
>QUESTION: Are title/meta tags factors in duplicate content detection?
Maybe titles are just weighted higher just like they seem to be for normal on-page seo? Perhaps the description tags are treated just like normal content - but as the first part of the content on the page? ;-)