I probably 'over optimised' this site towards the end of last year, and fairly convinced it's been under a penalty since around March.
Recently after changing the content of the site, I issued a reconsideration request - very detailed.
A couple of weeks later, the site shifted back to where I'd usually expect to see it.
As of three days ago, traffic has dropped substantially again, and a site: search shows the index page not in the index at all, whereas a search for www.backlesslingerie.com returns the index page.
I've heard rumours here that this is indicative of a penalty. Would love your thoughts
Hello I agree with Phil .. I also looked at the site. Very nice..er...er...er.. picture. LOL .. Your home page I do not feel it is over optimized. There is no spam It is well structured seo wise. I did find some bad links at http://www.bad-neighborhood.com/text-link-tool.htm you migth want to check that out. the site is not that accurate though.
No, it's not over optimised NOW - I fixed that - but if you check the wayback machine you'll see I went crazy trying to optimize for the term Lingerie - check about Jan this year.
Bad neighborhood? Na.. don't think so.. even if bad neighborhoods have linked to us (we did get a link from a porn site once - man... the traffic we had for a few days) - but we've never linked back - our links are earned.
> Hello > I agree with Phil .. > I also looked at the site. Very nice..er...er...er.. picture. LOL .. > Your home page > I do not feel it is over optimized. > There is no spam > It is well structured seo wise. > I did find some bad links athttp://www.bad-neighborhood.com/text-link-tool.htm > you migth want to check that out. the site is not that accurate > though.
> Roysnj
> On Aug 10, 8:14 am, Phil Payne wrote:
> > I've seen a dozen or so sites with the home page missing from a site: > > search. I'd love to know other people's opinions.
> > Perhaps we should collect a list - pick a thread to post all of them > > to.- Hide quoted text -
> No, it's not over optimised NOW - I fixed that - but if you check the > wayback machine you'll see I went crazy trying to optimize for the > term Lingerie - check about Jan this year.
> Bad neighborhood? Na.. don't think so.. even if bad neighborhoods have > linked to us (we did get a link from a porn site once - man... the > traffic we had for a few days) - but we've never linked back - our > links are earned.
> Cheers,
> doc
> On Aug 10, 10:44 pm, roysnj wrote:
> > Hello > > I agree with Phil .. > > I also looked at the site. Very nice..er...er...er.. picture. LOL .. > > Your home page > > I do not feel it is over optimized. > > There is no spam > > It is well structured seo wise. > > I did find some bad links athttp://www.bad-neighborhood.com/text-link-tool.htm > > you migth want to check that out. the site is not that accurate > > though.
> > Roysnj
> > On Aug 10, 8:14 am, Phil Payne wrote:
> > > I've seen a dozen or so sites with the home page missing from a site: > > > search. I'd love to know other people's opinions.
> > > Perhaps we should collect a list - pick a thread to post all of them > > > to.- Hide quoted text -
> Have you checked up on the "health" of the sites > on your outbound links lately? > On Aug 10, 10:19 am, dockarl wrote:
> > No, it's not over optimised NOW - I fixed that - but if you check the > > wayback machine you'll see I went crazy trying to optimize for the > > term Lingerie - check about Jan this year.
> > Bad neighborhood? Na.. don't think so.. even if bad neighborhoods have > > linked to us (we did get a link from a porn site once - man... the > > traffic we had for a few days) - but we've never linked back - our > > links are earned.
> > Cheers,
> > doc
> > On Aug 10, 10:44 pm, roysnj wrote:
> > > Hello > > > I agree with Phil .. > > > I also looked at the site. Very nice..er...er...er.. picture. LOL .. > > > Your home page > > > I do not feel it is over optimized. > > > There is no spam > > > It is well structured seo wise. > > > I did find some bad links athttp://www.bad-neighborhood.com/text-link-tool.htm > > > you migth want to check that out. the site is not that accurate > > > though.
> > > Roysnj
> > > On Aug 10, 8:14 am, Phil Payne wrote:
> > > > I've seen a dozen or so sites with the home page missing from a site: > > > > search. I'd love to know other people's opinions.
> > > > Perhaps we should collect a list - pick a thread to post all of them > > > > to.- Hide quoted text -
Completely irrelevant to your actual question, but in the advert at the bottom right of the Homepage do you mean "More discrete than a brief" or "More discreet than a brief"?
Maybe it's just the peculiarities of my set up (MS Windows Vista) but the video would not run under either Firefox 2.0.0.5 or IE 7.
> Completely irrelevant to your actual question, but in the advert at > the bottom right of the Homepage do you mean "More discrete than a > brief" or "More discreet than a brief"?
> Maybe it's just the peculiarities of my set up (MS Windows Vista) but > the video would not run under either Firefox 2.0.0.5 or IE 7.
> > Completely irrelevant to your actual question, but in the advert at > > the bottom right of the Homepage do you mean "More discrete than a > > brief" or "More discreet than a brief"?
> > Maybe it's just the peculiarities of my set up (MS Windows Vista) but > > the video would not run under either Firefox 2.0.0.5 or IE 7.
re: the video would not run. do you mean you couln't hear audio?
That's deliberate.. I muted it because the model possibly should stick to modelling rather than public speaking. A rather high timbred voice - didn't want to scare the living daylights out of people that had their speakers on.
