Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 36 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Scott Blum  
View profile  
(3 users)  More options Feb 6, 10:26 am
From: Scott Blum <sco...@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:26:53 -0500
Local: Fri, Feb 6 2009 10:26 am
Subject: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

Greetings GWT developers,

The GWT team is happy to announce the availability of 1.6 Milestone 1!
Binary distributions are available for download directly from GWT's Google
Code project.

http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1&q=1.6.0

As always, milestone builds like this are use-at-your-own-risk. There are
known bugs, and it definitely isn't ready for production use. Please expect
some trial and error getting everything to work. The javadoc that comes
bundled with the distribution should be up-to-date, but the online Developer
Guide (http://code.google.com/docreader/#p=google-web-toolkit-doc-1-6) is
still very much a work in progress. We will be updating it over the next
several weeks. In lieu of an up-to-date Developer Guide and release notes,
below are the major highlights relative to GWT 1.5.3.

*** New Project Structure in GWT 1.6 ***

One of the biggest changes to GWT 1.6 is a new project structure. The old
output format has been replaced by the standard Java web app expanded "war"
format, and the actual directory name does default to "/war". Note that the
war directory is not only for compiler output; it is also intended to
contain handwritten static resources that you want to be included in your
webapp alongside GWT modules (that is, things you'd want to version
control). Please also note that the "GWTShell" and "GWTCompiler" tools will
maintain their legacy behavior, but they have been deprecated in favor of
new "HostedMode" and "Compiler" tools which use the new war output. When 1.6
is officially released, we will be encouraging existing projects to update
to the new directory format and to use the new tools to take advantage of
new features and for compatibility with future GWT releases.

The sample projects provided in the GWT distribution provide an example of
correct new project configurations. For more details on the specifics of the
new project format, please see GWT 1.6 WAR design document (
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/WAR_Design_1_6).

A couple of important changes we should highlight here:

- Projects with server-side code (GWT RPC) must configure a "web.xml" file
at "/war/WEB-INF/web.xml". This web.xml file must define and publish any
servlets associated with the web application. See the included DynaTable
sample. Additionally, server-side library dependencies must be copied into
"/war/WEB-INF/lib". For example, any GWT RPC servlets must have a copy of
gwt-servlet.jar in this folder.

- HTML host pages will no longer typically be located in a GWT module's
public path. Instead, we'll be recommending that people take advantage of
the natural web app behavior for serving static files by placing host pages
anywhere in the war structure that makes sense. For exmaple, you might want
to load a GWT module from a JSP page located in the root of your web app. To
keep such handwritten static files separate from those produced by the GWT
compiler, the latter will be placed into module-specific subdirectories. Any
page that wishes to include a GWT module can do so via a script tag by
referencing the GWT-produced "<module>.nocache.js script" within that
module's subdirectory. As of 1.6, we'll be recommending that only
module-specific resources used directly by GWT code, such as image files
needed by widgets, should remain on the public path. See the included
Showcase sample for some examples of this distinction.

- When you do need to load resources from a module's public path, always
construct an absolute URL by prepending GWT.getModuleBaseURL(). For example,
'GWT.getModuleBaseURL() + "dir/file.ext"'. This advice has not changed, but
in the past it was easy to be sloppy with this, because the host page and
GWT module typically lived in the same directory, so using a relative URL
would usually do the right thing. Now that GWT modules live in a
subdirectory, you must reference public resources through
GWT.getModuleBaseURL().

*** Hosted Mode Enhancements ***

Although the legacy GWTShell still uses an embedded Tomcat server, the new
HostedMode runs Jetty instead. There is also a new "Restart Server" button
on the main hosted mode window. Clicking this button restarts the internal
Jetty server, which allows Java code changes to take effect on the server
without having to completely exit and restart hosted mode. This is useful
when making code changes to RPC servlets, or when serializable RPC types are
modified and the server and client are out of sync.

*** New EventHandler System ***

Event handlers have been added to replace the old event listeners used by
Widgets, History, and various other classes. The new system has a few
differences from the old system:

- EventHandler methods always take a single parameter: the GwtEvent that the
Widget fired. For example, ClickHandler has a single method
onClick(ClickEvent).

- Each GwtEvent contains accessors relevant to the event, such as the key
that was pressed on KeyEvents. Native events provide access to the
underlying native event object.

- Each EventHandler defines only one method, so you do not need to create
empty methods just to satisfy the interface requirements.

For users who create their own Widgets, you no longer need to manage
listeners manually. Every Widget has a HandlerManager that manages all of
its handlers. For native events, such as ClickEvent, just call
addDomHandler() from within your code to register a handler and sink the
associated event on the Widget. When the native event is detected, the
handler will automatically be called. For logical events, such as
SelectionEvent, call addHandler() and fire the event manually using the
fireEvent() method.

You can see examples of EventHandler usage in many of the updated GWT
widgets and samples, or in new projects created with the new webAppCreator
tool.

You can now trigger a native event on almost any Element. Create a new
native event using the Document.create*Event() methods, then dispatch it on
a specific Element by calling Element.dispatchEvent(). These methods allow
you to expand your test coverage in ways that were previously impossible.

*** New Widgets ***

DatePicker

The new DatePicker and DateBox widgets allow your users to select a date
from a calendar. The Showcase sample provides examples of both of these
widgets.

LazyPanel

The new LazyPanel widget allows you to delay the creation of certain
sections of your application until they are first accessed, improving
startup performance. For example, if your application has a seldom used
"Help" section, you can wrap it in a LazyPanel and create the user interface
only if and when the user tries to access it. To use the LazyPanel, extend
the class and override the abstract createWidget() method. The
createWidget() method will be called the first time you call setVisible() on
the LazyPanel.

*** Fixed Issues ***

Please see our bug tracker for a full list of fixed issues and enhancements
(
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list?can=1&q=statu...
).

As always, please report bugs to our issue tracker (
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list) after doing a quick
search to see if your issue has already been reported.  If you run into a
serious issue, feel free to also reply back to this thread.

Happy coding,
Scott, on behalf of the GWT team


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dop Sun  
View profile  
 More options Feb 7, 6:12 am
From: Dop Sun <dop...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 03:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 7 2009 6:12 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Waiting for quite sometime, and I'm targeting 1.6 to build my GDE
project for quite some time, and finally, got a milestone release
ready. :) Great News!

On Feb 6, 11:26 pm, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
cyril.lakech  
View profile  
 More options Feb 7, 10:43 am
From: "cyril.lakech" <cyril.lak...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 7 2009 10:43 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Great news !!!! Félicitations ! We don't need to build from the source
now !

I'm goint to test this M1 next week !

Regards,

On 6 fév, 16:26, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Samyem Tuladhar  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8, 8:28 am
From: Samyem Tuladhar <sam...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 05:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 8:28 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Great! I was wondering if this version supports OOPHM?

Thanks,
Samyem

On Feb 6, 10:26 am, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Arthur Kalmenson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8, 11:41 am
From: Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:41:39 -0500
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 11:41 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
It doesn't, OOPHM is suppose to be scheduled for 2.0. It is possible
to use OOPHM from the branch, although I haven't tried it myself.

--
Arthur Kalmenson


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Itamar Ravid  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8, 12:11 pm
From: Itamar Ravid <itamar.ira...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:11:01 +0200
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

Hi - I've perused the WAR Design document, but I've several questions that
remained unanswered.

In my project, we use GWT-SL and Gilead - the former for exporting Spring
beans as GWT-RPC services, and the latter for transferring Hibernate-enabled
objects back and forth between the server and client.

A consequence of using GWT-SL is that I no longer map my servlets through
web.xml - instead, I've a springDispatcher servlet which receives all
requests and routes them to the appropriate service exports I've defined
with GWT-SL, using the SimpleUrlHandlerMapping which Spring provides.

Now, since I'd like to route only GWT-RPC (and servlet) requests through the
Dispatcher servlet, I've only routed /services/* to it.

The difficulty arises when using Hosted Mode. First, I have to copy a
modified web.xml to ${project}/tomcat/webapps/ROOT. This web.xml routes all
requests to /services/* to my springDispatcher. This web.xml is different
than the one I distribute with my WAR, since it also includes mapping for
the GWTShellServlet. Also, in order for serialization to work, I have to
compile my project once (using GWTCompiler) and copy all resulting *.gwt.rpc
files to ${project}/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/${module}/. This occurs because the
GWTShellServlet generates these dynamically as GWT-RPC requests arrive.

I've semi-automated the whole process using Ant tasks, and I'm aware of the
gwt-maven plugin which provides some of this functionality, but I'd like to
know whether the situation has been fully or partly addressed with the 1.6
release.

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com>wrote:

...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sebastien  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8, 1:49 pm
From: Sebastien <chassa...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:49:38 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Hi,

I am interested to migrate from the 1.5.3 to the 1.6.0 M1. When I use
this M1 with -war option, the the compiler output is not like an
expanded war. I tried to specify all parameters (-war, -gen, -
extra ..) without success. The output of the compiler is always
similar to the output of the 1.5.3 compiler. The compiler indicates
the 1.6.0 version, so I am sure to use the 1.6. I am under linux
(ubuntu).

Do you have any idea why the compiler output is not like an expanded
war ?

Regards,
Seb

On 6 fév, 16:26, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dop Sun  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8, 5:45 pm
From: Dop Sun <dop...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
I guess in the sample projects (included in the M1 build), there is
build file for each and every of them, and within that, there build
tasks for the project. Maybe, you can have a try what there?

On Feb 9, 2:49 am, Sebastien <chassa...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "GWT 1.6 preliminary exploration and doc wish list" by Duong BaTien
Duong BaTien  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8, 6:01 pm
From: Duong BaTien <duong.bat...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:01:42 -0700
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: GWT 1.6 preliminary exploration and doc wish list

>  The GWT team is happy to announce the availability of 1.6 Milestone 1!
>  Binary distributions are available for download directly from GWT's Google
>  Code project.
>  Happy coding,
>  Scott, on behalf of the GWT team

Greetings:

Thanks for the tremendous efforts from GWT team and supporting
communities. Here are some preliminary exploration and wish list of the
coming doc:

1) Using the webAppCreator (ant 1.7.0, jdk 1.6) i create an application,
run the hosted mode, then the build to compile the app. In the app war
directory, i see the hosted.html and app.nocache.js, but Not the .css
and .html file as listed in the compiler output of the StockWatcher 1.6
example.

2) The current gwt-incubator_1-5_Dec_28.jar is not compatible with
GWT-1.6.0. Hope the new compatible version will be out soon. I am still
working through the examples to understand the new war structure,
especially the project that uses different modular GWT modules and the
location of public files for different modules. Some documentation and
suggested best practices may be required.

3) With new GWT Event Handler, the stockwatcher example shows a
container class to use a single handler method for event (ClickHandler)
coming from different event publishers (but1 and but2). GWT team may
share its experience and approach for all GWT event types in 1 container
class, especially the way to integrate GWT event handler with OpenAjax
Hub, leveraging GWT JSO and coming UIBinder ;-)

4) In the doc Articles and Tutorials, i see GWT for JSON Mashups and
Application of Facebook. It may be a good idea to centralize in 1 place
possible GWT applications and how-to to leverage Google API and
facilities: Gears, AppEngine, google-ajax-examples, etc.

Thanks

Duong BaTien
DBGROUPS and BudhNet


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1" by Sebastien
Sebastien  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 1:35 am
From: Sebastien <chassa...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 22:35:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 1:35 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Hi,

I take a look on the build.xml of samples. I didn't see any special
difference.
Here is a part of my build.xml :
<java maxmemory="1200m" classname="com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler"
        fork="true" failonerror="true" taskName="gwtc">
        <arg value="com.raisepartner.prism.PRISM" />
        <classpath>
                <pathelement location="src/main"/>
                <fileset dir="${prj.lib}"><include name="**/*.jar"/></fileset>
        </classpath>
</java>
=====>
[gwtc] Compiling module com.raisepartner.prism.PRISM
[gwtc]    Compiling 10
permutations
[gwtc]       Permutation compile
succeeded
[gwtc]    Linking into
war
[gwtc]       Link
succeeded
[gwtc]    Compilation succeeded --
483,002s

The output is 'war' directory at the root of my project. This
directory contains only the module directory. There is no WEB-INF
directory created. Is it the expected behavior ?
By looking the samples I understand that my main html page (the one
calling the nocache.js) must me copied manually at the root of the war
directory. The content of the <module>.public is copied into war/
<module>. I expected the content would be copied at the root of the
'war' directory.

So my conclusion is that there is no change compared to the
1.5.3 ... :-(

Regards,
Seb
On 8 fév, 23:45, Dop Sun <dop...@gmail.com> wrote:

...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
logicpeters  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 9:47 am
From: logicpeters <logicpet...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 9:47 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
"Note that the
war directory is not only for compiler output; it is also intended to
contain handwritten static resources that you want to be included in
your
webapp alongside GWT modules (that is, things you'd want to version
control)."

I'm not following...  Do you mean for us to include these static
resources in the compiler output directory and maintain this directory
under source control (with generated code alongside static source,
such as index.html and css files)?  That seems like a bad idea to me.
Why not enforce the standard J2EE project path (see Sun's blueprints),
and maintain these files under /src/conf.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Scott Blum  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 11:33 am
From: Scott Blum <sco...@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:33:37 -0500
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 11:33 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Itamar Ravid <itamar.ira...@gmail.com>wrote:

> The difficulty arises when using Hosted Mode. First, I have to copy a
> modified web.xml to ${project}/tomcat/webapps/ROOT. This web.xml routes all
> requests to /services/* to my springDispatcher. This web.xml is different
> than the one I distribute with my WAR, since it also includes mapping for
> the GWTShellServlet. Also, in order for serialization to work, I have to
> compile my project once (using GWTCompiler) and copy all resulting *.gwt.rpc
> files to ${project}/tomcat/webapps/ROOT/${module}/. This occurs because the
> GWTShellServlet generates these dynamically as GWT-RPC requests arrive.

> I've semi-automated the whole process using Ant tasks, and I'm aware of the
> gwt-maven plugin which provides some of this functionality, but I'd like to
> know whether the situation has been fully or partly addressed with the 1.6
> release.

Itamar,

I think you should find 1.6 much easier once you've switched over from
GWTShell to HostedMode.  Just use your real web.xml in hosted mode to map in
your springDispatcher; you no longer need to use GWTShellServlet at all.

Scott


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Scott Blum  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 11:35 am
From: Scott Blum <sco...@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:35:29 -0500
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 11:35 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

Hi Sebastien,

It's actually fairly compatible, the difference is more in attitude and
expectation.  You would provide the WEB-INF directory yourself, GWT no
longer tries to control everything.  The model is more that GWT can plug in
easily to existing web apps.  For example, you would also want to setup
build rules to compile your server-side code into WEB-INF/classes.

Scott

...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Scott Blum  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 11:37 am
From: Scott Blum <sco...@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:37:52 -0500
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 11:37 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, logicpeters <logicpet...@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Note that the
> war directory is not only for compiler output; it is also intended to
> contain handwritten static resources that you want to be included in
> your
> webapp alongside GWT modules (that is, things you'd want to version
> control)."

> I'm not following...  Do you mean for us to include these static
> resources in the compiler output directory and maintain this directory
> under source control (with generated code alongside static source,
> such as index.html and css files)?  That seems like a bad idea to me.

Not exactly... the compiler output directory is considered to be
"/war/<moduleName>".... NOT "/war" itself really.  In other words, you can
put whatever resources you want into the top-level war directory, the
compiler generated files will always be put into the moduleName subdirectory
under this, so as not to conflict.

Why not enforce the standard J2EE project path (see Sun's blueprints),

> and maintain these files under /src/conf.

We might have to look into this.

Scott


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Itamar Ravid  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 3:30 pm
From: Itamar Ravid <itamar.ira...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:30:01 +0200
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 3:30 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

Awesome! Thanks, Scott.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
maku  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10, 4:01 am
From: maku <martin.k...@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Feb 10 2009 4:01 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

Hi,

from my point of view it is nice that GWT 1.6 brings a more
transparent project structure.

BUT, what we really need is a concept which fits into enterprise
development strategies.

e.g. I'm not able to see how using maven and continous integraton and
developing can be achievend in a painless way.
- running application in hosted mode maybe with an own server (-
noserver mode))
- working with more than one project
- clean seperation of generated and not generated code
- and so on...

Yes, I know it is possible to handle this stuff and we did it ... But
we spent already so much time on this infrastructural things. And I
guess we are not alone....
And to get a simple to use infrastructure is almost impossible.

Regards,
Martin


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
logicpeters  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10, 9:24 am
From: logicpeters <logicpet...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Feb 10 2009 9:24 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
I haven't yet played with the new project structure, but speaking with
1.4 and 1.5 experience, I agree with Martin - that it is somewhat
difficult to build GWT projects with "enterprise continuous
integration systems", such as Maven (which, in particular, depends on
a certain project structure).  A little more configurability in where
source can be located may be the best solution to this issue.

On Feb 10, 4:01 am, maku <martin.k...@gmx.at> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Renouf  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10, 11:45 pm
From: Mark Renouf <mark.ren...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Feb 10 2009 11:45 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
On Feb 6, 10:26 am, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:

> DatePicker

> The new DatePicker and DateBox widgets allow your users to select a date
> from a calendar. The Showcase sample provides examples of both of these
> widgets.

Ooh. Does the inclusion of DatePicker imply that
ImmutableResourceBundle is also ready? I'm trying to get my head
around how styling works in DatePicker. It looks rather complex...

> LazyPanel

> The new LazyPanel widget allows you to delay the creation of certain
> sections of your application until they are first accessed, improving
> startup performance.

We've rolled our own using this exact technique, to make a
LazyTabPanel, etc but this will be easy to retrofit. Great addition,
thanks!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alex dP (Violet UML Editor, WebVNC...)  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11, 4:29 am
From: "Alex dP (Violet UML Editor, WebVNC...)" <alexandre.de.pelleg...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 11 2009 4:29 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Congratulation for this release.

Unfortunately, there's still nothing about Maven support. No official
repository, no official plugin.... I hope this will arrive this
Milestone 2.

Regards,
Alexandre de Pellegrin

On Feb 6, 4:26 pm, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Renouf  
View profile  
 More options Feb 11, 8:01 am
From: Mark Renouf <mark.ren...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:01:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 11 2009 8:01 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
On Feb 10, 11:45 pm, Mark  Renouf <mark.ren...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 6, 10:26 am, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:

> > DatePicker

> > The new DatePicker and DateBox widgets allow your users to select a date
> > from a calendar. The Showcase sample provides examples of both of these
> > widgets.

> Ooh. Does the inclusion of DatePicker imply that
> ImmutableResourceBundle is also ready? I'm trying to get my head
> around how styling works in DatePicker. It looks rather complex...

To answer my own question, I just looked at the release branch and the
ImmutableResourceBundle/StyleInjector support was removed. It's got
the standard list of CSS class selectors in the Javadoc, and a set of
default styles has been added to the GWT theme css.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Scott Blum  
View profile  
 More options Feb 12, 12:26 pm
From: Scott Blum <sco...@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:26:32 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 12 2009 12:26 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Alex dP (Violet UML Editor, WebVNC...) <

alexandre.de.pelleg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Congratulation for this release.

> Unfortunately, there's still nothing about Maven support. No official
> repository, no official plugin.... I hope this will arrive this
> Milestone 2.

> Regards,
> Alexandre de Pellegrin

This is not likely for 1.6... we simply don't have any Maven users (much
less experts) among the contributors.  If this is something a lot of people
would find valuable, it would be great if someone in the community could
step up.

I will note that we made some changes in 1.6 regarding ClassLoaders that
should remove barriers to running GWT hosted mode (and unit tests) from
within Maven.

Scott


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
flyingbuzz@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 12, 1:52 pm
From: "flyingb...@gmail.com" <flyingb...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Feb 12 2009 1:52 pm
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
Well, I just finished changing every single listener i have into
handlers and have to rewrite widgets a little that fires listeners. I
have no idea what to do with the build.xml thing to make it using new
compiler.

On Feb 12, 9:26 am, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Arthur Kalmenson  
View profile  
 More options Feb 13, 10:08 am
From: Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:08:59 -0500
Local: Fri, Feb 13 2009 10:08 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

> Congratulation for this release.

> Unfortunately, there's still nothing about Maven support. No official
> repository, no official plugin.... I hope this will arrive this
> Milestone 2.

> Regards,
> Alexandre de Pellegrin

I think you'll note that GWT is in the central Maven repository
(http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/) and there are
currently at least two Maven plugins (being merged), the gwt-maven
plugin: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven/ and the Codehaus GWT
plugin: http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/. I and a number of
other people use Maven every day, and it works OK. I'm sure it could
be better, but it does work.

--
Arthur Kalmenson

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Alex dP (Violet UML Editor,


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Scott Blum  
View profile  
 More options Feb 13, 10:26 am
From: Scott Blum <sco...@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:26:29 -0500
Local: Fri, Feb 13 2009 10:26 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

Would people be happier if we called this the "official community-supported
GWT/Maven integration"? :)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <arthur.k...@gmail.com>wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Allahbaksh  
View profile  
 More options Feb 14, 9:44 am
From: Allahbaksh <a.allahba...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 14 2009 9:44 am
Subject: Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1
GWT 1.6 M1 log.tld file not found error
Hi,
I was using GWT 1.5. Today I moved my application to GWT1.6M1 so as to
try the rich features. When I move the project I am getting below
error when I start my application.

Please note if I create some example application it works fine. Can
some one throw some light on the same.

Regards,
Allahbaksh

java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\workspace\ProjectName\war\WEB-INF
\log.tld (The system cannot find the file specified)
        at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method)
        at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(Unknown Source)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.file.FileURLConnection.connect(Unknown
Source)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.file.FileURLConnection.getInputStream
(Unknown
Source)
        at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLEntityManager.setupCurrentEntity
(Unknown Source)
        at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLVersionDetector.determineDocVers ion
(Unknown Source)
        at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse
(Unknown Source)
        at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse
(Unknown Source)
        at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.XMLParser.parse
(Unknown
Source)
        at
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse
(Unknown Source)
        at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.SAXParserImpl
$JAXPSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source)
        at javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser.parse(Unknown Source)
        at org.mortbay.xml.XmlParser.parse(XmlParser.java:188)
        at org.mortbay.xml.XmlParser.parse(XmlParser.java:204)
        at
org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.TagLibConfiguration.configureWebApp
(TagLibConfiguration.java:227)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext
(WebAppContext.java:1217)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.doStart
(ContextHandler.java:513)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart
(WebAppContext.java:
448)
        at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.jetty.JettyLauncher
$WebAppContextWithReload.doStart(JettyLauncher.java:236)
        at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start
(AbstractLifeCycle.java:39)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.doStart
(HandlerWrapper.java:130)
        at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.doStart(Server.java:222)
        at org.mortbay.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start
(AbstractLifeCycle.java:39)
        at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.jetty.JettyLauncher.start
(JettyLauncher.java:283)
        at com.google.gwt.dev.HostedMode.doStartUpServer
(HostedMode.java:368)
        at com.google.gwt.dev.HostedModeBase.startUp
(HostedModeBase.java:587)
        at com.google.gwt.dev.HostedModeBase.run(HostedModeBase.java:
394)
        at com.google.gwt.dev.HostedMode.main(HostedMode.java:231)

On Feb 13, 8:26 pm, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 36   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google