Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Google Web Toolkit Contributors
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Gears enabled GWT
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Robert Hanson  
View profile  
 More options Jun 7 2007, 8:05 am
From: "Robert Hanson" <iamroberthan...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:05:25 -0400
Local: Thurs, Jun 7 2007 8:05 am
Subject: Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Gears enabled GWT
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

I saw that post and was thinking the same thing, so I started working on a
simple generator.  I should have working code and a write-up posted by
Monday.

The only potential issue that I am running into so far is that GWT.create()
can only take a single argument.  This will make it difficult to handle
associations between data objects.

Can anyone think of another way to get all of the data types passed to a
single generator for inspection?  Maybe it is easy to add a new create()
method that takes an array of classes?

Rob

On 6/5/07, Rob Jellinghaus <rjellingh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> GWT-generator-based ORM.  Someone on the Gears list has already made a
> first stab at it:

> http://groups.google.com/group/google-gears/browse_thread/thread/e6e8...

> I haven't looked at the implementation at all, but the code samples
> seem pretty nice.  A generator-based implementation could do away with
> even the minimal amount of boilerplate that the code has now, and
> could start adding things like ID field support, one-to-many / many-to-
> many references, etc., etc.

> Cheers!
> Rob

> On Jun 5, 9:09 am, Jason Essington <jason.essing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > O.K. now that Gears has been announced, and the gwt-google-apis
> > project includes Gears as its first api, I thought I'd start a thread
> > about how/where GWT could benefit from becoming Gears enabled.

> > 1) Some folks have complained about object [de]serialization, so if
> > Gears is present, why not move this task off to a worker. RPC is
> > already asynchronous, just get this stuff out of the main ui loop.

> > 2) LocalDB backed SuggestBox. Why not have suggestions cached by a
> > worker, then when a Suggest box is used the suggestions could be
> > served from the local data store.

> > 3) Cache i18n Strings in the local database ... this could allow
> > users to change regions on the fly, and pretty much instantaneously.

> > 4) From the Gears list, someone has already made a dictionary, so how
> > about a Gears backed spelling api for the RichTextEditor.

> > Any other ideas?

> > -jason


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google