downgrade 6.0 to 5.2

0 views
Skip to first unread message

PrincessValentina

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:39:47 PM11/25/09
to Google Search Appliance/Google Mini - Google Search Appliance/Google Mini
Is it possible to do downgrade from GSA 6.0 to GSA 5.2.
We have the problem that GSA version 6.0 doesn't serve protect
contents of fileserver (indexed with smb protocol)

Can anyone help me?

Ivan Irawan

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 10:04:07 PM11/25/09
to google-search-...@googlegroups.com
I think the problem is not on GSA 6.0. Before check "serve" service,
we have to check the crawl and index process. Can GSA 6.0 crawl and
indexed protected contents?

regards,

Ivan Irawan
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Search Appliance/Google Mini" group.
> To post to this group, send email to Google-Search-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Google-Search-Applia...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Search-Appliance-Help?hl=en.
>
>
>

Arthur Winailan

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 4:28:20 AM11/26/09
to google-search-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Valle,

There's no need to downgrade your GSA. You can use LDAP for protected content on a fileserver.


- Arthur -

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Search Appliance/Google Mini" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Search-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to Google-Search-Applia...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Search-Appliance-Help?hl=en.





--
Arthur Winailan
NewSync Technologies
Google Enterprise Search Consultant

brianb

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 9:01:37 PM11/26/09
to Google Search Appliance/Google Mini - Google Search Appliance/Google Mini
Yeah, there is no need to downgrade because 6.0 should work. The best
thing to do would be to contact support if you are having issues.

Brian

On Nov 26, 2:39 am, PrincessValentina <valentina.ando...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages