Hi,
Now known system specific labels are "Unread, Inbox, Draft, Drafts,
All, All Mail, Trash, Spam, Sent, Sent Mail, Star and Starred".
I believe there must be more, hope you can find all of it:)
Yeah, I noticed that as well. I was pissed by the fact the labels
weren't updated right when I got new mail, so I deleted them. I hope
the one they implement will work better.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:52:32 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, I have a read and an unread label. Made them in July so you must be right.
I don't think they're going to add another label though, for "Unread".
I think they just added it because it was causing ghost effects and
stuff. They basically block all the keywords used in the Thread View.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:00:46 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed that as well. I was pissed by the fact the labels
> weren't updated right when I got new mail, so I deleted them. I hope
> the one they implement will work better.
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:52:32 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ah, I have a read and an unread label. Made them in July so you must be right.
Yeah, I would like to see them tweak the interface so when it
reloads...then EVERYTHING is refreshed...like the labels, and boxes
and the current view. I don't like when it will refresh and it will
show new mail in the labels/boxs, but not show it in the inbox...
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:03:40 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think they're going to add another label though, for "Unread".
> I think they just added it because it was causing ghost effects and
> stuff. They basically block all the keywords used in the Thread View.
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:00:46 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, I noticed that as well. I was pissed by the fact the labels
> > weren't updated right when I got new mail, so I deleted them. I hope
> > the one they implement will work better.
> > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:52:32 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ah, I have a read and an unread label. Made them in July so you must be right.
> Yeah, I would like to see them tweak the interface so when it
> reloads...then EVERYTHING is refreshed...like the labels, and boxes
> and the current view. I don't like when it will refresh and it will
> show new mail in the labels/boxs, but not show it in the inbox...
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:03:40 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think they're going to add another label though, for "Unread".
> > I think they just added it because it was causing ghost effects and
> > stuff. They basically block all the keywords used in the Thread View.
> > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:00:46 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yeah, I noticed that as well. I was pissed by the fact the labels
> > > weren't updated right when I got new mail, so I deleted them. I hope
> > > the one they implement will work better.
> > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:52:32 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Ah, I have a read and an unread label. Made them in July so you must be right.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:16:37 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> usually if there is a difference in my account.. new mail is shown in
> the inbox.. but the mailbox view and labels do not reflect the message
> counts.
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:02:04 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, I would like to see them tweak the interface so when it
> > reloads...then EVERYTHING is refreshed...like the labels, and boxes
> > and the current view. I don't like when it will refresh and it will
> > show new mail in the labels/boxs, but not show it in the inbox...
> > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:03:40 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I don't think they're going to add another label though, for "Unread".
> > > I think they just added it because it was causing ghost effects and
> > > stuff. They basically block all the keywords used in the Thread View.
> > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:00:46 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Yeah, I noticed that as well. I was pissed by the fact the labels
> > > > weren't updated right when I got new mail, so I deleted them. I hope
> > > > the one they implement will work better.
> > > > On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:52:32 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Ah, I have a read and an unread label. Made them in July so you must be right.
|
