I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
show the change though -
The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
which has been edited) is here
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> show the change though -
> The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> which has been edited) is here
I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
get's your link?
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> mean your account was readable by others.
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > show the change though -
> > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > which has been edited) is here
> I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> get's your link?
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > mean your account was readable by others.
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > show the change though -
> > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > which has been edited) is here
QUOTE: hmm, first...that's not your screenshot...someone else took it, so how
do you know that it's real? second...that link dosen't work for me.
heh. =)
Actually I took the screenshot on my second account
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:26:04 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> QUOTE: hmm, first...that's not your screenshot...someone else took it, so how
> do you know that it's real? second...that link dosen't work for me.
> heh. =)
> Actually I took the screenshot on my second account
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > get's your link?
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > show the change though -
> > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > which has been edited) is here
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:28:37 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yup that looks like a legit button from google.
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:26:04 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > QUOTE: hmm, first...that's not your screenshot...someone else took it, so how
> > do you know that it's real? second...that link dosen't work for me.
> > heh. =)
> > Actually I took the screenshot on my second account
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > get's your link?
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > which has been edited) is here
yeah, he said it was something like...
==
I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
show the change though -
==
read the first posts... =p
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> link associated with it?
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > get's your link?
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > which has been edited) is here
damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
going to do about it?
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yeah, he said it was something like...
> ==
> I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> show the change though -
> ==
> read the first posts... =p
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > link associated with it?
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> going to do about it?
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > ==
> > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > show the change though -
> > ==
> > read the first posts... =p
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > link associated with it?
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > going to do about it?
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > ==
> > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > show the change though -
> > > ==
> > > read the first posts... =p
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > link associated with it?
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> myself off a cliff
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > going to do about it?
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > ==
> > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > show the change though -
> > > > ==
> > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> > myself off a cliff
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > > going to do about it?
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > > ==
> > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > ==
> > > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:55 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Lol, I was just kidding...
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> > > myself off a cliff
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > > > going to do about it?
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > > > ==
> > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > ==
> > > > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:53:11 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
So anyway... Has anyone else seen this? I checked my three other
accounts, and none of them show the atom link. Could this be something
they tried for a few minutes, and took off?
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:17:52 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> don't worry man.. i knew your where kidding...
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:11:00 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > haha
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:55 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Lol, I was just kidding...
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> > > > myself off a cliff
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > > > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > > > > going to do about it?
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> > > > > > > > > > > "Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is
> > > > > > > > > > > why several of us died of tuberculosis."
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 02:31:22 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So anyway... Has anyone else seen this? I checked my three other
> accounts, and none of them show the atom link. Could this be something
> they tried for a few minutes, and took off?
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:17:52 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > don't worry man.. i knew your where kidding...
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:11:00 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > haha
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:55 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Lol, I was just kidding...
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> > > > > myself off a cliff
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > > > > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > > > > > going to do about it?
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is
> > > > > > > > > > > > why several of us died of tuberculosis."
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 02:31:22 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So anyway... Has anyone else seen this? I checked my three other
> accounts, and none of them show the atom link. Could this be something
> they tried for a few minutes, and took off?
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:17:52 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > don't worry man.. i knew your where kidding...
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:11:00 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > haha
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:55 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Lol, I was just kidding...
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> > > > > myself off a cliff
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > > > > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > > > > > going to do about it?
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:06:36 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is
> > > > > > > > > > > > why several of us died of tuberculosis."
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:35:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i checked all the accounts that i could and none of them showed any
> atom feed either.
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 02:31:22 +0200, Triple Seven <trip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So anyway... Has anyone else seen this? I checked my three other
> > accounts, and none of them show the atom link. Could this be something
> > they tried for a few minutes, and took off?
> > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:17:52 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > don't worry man.. i knew your where kidding...
> > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:11:00 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > haha
> > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:55 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Lol, I was just kidding...
> > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:07:53 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > oh bummer... no more posting in the lounger. i might as well throw
> > > > > > myself off a cliff
> > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:58:58 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > nothing on gmail-users... *wink* but you can't post on the lounge anymore...
> > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:56:40 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > damnit i don't know how i let that one slip by... i should have caught
> > > > > > > > that first post. oh hell... i guess im still a newbie.. what are you
> > > > > > > > going to do about it?
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:54:27 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > yeah, he said it was something like...
> > > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > ==
> > > > > > > > > read the first posts... =p
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:32:17 -0700, Derek <derek.punsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > when you got the image properties for that atom button...was there a
> > > > > > > > > > link associated with it?
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:28:54 -0400, CarLBanks <carlba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I know, hmm it would be possible. Atom feeding is great.
> > > > > > > > > > > > yah dude... lets give gmail a little more credit. those smart bastards!
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:00:33 -0500, T. M. Tracy <tmtr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure it might need user/pass auth...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I mean come on...give google some freaking credit. You think they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > would just have an atom feed to your email free avail to anyone who
> > > > > > > > > > > > > get's your link?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > How would atom work? If someone got a hold of your atom link it would
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mean your account was readable by others.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:48:22 +0100, Lee Gibbs <lee.gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I logged into my secondary account today, to find a rather unusual surprise.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below the labels there is an icon saying 'Atom Feed', which links to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://gmail.google.com/gmail/feed/atom. lee.gi...@gmail.com does not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > show the change though -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The non-edited screenshot (apart from the e-mail address at the top
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which has been edited) is here
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > why several of us died of tuberculosis."
As do I. One for each type of "pleasure"; I enjoy one for my blog, one
for my personal life, one for double-life, one for business, one for
news, one for forums and the likes, one for online shopping and the
likes.
Triple 7 is my name, and seven's my game. =P
LOL. I don't really have that many (well, I do, but I don't use that
many), I only use like 3-4 of them.
