They took so long to incoporate such as basic feature, but now millions
in the world will have reason to celebrate.
I'm really really really happy this feature is now part of the gmail
interface - thanks Google!
Why would I want to keep my daily personal TV guide emails for
instance? Knowing The Simpsons was on at 6pm on October 24 2005 won't
be much use to me in 10 years will it?
What about emails that come back with undelivered errors - not worth
keeping.
What is something is sent to me twice, maybe with attachments - I don't
want to keep both - it takes up space.
Some stuff I know I won't want later - so why archive it?
There are many reasons why people want to delete stuff - you shouldn't
have to go via a pull-down menu to do.
Thanks again, Google!
:) Yep that was me ^^^
Im glad they moved the delete button and is now visible on the main
page.
:) Yep that was me who raised this issue back in Nov '05.
Im glad they moved the delete button and is now visible on the main
page.
rgds,
rdeguz1
Fanis
I don't get all the excitement with the 'Delete button' - if you use
it that often maybe you should stop using email? (:
Thank you, Google!
mark
My problem with the new button is not that it exists (I do like it) but
that Google changed the concept from "Move to trash" to "Delete". The
Delete button does not do what it says it does. Clicking the "Delete"
button does not "delete" the message--it moves it to the "Trash" Label.
I know, I know, it's symantics. I've heard people say, "That's how it
is done in the UI world." and "They still provide an "undelete"
capability, consistant with other UI's." But still, to me, it is
misleading. Yes, "Delete" is a familiar concept (and by extension,
"undelete"), but remember that Google has tried to innovate with Gmail.
Promoting the "delete" concept undermines their concept of saving email
for later retrieval. While it was never a popular decision to make the
delete/trash function more difficult to use, it really made me, an avid
Gmail user, think more about what was important to save and what was
not.
Of course, over time, this will simply become a non-issue because we
will all forget that it was ever an issue... ;-)
More information is included in those pages.
Fanis
But seriously, Jim, I couldn't agree more with you. Google is trying
to innovate with Gmail, and promoting the storage of emails may help
the user think a little more about what's needed like in your case,
but mostly helps them build a more accurate profile of you. They will
of course be considerate of their users and try to accommodate them,
but I expect (just like any other company) to put their own interests
in front.
As such, this new Delete button seems to be contradicting what they've
been preaching so far. Did they succumb to pressure from users and
media? I am more inclined to think that the addition of the button
helps Google in some way, even if it's only from user satisfaction. It
is, after all, an element reminiscent of interfaces that most users
are used to.
Besides, I'm already used to archiving everything. The vast majority
of my emails on Gmail is still mailing list traffic, which I know I
can throw away if I start running out of space. And since Gmail
increases capacity continuously, the only way to overrun its expansion
rate would be to keep big attachments - which I do delete.
Fanis
Great point you make Jim. I agree that "Delete" is symantically
incorrect, although for your average user it is probably more
understandable.
Personally I don't delete most e-mails. Sometimes I delete messages
from mailing lists I am on that I don't have time to read. I'd rather
do this than mark them as read when I actually haven't read them.
Kind of weird. Maybe it's officially released now? Is anyone else
NOT seeing it using US/English settings? Try reading about it and
seeing if it shows up? Maybe that's their clever way to get you to
RTFM?
--Chuck Tomasi
--Host of Gmail Podcast
--http://www.chuckchat.com
Ian.