Most Prolific Reseachers:
1) Bobbie7 - 3570
2) Pinkfreud - 2361
3) Juggler - 2065
4) Tutuzdad - 1813
5) Pafalafa - 1742
6) Scriptor - 1581
7) PoliticalGuru - 1458
8) Easterangel - 1332
9) Rainbow - 1291
10) Hummer - 1150
11) JustAskScott - 1142
12) Crabcakes - 1065
These are the only researchers who have answered over 1000 questions.
There are many more just under 1000 such as Answerfinder, CZH,
Tlsspiegel, and Denco.
Least Prolific Researchers
1) Kf - 1
2) Jickster - 1
3) Goniff - 1
4) Berean - 1
5) Dhale - 1
6) AreleneGreen - 1
7) Leslie - 2
8) Cheeser - 2
9) BobJames - 2
10) Mork - 2
11) StWriley - 2
12) Sabine -2 (Answered 2 questions, both received a 1 star rating)
13) Crys - 2
14) Eloise - 2
15) nocky -2
There are many more under 10 questions answered.
I wish the Editors had inactivated long-dormant GARs and hired some new
blood. And Bowler, my young fellow, you'd have been at the top of the
"new blood" list if I'd been in charge.
by coincidence, i stumbled across an answer by app_security-ga a night
or two ago. this researcher was also a one-answer wonder, who's not on
your list. but what they lacked in quality they made up for in speed.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=750868
-cab
Thanks, Bowler, for that info.
Carmen
On Dec 21, 6:38 pm, "aceresearcher" <ace.researc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> barneca wrote:
> > by coincidence, i stumbled across an answer by app_security-ga a night
> > or two ago. this researcher was also a one-answer wonder, who's not on
> > your list. but what they lacked in quality they made up for in speed.
>
> > http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=750868Note that this is the only Question that Customer ever asked as well.
> I'm betting that app_security-ga's real name is Jesse Burns, and he was
> trying to figure out how to get some page rank for himself, and
> remembered that he had Google Answers Researchers privileges. Two PCs
> side-by-side, signed into one as sfinfosec-ga and into the other as
> app_security-ga.
>
> How lame. If he is so good, he ought to be able to figure out more
> legitimate ways of promoting his company and his paper.
I wonder if the proportion of answered questions was greater in the
early days.
Myo
Davesch7 - 1
A few other "notables":
Petrossian - 3
Sa - 3
Unicon - 3
Jonathon - 3
Thefriendlylibrarian - 3
Dumdumdiga - 4
Pinky (not our Pinkie) - 4
Coral - 4
Authorshelper - 4
Bizwhiz - 4
Gigi - 5
Skmitchell - 5
Westie - 5
Djmetz - 5
> > Myo- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
Tryx
For the least prolific, I went into each category and sorted the
answers by date with the earliest questions first. Many of the early
researchers are no longer active and I knew that many of them would
perhaps only have answered a few questions. I just went through, page
by page, until the odd researchers just seemed to filter away. I
probably missed some because my browsing usually ended around 2004 and
when looking through the categories, GA will only list the first 1000
questions.
Any others anyone finds, please feel free to comment.
Also, as Pinkfreud pointed out, there are a number of researcher who
never answered a question. Not sure how to find their names out
though.
> > > > Myo- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
brave3-ga
This researcher has not been rated yet.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=786508
Subject: Re: Where do we all go from here?
From: brave3-ga on 29 Nov 2006 09:59 PST
http://answers.google.com/answers/ratings?user=2655902642117827031
This researcher has not been rated yet.
I don't think that long-dormant researchers should have been
deactivated (this is in my own self-interest, admittedly), but new ones
definitely could have been hired and that would have breathed new life
into the service.