----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:24 PM
Subject: SHORT - BBV: Citizens Sue to Stop Gov't from Linking Votes
to Voters -
You can discuss or rate this here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/8/81913.html
- Permission to excerpt or reprint granted with above link.
NATIONAL -
CITIZENS SUE TO STOP GOVERNMENT FROM LINKING VOTES TO VOTERS: Public officials
now admit they can see how you voted and link it to your name. This issue
affects Colorado, almost all of Washington State, as well as some locations in
California, Hawaii, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee,
Texas, and Virginia and likely other states as well.
In Colorado,
election officials have been trying to cover up this inconvenient (and
unconstitutional) issue, by preventing the public or the media from examining
ballots -- ever, even after elections are over. The Hart brand ballot scanner,
widely used in CO, WA, and TX, affixes a unique identifier bar code to each
ballot. With mail-in ballots, this produces a mechanism for the government or
its vendors to download how you voted into a database.
The Colorado
nonprofit Citizen Center group is now seeking a federal court ruling prohibiting
the government from placing marks on the ballots, or otherwise using mechanisms
to identify your vote choices. This requires no new law; these practices were
put into place in violation of the Colorado Constitution. PRESS RELEASE -
Citizen Center -
http://www.thecitizencenter.org/blog/2012/2/12/supplemental-press-materials-21312-press-conference.html
TWO WAYS TO SEE HOW YOU VOTED:
1) By implanting a unique number or
bar code on each ballot, compromising ballot privacy for millions of absentee
voters at a time;
2) By creating a large number of small voter subsets;
then, identifying sets with homogenous votes. Small subsets are created with
some mail-in and vote-center systems.
Also see article linked below
about Indiana voter privacy theft. This uses a third mechanism, implanted by the
vendors into voting machines at the behest of the state of Indiana. If officials
admit this now in Colorado and Indiana, and citizens found this in Washington
state, one wonders how pervasive vote harvesting is and why this functionality
has been kept secret from the public?
http://www.pal-item.com/article/20120130/NEWS01/201300304/Recount-prompts-vote-center-questions?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE
Recount prompts vote center questions - Fayette County won't use vote
centers in this year because of privacy concerns
..."The bipartisan board
would tell the vendor to cancel a number," [Wayne County Clerk Jo Ann] Stewart
said. "The clerk can't individually go in and cancel a vote. I don't have the
password. Only the vendor has it to protect the integrity of the
election."
Only the vendor? (In Indiana). Only the government? (In
Colorado). The issue of linking vote choices to voter is going to grow much
bigger than Colorado. The core of the Colorado Clerk's arguments revolves around
an abhorrent belief that the government has a right to see how you voted. The
Citizen Center lawsuit correctly argues that under the Colorado Constitution NO
ONE has that right. Indiana is still scratching its head about this.
* *
* * *
If you believe Black Box Voting is doing important work, please
support us with a monthly sponsorship in any amount you choose! You can set that
up here:
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/donate.htmlThis
message was sent to
michae...@att.net from:
Black Box
Voting, Inc. | 330 SW 43rd St Suite K - PMB 547 | Renton, WA
98057
Update Profile:
http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=52123403&l=100140&s=O5CW&m=753132&c=325456Send
To a Friend:
http://app.icontact.com/icp/core/message/forward?m=753132&s=52123403&c=O5CW&cid=325456