Thanks for the information Hank. Maybe there is hopes that somewhere in future America will be able to rely on these deposits for their porcelain. Do you get similar translucency as with the southern ice pots you showed me before?
> p.s. extrusive (volcanic) primary clays are covered slightly in Cardew
> also.
>
> What is also interesting here is that all kaolins in the USA are
> secondary clays hence
> Hanks and Stannard's use of this material represents the very unusual
> use of primary local clay material (as a clay body) in the USA.
Dear Eric;
When I realised what Stannard was on to, I soon found that there are
deposits of rhyolite all over the West. In desert areas, there has
been little alteration due to the dry climate which prevails there.
In CA, OR, WA, and AK, there has been much hydrothermal alteration
(because of volcanic geysering), leading to the development of
sericite and micaceous minerals. These are plastic and have the right
amount of alkali for a mature body at cone 10 (around 3_4%). In the
absence of hydrothermal or heavy weathering, there would be too much
alkalii content for cone 10 fires..... at least as the main body
ingredient.
The problem as I see it is that potters brought up in the lore of
Western porcelain have been inclined to search for kaolins and
feldspars....... giving extrusive rocks little to no attention. I am
confident that we will find and develop such deposits as soon as many
potters start looking for them. the maps have been drawn..... it
remains for potters to look for the right things.
Cheers, Hank