From: Marko Attila Hoare <mark...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:31:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Dec 10 2007 12:31 am
Subject: Re: Hartmann odgovara Hoareu: Neke vlade smatraju Mladica "politicki osjetljivim bjeguncem" i ne zele ga vidjeti u Haagu
> As you surely know, you could have written : Mladic itself is the
(one > of) evidence of Serbia's involvement in theSrebrenica genocide. So
I don't think this in any way contradicts anything I have written.
> Mladic case itself is challenging Serbia's acquittal by > theInternational Court of Justice. > Therefore and for other reasons the Serbian government will never > allow > him to fall into the ICTY's hands. > Therfore, also, other governments percieve him as a "politically
I am very ready in principle to believe that certain Western
> sensitive fugitive" and would prefer him not to fall into the ICTY's > hands. governments may have conspired to prevent Mladic from being arrested. However, several conditions would need to be fulfilled before one could accept this. Firstly, definite evidence would need to be produced. Secondly, it would need to be explained why Western governments were ready to allow Milosevic to go to the Hague, but not Mladic; Milosevic presumably had more embarrassing evidence than Mladic about Western complicity in the genocide ? Finally, the international community has certainly put pressure on Serbia to deport Mladic, so any Western complicity to keep him from the Hague would be contradictory and inconsistent - which doesn't mean there hasn't been such complicity, but the contradiction would need to be explained. > Nevertheless, he is suspected for the worst crimes committed on the
I don't accept this. Momcilo Perisic was merely a corps commander
> European soil since WWII. So there are no reason however politically > important/crucial they may be that can prevent his arrest. All States > have > the legal obligation to bring about the apprehension of Mladic (as > for > Karadzic) in accordance with the ICTY statute (Article 29) and in > accordance with the Convention on the prevention and punishment of > genocide > which 59th anniversary is in few hours. > Florence Hartmann
> PS : By the way, and not with the intention to contest your remark but
during the JNA's aggressiona against Bosnia; he wasn't even listed in the Milosevic indictments as a member of the 'joint criminal enterprise'; he didn't become Yugoslav Army Chief of Staff until more than a year after the Yugoslav Army withdrew from Bosnia. Therefore, he cannot be considered as a member of the leadership in Belgrade that planned the aggression against Croatia and Bosnia. Jovica Stanisic played a somewhat more important role, and is the most
One could say something similar about Arkan, Seselj and Simatovic:
The architects of the war; the leaders who planned and carried out the
The people of Croatia and Bosnia have not received justice. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||