Warnings about nuclear proliferation at opening of meeting in Vienna

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Pastor Dale Morgan

unread,
Apr 30, 2007, 3:18:38 PM4/30/07
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
*Perilous Times*

Monday April 30, 10:28 PM

*Warnings about nuclear proliferation at opening of meeting in Vienna
*

The United States called for cracking down on nations that withdraw from
the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, as North Korea did, at an NPT
conference that opened in Vienna Monday.

"It is important . . . for us to make such withdrawal more unattractive
before any other State Party violator is tempted to follow such a
course," US head of delegation Christopher Ford told the 188-nation
meeting, which gathered as the Iranian nuclear crisis escalated.

"Let us not mince words, the NPT is in a serious crisis today," Austrian
Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik said in an opening address.

The meeting on the landmark 1970 NPT came with Iran under UN sanctions
for failing to stop uranium enrichment and as an agreement to dismantle
North Korea's nuclear program, which unlike Iran has actually produced
atomic bombs, has stalled.

Japanese ambassador Yukiya Amano, the chairman of the meeting in Vienna,
said: "It is no secret that the NPT has had serious challenges," adding
that "issues related to the DPRK (North Korea) and Iran have become more
pressing."

The international community "cannot afford to be complacent," Amano said.

Plassnik proposed setting up a multilateral, international nuclear fuel
bank so that there "should no longer (be) concern about potential
misuses of fuel" for military purposes by individual nations, such as Iran.

Ford said states that withdraw from the NPT, thus freeing themselves
from UN inspections, should "remain accountable for violations".

He also said the UN nuclear watchdog the International Atomic Energy
Agency should have the authority "to terminate assistance and withdraw
any material or equipment" made available by the agency or a nation to
help with peaceful nuclear development.

The NPT, which went into effect at the height of the Cold War and was
extended indefinitely in 1995, is reviewed every five years. The last
such meeting in 2005 failed to resolve any key questions, with
non-aligned countries and nuclear powers bickering over an agenda.

Such delays threatened to hurt the Vienna meeting however as Iran was
holding up adoption of an agenda, objecting to items on compliance with
IAEA safeguards and on penalties against withdrawing from the NPT.

The Vienna meeting is the first of a series of preparatory sessions
ahead of the next overall review in 2010.

Beyond the proliferation concerns raised by Iran and North Korea, there
is also concern that the NPT, a deal under which nuclear weapons states
agree to disarm while those nations without the bomb agree not to seek
it, is threatened by the new US strategy to use pre-emptive force if
judged necessary and Britain's upgrading of its nuclear arsenal.

Experts agree that the NPT is ill adapted to the modern era, where
so-called rogue states seek to acquire a nuclear weapons capacity by
first developing peaceful programs under the terms of the treaty.

Proposed fixes include having all states sign on to tougher UN
inspections under an Additional Protocol to the NPT.

North Korea withdrew from the NPT in 2003, shortly after kicking out
United Nations inspectors. Pyongyang tested an atomic bomb last October.

Iran justifies its nuclear work under Article IV of the NPT, which
guarantees "the inalienable right . . . to develop research, production
and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes."

But the United States charges that Iran is using this as a cover for the
secret development of nuclear weapons, something that is banned by the
treaty.

There are believed to be nine nuclear weapons states.

They are the five allowed under the NPT -- Britain, China, France,
Russia and the United States; North Korea which withdrew from the
treaty; and three nuclear states -- India, Israel and Pakistan -- which
have refused to sign it.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages