Anglican Church fears lawsuits over gay rights

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pastor Dale Morgan

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 5:12:05 PM9/7/07
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
* Perilous Times and Decaying Morality

Anglican Church fears lawsuits over gay rights*

By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent
Last Updated: 8:26am BST 07/09/2007

Church leaders expressed fears last night that Christians could be sued
under proposed new laws to protect gays from harassment.

Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams: Church fears discrimination
over gay rights
Church: Proposed harassment laws are unnecessary

The Government is proposing to introduce the laws to protect individuals
from hostile or humiliating “environments” as part of an overhaul of
discrimination legislation.

But Christian lawyers and the Church of England warned that Christians
could face legal action if they offended gays by expressing the
traditional teaching that homosexual sex was immoral.

The row follows the bitter battle last year over the Sexual Orientation
Regulations, which many Christians fear will erode religious freedom and
are part of a growing secularisation of society.

The Lawyers’ Christian Fellowship said that the new proposals, which may
be included in a Single Equality Bill, could allow gays to sue if they
heard a sermon that condemned homosexuality.

It added that while a church could “gently refuse membership” to an
unrepentant, practising homosexual, “that person, if they felt that they
had been put in a 'humiliating position’, could sue the Church.”

The Fellowship also warned that suggestions that local authorities
should have a duty to promote gay equality could be “taken too far” and
result in state funding being removed from Christian projects.

The Church of England, in its official submission to the Government’s
consultation on the Bill, said the proposed harassment laws were
unnecessary.

If such legislation was introduced, however, it would be “crucial” to
ensure that a religion’s followers, and not just clergy, could continue
“to express the views of their faith about homosexual conduct, including
challenging people to lead lives consistent with the teaching of the Church.

"To deny Christians (and followers of other faiths which take a similar
view) such a right would amount to an unjustified interference with the
right to manifest religious belief.”

The Church added that the proposals “should not prevent church schools
from continuing to teach in accordance with such a school’s religious
ethos.”

Government plans to extend the same harassment laws to religion and
belief were also criticised.

The Church said it could lead to people objecting to religious symbols
such as crosses on hospital walls on the grounds that they were an
affront to atheists.

It added that the proposals were in danger of undermining religious freedom.

"We have been concerned at what has seemed in some recent debates to be
a trend towards regarding religion and belief as deserving of a lesser
priority in discrimination legislation than the other strands where the
law seeks to bring protection,” it said.

Religion and belief seemed to be treated as subordinate to other rights
because they were deemed to be a personal choice, but this was “a false
analysis”, it continued.

"Nor is religious equality achieved by the elimination of expressions of
religious belief in public institutions such as schools or local
authorities.

"This does not amount to, or achieve, equal respect for different
religious groups and those of no religion; rather it amounts to an
enforced secularism that fails to respect religious belief at all.”

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages