Russia modernizes its superpowerful Bulava missile to crush USA’s ABM system
Pastor Dale Morgan
Russia modernizes its superpowerful Bulava missile to crush USA’s ABM
system*
18.02.2007
Russia-U.S. relations are again begin to resemble the Cold War era. The
latest developments indicate a cold front taking shape. The politicians
do not seem to care much about global warming. In the past, the problems
in the relations between the two nations had to do with a political
rivalry. Nowadays the problems mostly relate to a military sphere.
Military rivalry has always played an important part in the
international relations. Russia and the U.S. used to be engaged in a
sort of competition on the world market of arms and military equipment
by actively supplying them to a number of regimes at the Middle East and
Asia. Now the rule of the game is based on an equal reaction taken by
one party for every action of the other one. It is hard to tell who set
the ball in motion. By and large, Russia had moved forward slowly yet
consistently in the past, without taking note of any other competitors.
Russian military strategists still use the term “indicated enemy” for
referring exclusively to the U.S. Likewise, U.S. military uses the same
term in relation to Russia. The plans for the development of
anti-missile defense system announced by U.S. President Bush were
probably the first step that led to the latest round of escalation in
terms of military rivalry.
Russia strongly objected to the move yet the U.S. remained adamant.
Russia responded by making a number of highly publicized statements
regarding inefficiency of the proposed anti-missile defense system.
Russia also promised to deal an “asymmetrical but very effective blow.”
The steps actually concerned the implementation of a national nuclear
re-armament plan. Specifically, the plan envisioned that such new
ballistic missiles as Topol-M and Bulava enter service in the
foreseeable future. The Bulava is Russia’s newest ballistic missile,
developed and built using the latest technologies. It is designed to
easily overcome any anti-missile defense system.
The Bulava was supposed to be deployed on nuclear submarines. In other
words, it was supposed to become a mobile weapon. The enemy would have
to build a wide net of anti-missile defense system for covering North
America from coast to coast. In response to Russia’s plans, the U.S.
decided to deploy assets of its anti-missile defense system in Poland
and Czech Republic. The reasons behind the deployment of the system are
obvious. The system will be capable of intercepting Iran’s ballistic
missiles only if they should fly across Russia’s airspace. The latest
test launch of the Bulava that failed for a third time in the last four
months seemed to become Russia’s reply to the U.S. plans.
The test launch of the Bulava ended in failure on December 24. Shortly
after the incident, Kommersant, a leading business daily, reported that
“two special commissions were set up to investigate the causes of the
failed test launches.” The first commission will deal with technical
issues directly related to the launches, while the other one will try to
locate the origin of a leak to the press about the failure of the
Bulava. Well, to say a “leak” is to say nothing. The whole world became
aware of the three unsuccessful launches of the Bulava. The previous two
unsuccessful launches occurred September 7 and October 25, RIA Novosti
reported. The missiles were launched from a ballistic missile submarine
in the White Sea. The first missile failed to reach its target, and the
second self-destructed after deviating from its trajectory.
The Bulava was supposed to become a powerful weapon that can be launched
from any location around the globe. One missile is capable of
destructing about ten targets, each the size of a city. The R-30
(SS-NX-30) intercontinental ballistic missile was developed on the basis
of the Topol-M, a similar land-based missile. The Bulava were to be
deployed on new submarines of Borei class. One submarine will carry 12
missiles aboard. The Bulava is equipped with 10 warheads; each of the
warheads can be programmed for independent target acquisition. In other
words, one submarine will be capable of hitting 120 targets while
operating in any part of the world, the Arctic and Antarctic inclusive.
However, the three unsuccessful test launches occurred in a row
following the four successful ones. The Bulava missile was developed at
the Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology. A team of designers and
engineers was headed by Yuri Solomonov. The team was previously involved
in the development of the Topol-M. According to Solomonov, the Bulava
was designed to become a modified version of the Topol-M that would
enable the government to significantly cut production costs. That is why
all the tests were carried out at sea. There were no test launches on
land. Besides, the above design bureau has never developed naval
missiles. The test program went off without a hitch until last year. The
latest series of failures put in jeopardy the plans for the deployment
of the Bulava in 2007. The Russian military will have to conduct from 12
to 14 successful test launches of Bulava missiles prior to commissioning
them as the naval component of Russia’s strategic nuclear forces, said
Anatoly Perminov, head of the Federal Space Agency, in an interview to
Kommersant.
Many analysts pointed out a direct link between the Bulava deployment
plans and President Putin’s second presidency, which is drawing to a
close. The Americans are confident that “there was no lack of funding
for Russia’s state weapons procurement program. In a situation when the
world oil prices are on the increase, and Russia has become one of the
world’s largest energy exporters, the Russian government is spending a
record amount of money on the modernization of strategic missiles. The
funds currently allocated for the purpose exceed the total spending over
the last 25 years,” United Press International reports. As for those
responsible for spreading secret information, steps have been taken too.
According to the Russian media, three officers with the Russian Defense
Ministry and naval headquarters were discharged from service several
days after the first reports about the December 24 failure were
published. The officers reportedly leaked information to the press.
Arguments and Facts
Translated by Guerman Grachev
Pravda.ru