Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
PC Magazine Calls For All, Both Small And Great To Receive Microchip Implant
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile  
 More options Jan 14 2008, 8:54 am
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:54:22 -0800
Local: Mon, Jan 14 2008 8:54 am
Subject: PC Magazine Calls For All, Both Small And Great To Receive Microchip Implant
*Big Brother and The Mark Of The Beast

PC Magazine Calls For All, Both Small And Great To Receive Microchip
Implant*

Lance Ulanoff

It's high time we embraced RFID technology in all its permutations, even
personal implants.

by Lance Ulanoff

I'm surprised by both the debate over RFID (radio frequency
identification) and the technology's growing capabilities. RFID has been
a boon to corporations with large retail outlets, inventory rooms,
warehouses, and more. It's even beginning to bleed into public spaces
such as county beaches. Yet it seems all I hear is moaning about the
privacy and First Amendment implications. This is growing tiresome, and
it's time to set people straight.

RFID chips are a good idea. RFID chips that can help locate people and
objects are a better idea. RFID chips implanted in pets and people are
the best idea of all. Let me illustrate how committed I am to this idea.

I have two children, a boy and a girl. When my son was born 12 years
ago, the obstetrician asked within hours of his birth if I wanted to
have him circumcised. This is a common practice for boys, so I didn't
hesitate to say yes. Of course, it is a medical procedure, and in
hindsight, I wish I'd thought about it for more than 35 seconds.

Now imagine a world where the doctor had, instead, asked me if I wanted
my son "chipped." Here's how that conversation might have gone:

Doctor: "Mr. Ulanoff, it's a simple and virtually painless procedure."

Me: "You mean there's no cutting? No blood?"

Doctor: "Well, no. There is cutting and blood, but it's a small incision
and there's very little blood."

Me: "Sounds like it'll hurt my son."

Doctor: "We use a local anesthetic, and the RFID implant will mean your
child can be readily identified in the hospital."

Me: "What? Wait. Why would he need it here in the hospital? Are you
telling me that babies have been stolen from here?"

Doctor: "Ahem. Er, no. But in the extremely unlikely event that your son
is, uh, snatched, he would never make it through the hospital doors
because his chip would be synced with your wrist bracelet. If your child
left the building without you and your bracelet, which also has RFID, an
alarm would sound."

Me: "Um, well, 'chipping' him seems kind of extreme for tracking him
while he's in the hospital. I mean, he's only here a day and a half."

Doctor: "True, Mr. Ulanoff, but your son will benefit from the chip
after he leaves the hospital, as will you and your wife. This RFID chip
has GPS, a unique identifier, and near-field communication. There's even
talk of adding credit card info when he turns 21, so he can shop by
waving his arm over the check-out counter."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google