Scientist says Putin's Russia worse than under Stalin
Pastor Dale Morgan
Scientist says Putin's Russia worse than under Stalin*
Reuters
Sunday, May 6, 2007; 6:27 AM
MOSCOW (Reuters) - The pursuit of science in President Vladimir Putin's
Russia is driven by profit alone and there was less government
interference even under Josef Stalin, a Russian Nobel Prize winner said
in a interview.
Vitaly Ginzburg's comments to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper are likely
to put Russia's scientists back on a collision course with the Kremlin.
In March, Russia's Academy of Sciences, founded by Tsar Peter the Great,
spurned a government plan to establish a new supervisory council that
would control the body's finances and include officials from the
presidential administration.
The government says the reform of the Academy is desperately needed to
reverse the continuing brain drain from Russia, make research work
lucrative for a generation of young scientists and help build the
hi-tech economy Putin has set as his goal.
"Of course, in Stalin's times the Academy was under the control of the
central committee of the Communist Party," Ginzburg told the paper.
"But in those days you could come up with an idea and create -- that's
how we put the first Sputnik satellite into space. Now the government
thinks science must bring only income and profit, which is absurd."
"Of course it is about Putin. Our democracy is far from ideal," said
Ginzburg, 90, who shared the 2003 Nobel Prize for physics with fellow
countryman Alexei Abrikosov.
Putin, whose second -- and last -- four-year term ends next year, enjoys
vast popularity nationwide while the economy is fast growing, people's
incomes are rising and state coffers groan from windfall revenues from
booming oil exports.
But critics at home and abroad accuse the Russian leader of backtracking
on democratic reforms and establishing tight control over the
bureaucracy and the economy.
They say he is trying to bring the academy under his sway as well.
Supporters of the reforms say too many institutions are run by cliques
of elderly academics who resist change while promising young scientists
are tempted abroad for better pay and opportunities.
The Academy has boasted dozens of Nobel prize winners in its near
300-year history.