Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Global warming could bring hunger, melt Himalayas
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile  
 More options Apr 1 2007, 7:20 pm
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:20:18 -0700
Local: Sun, Apr 1 2007 7:20 pm
Subject: Global warming could bring hunger, melt Himalayas
*Perilous Times and Global Warming

Global warming could bring hunger, melt Himalayas*

01 Apr 2007 17:00:54 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent

OSLO, April 1 (Reuters) - Global warming could cause more hunger in
Africa and melt most Himalayan glaciers by the 2030s, according to a
draft U.N. report due on Friday which also warns that the poorest
nations are likely to suffer most.

The U.N. climate panel, giving the most authoritative study on the
regional impact of climate change since 2001, also predicts more
heatwaves in countries such as the United States, and damage to coral
including Australia's Great Barrier Reef.

"We are talking about a potentially catastrophic set of developments,"
Achim Steiner, the head of the U.N. Environment Programme, said of the
likely impact of rising temperatures, widely blamed on greenhouse gases
from burning fossil fuels.

"Even a half metre (20 inch) rise in sea levels would have catastrophic
effects in Bangladesh and some island states," he told Reuters.

Scientists and officials from more than 100 countries meet in Belgium
from Monday to review and approve a 21-page summary for policymakers in
the report amid disputes on some findings, including on how far rising
temperatures may contribute to spreading disease.

Among the gloomy forecasts, the report predicts that glaciers in the
Himalayas, the world's highest mountain range, will melt away, affecting
hundreds of millions of people.

"If current warming rates are maintained, Himalayan glaciers could decay
at very rapid rates, shrinking from the present 500,000 square
kilometres to 100,000 square kilometres by 2030s," according to a draft
technical summary.

And disruptions are likely to be felt hardest in poor nations, such as
sub-Saharan Africa and Asia where millions more could go hungry because
of damage to farming and water supplies.

BENEFITS

Still, some nations will see some benefits, according to the draft by
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which draws on work
by 2,500 scientists.

Global farm potential might increase with a rise of 3 degrees Celsius
(5.4 Fahrenheit) in temperatures, before sinking worldwide, it says.
Crops might grow better in nations far from the tropics such as Canada,
Russia, New Zealand or Scandinavia.

But warming will hit rich nations in other ways. The Mediterranean
region might become arid. In the United States, rising seas and storm
surges could "severely affect transportation along the Gulf, Atlantic
and Northern coasts", it says.

The United Nations reckons the report, together with one in February
that concluded it was more than 90 percent likely that recent warming
had a predominantly human cause, will add pressure on governments to do
more to head off damaging change.

"We've passed the tipping point," Steiner said, adding that the public,
governments and businesses seemed convinced that global warming was a
major threat and not some vague theory about which scientists disagreed.

"It's no longer about whether (climate change) is happening but about
how we deal with it," he said.

Even so, talks on a global treaty to extend the Kyoto Protocol on
restricting greenhouse gases after 2012 are stalled. Of the world's top
emitters -- the United States, China, Russia and India -- only Russia is
bound by caps under Kyoto.

Talks in Brussels are likely to last long and late, according to James
McCarthy, professor of biological oceanography at Harvard University who
was co-chair the last time the IPCC made a similar report in 2001.

He predicted disagreements would be overcome. "I think it would be very
unlikely that final agreement would not be reached in Brussels," he
said. "It would be unprecedented."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »