Building a New World Order for the Man of Sin
Pastor Dale Morgan
Building a New World Order for the Man of Sin*
By Thomas Horn Sunday, June 7, 2009
Canada Free Press
Author of the upcoming book, Apollyon Rising
“The outcome of the ‘secret destiny’ is a World Order ruled by a King
with supernatural powers. This King was descended of a divine race; that
is, he belonged to the Order of the Illumined for those who come to a
state of wisdom then belong to a family of heroes-perfected human
beings.”—Manly P. Hall, The Secret Destiny of America.
Events unfolding since 9/11 portend a near future in which a man of
superior intelligence, wit, charm, and diplomacy will emerge on the
world scene as a savior. He will seemingly possess a transcendent wisdom
that enables him to solve problems and to offer solutions for many of
today’s most perplexing issues. His popularity will be widespread and
his fans will include young and old, religious and non-religious, male
and female. Talk show hosts will interview his colleagues, news anchors
will cover his movements, scholars will applaud his uncanny ability at
resolving what has escaped the rest of us, and the poor will bow down at
his table. He will, in all human respects, appeal to the best idea of
society. But his profound comprehension and irresistible presence will
be the result of an invisible network of thousands of years of
collective knowledge. He will, like the god Vulcan, represent the
embodiment of a very old super-intellegent spirit. As Jesus Christ was
the “seed of the woman” (Gen. 3:15), he will be the “seed of the
serpent.” Moreover, though his arrival in the form of a man was foretold
by numerous Scriptures, the broad masses will not immediately recognize
him for what he actually is—paganism’s ultimate incarnation; the “beast”
of Revelation 13:1.
It’s been assumed for centuries that a prerequisite for the coming of
Antichrist would be a “revived” world order—an umbrella under which
national boundaries dissolve, and ethnic groups, ideologies, religions,
and economics from around the world, orchestrate a single and dominant
sovereignty. At the head of the utopian administration, a single
personality will surface. He will appear to be a man of distinguished
character, but will ultimately become “a king of fierce countenance”
(Dan. 8:23). With imperious decree he will facilitate a one-world
government, universal religion, and global socialism. Those who refuse
his New World Order will inevitably be imprisoned or destroyed until at
last he exalts himself “above all that is called God, or that is
worshiped, so that he, as God, sitteth in the temple of God, showing
himself that he is God” (2 Thess. 2:4).
For many years the notion of an Orwellian society where one-world
government oversees the smallest details of our lives and in which human
liberties are abandoned was considered anathema.
The idea that rugged individualism would somehow be sacrificed for an
anesthetized universal harmony was repudiated by America’s greatest
minds. Then, in the 1970’s, things began to change. Following a call by
Nelson Rockefeller for the creation of a “New World Order,” presidential
candidate Jimmy Carter campaigned, saying, “We must replace balance of
power politics with world order politics.” This struck a chord with
international leaders including President George Herbert Walker Bush,
who in the 1980s began championing the one-world dirge, announcing over
national television that the time for “a New World Order” had arrived.
The invasion into Kuwait by Iraq/Babylon provided perfect cover for
allied forces to engage the Babylonian “prince” by launching Desert
Storm against Saddam Hussein’s forces, an effort Bush made clear was “to
forge for ourselves and for future generations a New World Order… in
which a credible United Nations can use its… role to fulfill the promise
and vision of the U.N.’s founders.” Following this initial statement,
Bush addressed the Congress where he added:
“What is at stake is more than one small country [Kuwait], it is a big
idea—a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in
common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind…. Such is a
world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future…. the
long-held promise of a New World Order…” [1]
Ever since the President’s astonishing newscast, the parade of political
and religious leaders in the United States and abroad pushing for a New
World Order has multiplied. Britain’s Prime Minister Tony Blair in a
speech delivered in Chicago, April 22, 1999, said frankly, “We are all
internationalists now, whether we like it or not.” Blair could barely
have imagined how quickly his doctrine would catch on. By December 9,
2008, respected chief foreign affairs columnist for The Financial Times,
Gideon Rachman (who attended the 2003 and 2004 Bilderberg meetings at
Versailles, France, and Stresa, Italy) admitted, “I have never believed
that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. I have
never seen black helicopters hovering in the sky above Montana. But, for
the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world
government is plausible.” The United Kingdom’s Gordon Brown not only
agreed, but in an article for The Sunday Times, March 1, 2009, said it
was time “for all countries of the world” to renounce “protectionism”
and to participate in a new “international” system of banking and
regulations “to shape the 21st century as the first century of a truly
global society.” On January 1, 2009, Mikhail Gorbachev, the former head
of state of the USSR, said the global clamor for change and the election
of Barack Obama was the catalyst that might finally convince the world
of the need for global government. In an article for the International
Herald Tribune, he said:
“Throughout the world, there is a clamor for change. That desire was
evident in November, in an event that could become both a symbol of this
need for change and a real catalyst for that change. Given the special
role the United States continues to play in the world, the election of
Barack Obama could have consequences that go far beyond that country…
“If current ideas for reforming the worlds financial and economic
institutions are consistently implemented, that would suggest we are
finally beginning to understand the important of global governance.”
Four days later on January 5, 2009, the chorus call for a New World
Order was ramped up by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger while
on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. A reporter for CNBC asked
Kissinger what he thought Barack Obama’s first actions as President
should be in light of the global financial crises. He answered, “I think
that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this
period, when really a New World Order can be created.” Kissinger
followed on January 13th, with an opinion piece distributed by Tribune
Media Services titled The Chance for a New World Order. Addressing the
international financial crises inherited by Barack Obama, Kissinger
discussed the need for an international political order (world
government) to rise and govern a new international monetary and trade
system. “The nadir of the existing international financial system
coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe,” he
wrote. “The alternative to a new international order is chaos.”
Kissinger went on to highlight Obama’s extraordinary impact on the
“imagination of humanity,” calling it “an important element in shaping a
New World Order.” [2] Kissinger—a Rockefeller functionary and member of
the Bilderberg group and Trilateral Commission who routinely turns up in
lists among senior members of the Illuminati—peppered his article with
key phrases from Masonic dogma, including the comment about the
“alternative to a new international order is chaos,” a clear reference
to “Ordo ab Chao” from Ancient Craft Masonry, a reference to the
doctrine of “Order out of Chaos.” Like the mythical Phoenix firebird,
Kissinger visualized the opportunity for a New World Order to be
engineered from the ashes of current global chaos, exactly the point he
had made years earlier at the Bilderberger meeting in Evian, France, May
21, 1991 when describing how the world could be manipulated into
willingly embracing global government. He said:
“Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to
restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true
if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real
or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all
peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from
this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented
with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for
the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world
government.” [3]
During his second inaugural address, U.S. President George W. Bush
likewise envisioned the specter of a Babylonian-like One World
Government. With an almost religious tone he cited Masonic script,
saying, “When our Founders declared a new order of the ages . . . they
were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled.” [4] New
Age guru Benjamin Creme was clearer still on how the marriage of
politics and religion would epitomize the New World Order when he said
some years ago, “What is the plan? It includes the installation of a new
world government and a new world religion under Maitreia” (Maitreia is a
New Age “messiah”). [5] Five-time United States Senator from Arizona and
Republican Presidential nominee in 1964, Barry Goldwater likewise
foresaw the union of politics and religion as a catalyst for global
government. In writing of the efforts of behind-the-scenes groups
including international bankers to bring about a New World Order, he
said it would occur through consolidating “the four centers of
power—political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical.” As the
managers and creators of the new (prophetic) system, this power elite
would “rule the future” of mankind he believed. [6] So concerned was
Goldwater with the consolidation of government policy and religious
creed that on September 16, 1981 he took the unique position of warning
political preachers from the floor of the US Senate that he would “fight
them every step of the way if they [tried] to dictate their [religious
ideas] to all Americans in the name of conservatism.”
The increasing influence of the Religious Right on the Republican Party
was bothersome to Goldwater in particular because of his libertarian
views. It should have concerned theologians as well, and I say this as a
man often associated with the Religious Right. Combining religious faith
with politics as a legislative system of governance hearkens the formula
upon which Antichrist will come to power (note how in the Book of
Revelation chapter 13 the political figure of Antichrist derives
ultranational dominance from the world’s religious faithful through the
influence of an ecclesiastical leader known as the False Prophet).
Neither Jesus nor his disciples (who turned the world upside down
through preaching the Gospel of Christ, the true “power of God”
according to Paul) ever imagined the goal of changing the world through
supplanting secular government with an authoritarian theocracy. In fact,
Jesus made it clear that his followers would not fight earthly
authorities purely because His Kingdom was “not of this world” (John
18:36). While every modern citizen—religious and non-religious—has
responsibility to lobby for moral good, combining the mission of the
Church with political aspirations is not only unprecedented in New
Testament theology—including the life of Christ and the pattern of the
New Testament Church—but, as Goldwater may have feared, a tragic scheme
concocted by sinister forces to defer the Church from its true power
while enriching insincere bureaucrats, a disastrous fact that only now
some are beginning to understand.
Behind these scenes and beyond view of the world’s uninitiated members,
the alchemy and rituals of the occult masters—Illuminatists, Masons,
Bonesmen, Bilderbergers and Bohemians—have combined to harmonize so
completely within recent U.S. foreign and domestic policies as to
clearly point to a terrifying Sibyl’s conjure, a near future horizon
upon which a leader of indescribable brutality will appear. Although
this false prince of peace will seem at first to hold unique answers to
life’s most challenging questions, ultimately he will make the combined
depravities of Antiochus Epiphenes, Hitler, Stalin, and Genghis Khan,
all of whom were types of the Antichrist, look like child’s play. He
will raise his fist, “speaking great things.... in blasphemy against
God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in
heaven” (Rev. 13:5-6). He will champion worship of the “old gods” and
“cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should
be killed” (Rev. 13:15), and he will revive an ancient mystery religion
that is “the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit,
and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird” (Rev. 18:2).
Nevertheless . . . the world is readied . . . indeed hungry for . . . a
political savior to arise now with a plan to deliver mankind from upheaval.
Footnotes:
1. President George H.W. Bush Address before a joint session of the
Congress on the State of the Union, January 29, 1991
2.
3. Transcribed from a tape recording made by one of the Swiss delegates
4. U.S. President George W. Bush, January 20, 2005, second inaugural address
5. Pat Robertson, THE NEW WORLD ORDER, (Dallas, TX: Word Publishing,
1991) pg 5
6. Barry M. Goldwater, With no apologies: The personal and political
memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater, pg 284, Morrow; 1st
edition (1979)