Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
CO2 emissions rise outpaces worst-case scenario
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile  
 More options May 22 2007, 1:28 pm
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:28:48 -0700
Local: Tues, May 22 2007 1:28 pm
Subject: CO2 emissions rise outpaces worst-case scenario
*Perilous Times and Global Warming

CO2 emissions rise outpaces worst-case scenario*

Hilary Osborne
Tuesday May 22, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

Worldwide CO2 emissions rose at a faster rate in 2000-2004 than the
worst-case scenario imagined in this year's UN reports on climate,
according to new research.

The rise over the first four years of this century is also greater than
in the 1990s - 3.1% a year between 2000-2004, up from an average of 1.1%
a year during the 1990s.

This is faster than scenarios developed by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC), suggesting even its most alarming predictions
of the effects of climate change may not tell the whole story.

Article continues
In a paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, scientists said the accelerating growth rate was largely
due to the increasing energy intensity of economic activity, with
growing populations and economies also having an impact.

The research noted a reversal of the trend towards greater energy
efficiency and lower carbon working seen in the 1990s.

"The trends relating energy to economic growth are definitely headed in
the wrong direction," said Chris Field, one of the authors of the report
and director of the Carnegie Institution's Department of Global Ecology.

"Despite the scientific consensus that carbon emissions are affecting
the world's climate, we are not seeing evidence of progress in managing
those emissions in either the developed or developing countries. In many
parts of the world, we are going backwards."

The American, British, Australian and French scientists behind the study
found that the acceleration of carbon dioxide emissions was greatest in
the rapidly expanding economies of developing countries, particularly China.

In 2004, 73% of the growth in global emissions came from developing
economies, which comprise 80% of the world's population. However, when
the scientists looked at total emissions for the year, they found
developed countries, including the former Soviet Union, contributed
about 60%.

These same countries have been responsible for 77% of CO2 emissions
since the start of the industrial revolution, the report said.

Dr Field said that in order to manage emissions while growing their
economies, countries would have to look for ways to reduce the energy
intensity of their industries and the carbon intensity of their energy
supplies.

"Solving the first part of the puzzle requires shifting more of the
economy toward activities like service industries and information
technology, where emissions can be lower, as well as emphasising energy
efficiency," he said.

"Solving the second requires deploying new sources of non-emitting
energy like wind, solar, and nuclear power."

In three papers this year, scientists on the IPCC have outlined the main
causes of climate change, laying most of the blame at the door of
humans. They warned that failure to tackle emissions could have
devastating effects on many areas of the world.

In the first report, published in February, the IPCC warned there would
be a 0.2C rise in temperatures every decade even if emissions stayed at
2000 levels.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google