Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Lesbian couple who wanted baby sue over twins
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile  
 More options Sep 20 2007, 7:43 pm
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:43:37 -0700
Local: Thurs, Sep 20 2007 7:43 pm
Subject: Lesbian couple who wanted baby sue over twins
*Perilous Times and Decaying Morality

Lesbian couple who wanted baby sue over twins*

By James Grubel
Reuters
Thursday, September 20, 2007; 10:30 AM

CANBERRA (Reuters) - A lesbian couple in Australia are suing their
doctor after they had twin girls from an in vitro fertilization (IVF)
procedure when they only wanted one child.

The two women are seeking more than A$400,000 ($340,000) in damages to
help pay for the cost of raising the second child, including private
school fees, saying they had made it clear to their doctor that they
only wanted one baby.

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other
inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site.
Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by
someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will
take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards,
terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this
site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and
discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The twins are now 3 years old and the civil case, the first of its kind
in Australia, has prompted debate about the value of children and the
role of parents.

"The litigation involving twins already 3 years old undermines the
importance of parenthood," conservative government Senator Guy Barnett
said on Thursday.

"We seem more intent on preserving and pandering to the wishes of adults
than we are in protecting the rights of children," he said.

Barnett called for banning same-sex couples and unmarried women from
access to publicly funded IVF services, sparking a new moral debate
ahead of national elections due within months.

The case is being heard in Canberra, where letters published in the
local Canberra Times newspaper overwhelmingly criticized the legal
action after the birth of two healthy children.

"The child's identity is subsumed to the whim of the mother who has
bought the sperm and paid the IVF clinic," newspaper columnist Angela
Shanahan wrote in the Australian.

"Ultimately the result is the child as product, robbed of its unique
identity."

The court has ordered a gag on the identity of the women, who used donor
sperm from a Danish doctor for the IVF treatment in 2003 which resulted
in the birth of twin girls.

The court has heard that they signed a consent form to allow two embryos
to be implanted, but specifically told their specialist they only wanted
one embryo implanted.

The court was told the birth of the twins had created considerable
stress within the couple's relationship, but lawyers for the doctor said
that almost every couple who had a child went through similar strain.

Late on Thursday trial judge Annabelle Bennett adjourned the case for a
month, when she will consider final written submissions.

But the couple issued a statement to hit back at critics, saying the
legal action had nothing to do with their love for their twin girls, but
was about the doctor's failure to comply

"This has never been a case about whether our children are loved. They
are cherished," they wrote in a handwritten statement issued to media
covering the case.

($1=A$1.17)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google