Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Fingerprinting and eye scans for UK children as young as five
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile
 More options Jun 19 2007, 12:10 am
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:10:53 -0700
Local: Tues, Jun 19 2007 12:10 am
Subject: Fingerprinting and eye scans for UK children as young as five
*Big Brother and and The Police State*

18 June 2007

*Fingerprinting and eye scans for UK children as young as five*

By Marie Woolf, Political Editor
Published: 18 June 2007

Schools are to get the go-ahead to fingerprint pupils as young as five,
in new measures to be approved by the Government.

Ministers will issue guidance telling schools they have the right to
collect biometric data and install fingerprint scanners.

But the decision has angered opposition MPs who say collecting
fingerprints from children will be a gift to identity thieves.

The guidance will say that personal data, including fingerprints and
eyeball scans, can be collected from pupils and used to monitor
attendance, so long as schools consult parents first and do not share
the data with outside bodies.

Schools will be able to place fingerprint scanners at the entrances to
classrooms, the school gates and even in cafeterias.

Fingerprint and eyeball scans would make it easy for schools to track
children during the day, and tell if they are playing truant, or even
what they have eaten for lunch.

MPs fear that school computers are not secure enough to hold biometric
data safely and will be unable to erase the information from systems
when students have left school.

Civil liberties campaigners accused the Government of wanting to barcode
children and questioned whether the data would be kept from other
government agencies and the police.

Nearly 900,000 children aged 10 to 17 have their genetic information
stored on the police's national DNA database, along with 108 under the
age of 10. The guidance, to be approved by ministers this week, will say
that schools can benefit from using biometrics at entry points to
schools and classrooms as well as to take out library books.

It will warn schools not to give out the sensitive information, telling
them it is governed by the same data-protection laws as children's
addresses and birthdays. But it is understood that schools will not have
to gain written permission from each parent before their child's
fingerprints are taken. The guidance, written by Becta, which advises
the Government on the use of technology in education, will go out to
schools and further education colleges.

The civil rights group Liberty said: "We have some serious concerns that
this biometric data is being collected from children simply for
administrative convenience. We want to know what happens to the data
after the children leave. The police have the right to get into any
database, private or public."

About 200 schools are thought to use fingerprint scans already, but most
have been waiting for the Government to give the go-ahead. Sarah
Teather, the Liberal Democrat education spokesman, said she was
concerned that hackers could access sensitive data and steal children's
identities. She questioned whether schools would be able to erase the
data when children left school.

"We wanted a guarantee that nobody can get hold of this information and
an absolute guarantee that the data would be destroyed," she said. "The
temptation for schools to reveal this sensitive information to the
police will be enormous."

Jim Knight, the schools minister, said he wanted "parents to be fully
engaged with every aspect of their children's education - this will be
at the heart of our guidance.

"I back every headteacher's right to choose technology to improve their
day-to-day running - but it's plain common sense for them to talk to
parents about this and all other issues relating to their pupils.
Schools need to collect pupil personal information... But we are clear
that they have to comply with data protection laws. This means that no
outside organisation can access any information."

Further reading: Lords debate, 19 March, Hansard, column 1008


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google