Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Micro Chip implants for All Military Personnel
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile
 More options Aug 30 2006, 2:51 pm
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:51:26 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 30 2006 2:51 pm
Subject: Micro Chip implants for All Military Personnel
*Perilous Times, Big Brother and The Mark Of the Beast

Micro Chip implants for All Military Personnel*

VeriChip Corporation Now Lobbying Pentagon For Right To Microchip All
Military Personnel

David Francis and Bill Myers, The Examiner

A microchip company with powerful political connections is lobbying
the Pentagon for the right to implant chips under the skins of the
nearly 1.4 million U.S. military personnel. "The potential for this
technology doesn't just stop at the civilian level," Philbin said.
VeriChip hopes that the chips will replace the metal dog tags that
have been worn by U.S. military personnel since 1906.

WASHINGTON - A microchip company with powerful political connections
is lobbying the Pentagon for the right to implant chips under the
skins of the nearly 1.4 million U.S. military personnel.
VeriChip Corp., which is based in Florida and planning to offer its
stock to the public soon, has been one of the most aggressive
marketers of radio frequency identification chips. Company officials
have touted the chips as versatile, able to be used in a variety of
situations such as helping track illegal immigrants or giving doctors
immediate access to patient's medical records.

Now the company is "in discussions" with the Pentagon, spokeswoman
Nicole Philbin said. She added that VeriChip wants to insert the chips
under the skin of the right arms of U.S. servicemen and servicewomen.
The idea is to be able to scan an arm and obtain that person's
identity and medical history.

"The potential for this technology doesn't just stop at the civilian
level," Philbin said.

VeriChip hopes that the chips will replace the metal dog tags that
have been worn by U.S. military personnel since 1906.

The company has political muscle in the form of Tommy Thompson. A
former secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services,
Thompson is a partner at the lobbying law firm of Akin Gump and is a
director of VeriChip.

Thompson said he's sure that the chip is safe and that no one - not
even military personnel, who are required by law to follow orders -
will be forced to accept an implant against his or her will. He has
also promised to have a chip implanted in himself.

But reached for comment Friday, he wouldn't say when he was going to
have the implant.

"I'm extremely busy and I'm waiting until my hospitals and doctors are
able to run some screens," he said.

The technology is not foreign to the Pentagon. The Department of
Defense spent $100 million on similar chips that track supplies and
has also attached microchips to dog tags.

But the idea of implanting the chips in live bodies has some veterans'
groups and privacy advocates worried.

"It needs further study," said Joe Davis, a retired Air Force major
and a spokesman for the D.C. office of the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Liz McIntyre, author of a book critical of the chips, said that
VeriChip is "a huge threat" to public privacy.

"They're circling like vultures for any opportunity to get into our
flesh," McIntyre said. "They'll start with people who can't say no,
like the elderly, sex offenders, immigrants and the military. Then
they'll come knocking on our doors."

The chip also is drawing attention from Congress.

"If that is what the Defense Department has in mind for our troops in
Iraq, there are many questions that need answers," Sen. Patrick Leahy,
D-Vt., said in an e-mail to The Examiner.

"What checks and balances, safeguards and congressional oversight
would there be?" Leahy wrote. "What less-invasive alternatives are
there? What information would be entered on the chips, and could it
endanger our soldiers or be intercepted by the enemy?"

The company is not so sure about the technology, either. According to
company documents, radio frequencies in ambulances and helicopters
could disrupt the chips' transmissions.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, VeriChip also
said it was unsure whether the chip would dislodge and move through a
person's body. It could also cause infections and "adverse tissue
reactions," the SEC filing states.

But Philbin downplayed the danger of the chips.

"It's the size of a grain of rice," she said. "It's like getting a
shot of penicillin."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google