Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Public protest restricted at Florida city's homosex-fest
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Pastor Dale Morgan  
View profile  
 More options Jun 30 2007, 12:08 am
From: Pastor Dale Morgan <dgrmor...@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:08:59 -0700
Local: Sat, Jun 30 2007 12:08 am
Subject: Public protest restricted at Florida city's homosex-fest
*Perilous Times and Decaying Morality

Public protest restricted at Florida city's homosex-fest*

Restrictions planned include sign limits, bullhorn bans

Posted: June 29, 2007

St. Petersburg, Fla., officials are sticking with plans to limit free
speech at the city's homosexual festival this weekend after fighting off
complaints they are creating unconstitutional "free speech zones."

Instead, the city will limit some signs and banners to an area "adjacent
to the Permitted Street Closure Area."

The issue is that generally, court opinions have held "free speech
zones" do not meet requirements of the First Amendment. Thus, the city
is no longer calling the area a "free speech zone," although the same
zoning restrictions will apply.

According to a permit for the weekend's events, anyone who wishes to use
"amplified sound and/or hand held signs and banners that extend beyond
the torso of the person holding them," and "signs/banners on sticks, or
other rigid objects," will still be relegated to a designated area
"adjacent" to the actual event area.

"The forgoing," states the permit, "is not to be considered a limitation
on individuals using any area outside of the Permitted Street Closure to
exercise their First Amendment rights in any lawful manner."

Despite the disclaimer, organizations from both sides of the political
debate see the restriction as a clear limitation on freedom of speech
and contend the permit is not the only problem; the ordinance allowing
for its enforcement is the root issue.

A St. Petersburg spokesman said that the city's only concern is for
public safety.

At last summer's festival, preachers from the Biblical Research Center
in Tampa trailed the parade and paced the festival calling festival
attendees "sodomites," held signs that declared homosexuality an
"abomination," wore T-shirts and shouted slogans through bullhorns that
condemned homosexuality.

Participants in the festival were furious; some pelted the preachers
with beads and drinks and nearly incited riots.

In an attempt to curb a repeat clash, the city council met to create a
system governing outdoor events and proposed a "free speech zone" at the
event, where protesters and demonstrators would be allowed.

The resulting ordinance allows the city to create prior restraints of
speech on an event-by-event basis, with virtually no predictable limits.
It also criminalizes certain free speech behavior around public events
and authorizes the police to enforce breaches of permits – the penalty
for such breaches being arrest.

According to the American Civil Liberties Union and the Alliance Defense
Fund, the ordinance and the permits are far too broad.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Florida sent a letter Monday to
St. Petersburg Mayor Rick Baker and Police Chief Charles Harmon calling
for changes to both the city's ordinance regarding the "free speech
zones" and event permit enforcement.

"This ordinance essentially gives the city the power to violate people's
rights on an event-by-event basis. It's especially unlawful to tell
people where they can speak or can't, simply based on the viewpoint of
the speaker or the content of the speech," said Rebecca Harrison Steele,
director of the ACLU of Florida's West Central Office.

"The streets and sidewalks of the entire city should be a free speech
zone for everyone," Steele said.

Larry Keffer, a Tampa-based street pastor present at last year's event,
contacted the Alliance Defense Fund for legal counsel after hearing of
the proposed restrictions. ADF is a non-profit public interest law firm
focused on First Amendment issues.

In a letter sent to the St. Petersburg mayor and police chief,
ADF-allied attorney Jonathan Scruggs informed the city it could not
"change the character of a traditional public forum simply by creating a
parade permit scheme."

Additionally, stated Scruggs, the protection of public safety should not
require prohibition of all hand-held signs and banners and sound
amplification equipment.

"The ban is simply too broad," he said.

The city responded to pressure from all sides with assurances it would
revise the permits to resolve all of the First Amendment trespasses.

"I can assure you that we're not going to have a free speech zone," Bill
Proffitt, spokesman for the St. Petersburg Police department, said
Wednesday, as the permits were being revised. "I don't think we ever had
them."

"There's been a whole lot of discussion – the city council passed an
ordinance a few months ago that came into play – but the bottom line is
that people can protest anywhere they want as long as they do so
lawfully," Proffitt continued.

But when the text of the permit was finalized, City Attorney John Wolfe
said that it contained only two changes:

* Only during the parade and for a few minutes before and after,
demonstrators may use amplified sound and wave banners of any size, even
in the permitted street closure area. At other times they are restricted
to a single zone.

* Additionally, signs that do not extend beyond the torso and are not
mounted to sticks are permitted anywhere on the festival grounds. Other
signs are limited to the protest zone.

Keffer, unsatisfied with the changes, believes city officials are
submitting to the homosexual agenda.

"I'm disappointed," he said. "The permit sounds essentially the same.
The most coveted right we have is the ability to express opinions on
public property, and the local government cannot usurp the Constitution."

Tthe ACLU said that after the revisions were announced, the officials
called the effort a good first step, but said there still are concerns
about the process.

"A city simply can't shut down all of its streets to free speech because
of a streets closure permit," Scruggs concurred. "Religious speech is
not second-class speech. Even if what they have to say is offensive,
citizens have a right to present their opinions."

Regardless of the restrictions, Keffer, 45, says he has no plans to
confine his protest to a designated area.

"We don't consider ourselves protesters. We will do whatever we need to
do to get the Gospel out," he said.

Atlanta's 'gay' fest plans also originally included a 'free speech zone'

A week earlier, the city of Atlanta faced a similar question over its
pride festival, where a year ago police threatened protesters on public
property if they did not put away signs critical of homosexuality.

But Dick Christensen, an urban missionary familiar with the situation in
Atlanta, reported to WND that last weekend's festival was without incident.

"It was a total about-face from last year" and a "victory for Americans
everywhere," he said.

Rev. Billy Ball, another Atlanta Festival missionary, says he will try
to "help out the boys in St. Petersburg" this weekend.

"We have free speech zones in America," said Ball. "There are 50, and
they're called states."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google