Hummmm, PQ time...
Seriously, I'm talking anyone from core web teams (which are
relatively small, 5 -20 people tops) to people who have
'responsibility' for their website. I know many such of the latter
who probably update their content once a quarter who wouldn't
consider themselves web people, but for the purposes of my
generalisation below, I would.
See you in soho :)
ll
--
Lloyd Davis
Perfect Path Consulting Ltd
Helping people be brilliant in the knowledge economy
http://www.perfectpath.co.uk/
http://tinyurl.com/2zejjs to subscribe to my blog by e-mail
http://feeds.feedburner.com/PerfectPath to subscribe to my blog by RSS
Call me: +44 (0)79191 82825
Skype me: perfectpath
Follow me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/LloydDavis
Anyway, is there a format to the meetings, any particular topic etc? If
I don't know anyone how do I find the meeting?
many thanks
Craig
--
Craig Cockburn ("coburn"). Director, Siliconglen.com Ltd
Web project manager and Internet specialist. CITP. C.Eng
http://www.siliconglen.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/siliconglen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shipping Guides Ltd,
75 Bell St, Reigate, Surrey RH2 7AN, United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 1737 242255
Fax: +44 1737 222449
Email: in...@portinfo.co.uk
WWW: http://www.portinfo.co.uk
Registered in England No. 907386
Registered Office: As above
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential. It is intended for the use
of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee you must not use, copy
or disclose the information contained in it. Please contact us immediately
and delete the e-mail from your computer system and destroy any hard copies
you may have made.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shipping Guides Ltd,
75 Bell St, Reigate, Surrey RH2 7AN, United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 1737 242255
Fax: +44 1737 222449
Email: in...@portinfo.co.uk
WWW: http://www.portinfo.co.uk
Registered in England No. 907386
Registered Office: As above
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential. It is intended for the use
of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee you must not use, copy
or disclose the information contained in it. Please contact us immediately
and delete the e-mail from your computer system and destroy any hard copies
you may have made.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've crossposted this across the Barcamp and MySoc lists as there is a bit
of crossover here.
Sorry if that annoys people.
I received a response to a petition of mine from PMO this morning.
It directed me to this response online
http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page14567.asp
Up there, the PMO response references some further information on
TeacherNet.
But the link given is malformed and points at
http://http//www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/schoolfunding/schoolfundingcon
sultation2007/schoolbalances/
Note the double "http" at the beginning. So it don't work.
When I click it I end up on a domain parking site.
I immediately recognised what had happened, but many 'ordinary' people
wouldn't.
And they are the people who had signed the petition and deserved a response.
IMHO, this communication is not fit for purpose.
So 2 questions:
1) (To Tom & co @MySoc mainly) Shouldn't the petition response editorial
system have handled this and filtered out the malformed link? Or are my
expectations too high?
2) (Mainly to the UKGovWeb people) You are not allowed to blame MySoc for
this. Didn't anyone check/proof what was being sent? Surely an 'important'
piece of communication material should not have escaped from PMO like this?
And given Mark's earlier request for a one-click-multi-stream communication
system, wouldn't an incident like this shut down any such system very, very
quickly?
I now that no one died and that I need to get a life, but, actually, this
really shouldn't happen, should it?
Talk to me, people.
Feargal
> Feargal,
>
> Bingo - it is the immediacy and ease of use that is attractive, but
> without a rigorous set of user conventions and a proper proofing
> practice (alliteration intentional) applied, this kind of slapdash
> thing with happen. And this is where the oft mocked process people
> come in...
>
> > Using digital media is wonderfully easy to do, but its also
> terribly easy to
> > get wrong. It needs to be used with care which, IMHO,
> wasn't done in this
> > case.
> >
> > It's about education, training and skills aagin, I'm afraid.
And a spull chucker might be a useful tool to have on such a shte.