Bertrand Russell eat you heart out! Logic/Math Conjecture in Christianity

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Martin Michael Musatov

<marty.musatov@gmail.com>
unread,
May 17, 2009, 2:22:50 PM5/17/09
to Atheism vs Christianity
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marty Musatov <marty....@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:56:46 -0800
Subject: A Good Measure
To: rkm...@yahoo.com

Book of Kings Chapter 7 verses, the whole chapter, but especialy 7:23
and
7:37, ***Canon reference to pi, reveals (k!)

Read it in peace, no weeping:.
"
"A molten sea", cast of the forests of Lebanon (of seeds) into Cedar
trees
to the House of Solomon. Extending "A molten sea", with a measure
(spoke)(n) to be (30). (Verse)

Commentary: "Hal(f)lway" between corresponding-verses (i.e. ideas,
standing,
in ""a position" (a "pearling") seemingly in opposition to geometry,
science, math.

Consider "Pear(l)ing". Is what you see a baby pear tree or a "pearl-
ing" of
light on the windows of Solomon's House. Perhaps it is both, and this
truly
i(n)aesense a "Pair-ling". A baby coupling in more ways than one,
extending
"per-haps" well beyond t(h)ree. (one in the same) but not "it" is
seen.

What can simultaneously be a grain of sand in an oyester and a seed of
a
tree? One grows straight up like a pole, but eventually crosses like
a
brand into an arrow, a triange, out like an oval, with leaves pushing
towards a shape limited by a ratio(n)?

Once from it comes also the smallest of things, the grain of sand, in
the
oyester's clenched mallet goes on to become him a perfect reflection
of
opure-light. Both it seems Tt[r)tT the same side of Christ. A
reflection
of God born of a man into him.

"After this he made the ten bases; all of them had one casting, one
measure,
and one form." Quoting scriptue. {S} is the[Hebrew character which
mimics
the function. Pushing prime numbers across a string
(left<center>right) to
create points extending out and a soft bracketed-curve to a point
representing Prime-! (factorial).... Alpha to Omega.

I finished my proof for the square root of pi. It is complete. The
equation is as elegant as I had hoped.

(1/2) * ( - k ) * ( k - 1/2 ) * ( - 3 ) / k!

This equation produces

M = k! ( - 3 ) * ( k - 1/2) * ( - k ) * (1/2)

Where M = the bridge between irrational in irrational probability of
integers crossing the stresshold of pi.

PiRoot, I call it. The Royaltree. "EMC".

Solved for Zero and Prime, to 10, at five, it brings 1/3 pi (and above
it
twice and 4 times its ream, before forcing a power of seventeen.

To this there is beautiful illustration in Romans.

*ROMANS 8:35-39
*

which concludes the first great division of the Epistle, and sums up
blessings given by Christ. A series of *seven*, questions all of which
bode
negatively. then a series of *9 answers all respond in exclusion of a
negative possibility*. And finally the *tenth, or the the final
seventh* is
final word given to answer it by its terms. A ruling out of negative
possibility. For if there is a rhythm to scripture and it speaks
easily,
sure this impart is it.

"Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall

1. Tribulation,
2. Or distress,
3. Or persecution,
4. Or famine,
5. Or nakedness,
6. Or peril,
7. Or sword?

And in response:
8. Neither death (1),
9. Nor life (2),
10. Nor angels (3),
11. Nor principalities (4),
12. Nor things present (5),
13. Nor things to come (6),
14. Nor powers (7),
15. Nor height (8),
16. Nor depth (9),
17. Nor any other creature (10)

The formula produces, and converges all numbers in terms of a 17th
power,
but below 1 (at Zero) the {square} root of this "irrational/rational"
number
is naked, as it transcends all variables of measurement and quantity.

If numbers are the language which God speaks, remaining unco-(n)fused
and
protected by our divination, than so to by effect they purify and
unite, not
to misguide or gives us no good reason, from them too can only be good
light.

I've already matched to a great furtherance of the prime fibonacci
sequence
here. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciPrime.html
Doubline it's value and t-ing it back to here
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A000045, Fibonacci
himself.

Four...........!

Good times.

Martin

Drafterman

<drafterman@gmail.com>
unread,
May 17, 2009, 7:06:52 PM5/17/09
to Atheism vs Christianity
And?

On May 17, 2:22 pm, Martin Michael Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> here.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciPrime.html
> Doubline it's value and t-ing it back to herehttp://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A000045, Fibonacci

tonysin

<a2mgoog@yahoo.com>
unread,
May 17, 2009, 7:31:53 PM5/17/09
to Atheism vs Christianity
Thanks for clearing that up.

On May 17, 11:22 am, Martin Michael Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> here.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciPrime.html
> Doubline it's value and t-ing it back to herehttp://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A000045, Fibonacci

watts

<watts.ape@gmail.com>
unread,
May 17, 2009, 8:03:37 PM5/17/09
to Atheism vs Christianity
For a mathematical proof, you've neither defined your parameters/
variables nor given any sort of proof... All I see is some sort of
equation (your two equations don't even match each other) defining
some output for a rational number and claiming its related to pi?

Crazy. (both you and the proof).

On May 17, 11:22 am, Martin Michael Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> here.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciPrime.html
> Doubline it's value and t-ing it back to herehttp://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A000045, Fibonacci

Martin Michael Musatov

<marty.musatov@gmail.com>
unread,
Jun 6, 2009, 8:37:44 PM6/6/09
to Atheism vs Christianity
Read more closely. The second equation is derived from the first. The
first is the square root of pi. The second connects it to the
rationals. Do the math.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages