Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Exercise and secondary lymphedema: safety, potential benefits, and research issues.
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
lymphedemapeople  
View profile  
 More options May 25, 10:04 am
From: lymphedemapeople <lymphedemapeo...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 07:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, May 25 2009 10:04 am
Subject: Exercise and secondary lymphedema: safety, potential benefits, and research issues.
Exercise and secondary lymphedema: safety, potential benefits, and
research issues.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar

Hayes SC, Reul-Hirche H, Turner J.
School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical
Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland,
Australia. sc.ha...@qut.edu.au

PURPOSE: Participating in regular physical activity is encouraged
after treatment for breast cancer, with exception of those who have
subsequently developed lymphedema. The purpose of this project was to
investigate, in a randomized controlled trial, the effect of
participating in a supervised, mixed-type exercise program on
lymphedema status among women with lymphedema after breast cancer.

METHODS: Women younger than 76 yr, who completed breast cancer
treatment at least 6 months prior and had subsequently developed
unilateral, upper-limb lymphedema, were randomly allocated to an
intervention (n = 16) or control (n = 16) group. The intervention
group (IG) participated in 20 supervised, group, aerobic and
resistance exercise sessions over 12 wk, whereas the control group
(CG) was instructed to continue habitual activities. Lymphedema status
was assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy (impedance ratio between
limbs) and perometry (volume difference between limbs), and
independent t-tests (two-tailed P < 0.05) were used to determine
statistical significance of observed changes.

RESULTS: Mean ratio and volume measures at baseline were similar for
the IG (1.13 +/- 0.15 and 337 +/- 307 mL, respectively) and the CG
(1.13 +/- 0.19 and 377 +/- 416 mL, respectively), and no changes were
observed over time for either group. Although no group change was
observed between preintervention and 3-month follow-up for the IG
(ratio and volume change = 0.02 +/- 0.07 and 2 +/- 71 mL,
respectively), two women in this group no longer had evidence of
lymphedema by study end. Average attendance was more than 70% of
supervised sessions, there were no withdrawals, and several
qualitative comments from participants support the program
acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS: The results from this pilot study indicate that, at
minimum, exercise does not exacerbate secondary lymphedema. Women with
secondary lymphedema should be encouraged to be physically active,
optimizing their physical and psychosocial recovery.

Lippincott, Williams & Williams

http://www.acsm-msse.org/pt/re/msse/abstract.00005768-200903000-00001...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google