I will kick this off with a property at 1362 H. The rear is unfenced, and this is a frequent source of all kinds of dumping. The building is abandoned. I have filed 3 service request on this property. The city has cleaned the property a few times and I believe the owner has been fined. I will post a photo later along with the property owner details.
> I will kick this off with a property at 1362 H. The rear is unfenced, > and this is a frequent source of all kinds of dumping. The building > is abandoned. I have filed 3 service request on this property. The > city has cleaned the property a few times and I believe the owner has > been fined. I will post a photo later along with the property owner > details.
Too be clear...it seems that this person is NOT paying the higher tax rate. Is this correct? I have list of properties in my SMD which I will bring on Saturday to share. I used the city property assessment database to look details up on the owners. Is this the proper place to look to see if the property is paying the correct taxes?
On Apr 9, 8:32 pm, "Rob Hudba" <charlesscottelli...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> JAMES T METCALF > Mailing Address: 901 TUCKAWAY TER; FORT WASHINGTON MD20744-6756
> On Apr 8, 9:11 am, "Bill Schultheiss" <schlt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I will kick this off with a property at 1362 H. The rear is unfenced, > > and this is a frequent source of all kinds of dumping. The building > > is abandoned. I have filed 3 service request on this property. The > > city has cleaned the property a few times and I believe the owner has > > been fined. I will post a photo later along with the property owner > > details.
The property sales database on the OTR site will not contain accurate information as far as the current tax rate being applied (and if the last sale was a long time ago, there may be no information on the property).
If you used the .pdf form that OTR had on their website to determine whether the higher tax rate is being applied, I was told that this document was wildly inaccurate--and has since been removed (or is supposed to be removed) from their website.
"Let's work together to make our neighborhood the best it can be!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note that unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this email are my own, and not the views of other ANC 6C Commissioners or the ANC as a whole.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Unfenced Property From: "Bill Schultheiss" <schlthss@gmail.com> Date: Thu, April 12, 2007 1:49 pm To: "H Street NE Nuisance Property Taskforce" <hstreettaskforce@googlegroups.com>
Too be clear...it seems that this person is NOT paying the higher tax
rate. Is this correct? I have list of properties in my SMD which I
will bring on Saturday to share. I used the city property assessment
database to look details up on the owners. Is this the proper place to
look to see if the property is paying the correct taxes?
On Apr 9, 8:32 pm, "Rob Hudba" <charlesscottelli...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> The owner is:
>
> JAMES T METCALF
> Mailing Address: 901 TUCKAWAY TER; FORT WASHINGTON MD20744-6756
>
> On Apr 8, 9:11 am, "Bill Schultheiss" <schlt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I will kick this off with a property at 1362 H. The rear is
unfenced,
> > and this is a frequent source of all kinds of dumping. The building
> > is abandoned. I have filed 3 service request on this property. The
> > city has cleaned the property a few times and I believe the owner has
> > been fined. I will post a photo later along with the property owner
> > details.
>
> > Bill
I've posted the picture of 1362 H St online and I've got the word document with the full details on it. Tonight I am going to go through all of the properties I have documented so far, check their tax status and then send an email to Allen Smith over at DCRA to get him to reclassify vacant and abandonded properties, including 1362, which is currently classified at 002 Commercial when it clearly should be 003 vacant. If I could give a rough guess of how many of the 82 are in the wrong category I would say that a good 60+ are wrong. DC is about to come into a big tax windfall!
> The property sales database on the OTR site will not contain accurate information as far as the current tax rate being applied (and if the last sale was a long time ago, there may be no information on the property).
> If you used the .pdf form that OTR had on their website to determine whether the higher tax rate is being applied, I was told that this document was wildly inaccurate--and has since been removed (or is supposed to be removed) from their website. > Best, > Alan Kimber > Commissioner, ANC 6c05 > (c) 202-390-0235 > (f) 877-765-6928 (toll-free) > Blog:http://anc6c05.blogspot.com > Website:www.alankimber.org > "Let's work together to make our neighborhood the best it can be!" > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please note that unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this email are my own, and not the views of other ANC 6C Commissioners or the ANC as a whole.
> -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Unfenced Property > From: "Bill Schultheiss" <schlt...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, April 12, 2007 1:49 pm > To: "H Street NE Nuisance Property Taskforce" > <hstreettaskforce@googlegroups.com>Too be clear...it seems that this person is NOT paying the higher tax rate. Is this correct? I have list of properties in my SMD which I will bring on Saturday to share. I used the city property assessment database to look details up on the owners. Is this the proper place to look to see if the property is paying the correct taxes? On Apr 9, 8:32 pm, "Rob Hudba" <charlesscottelli...@yahoo.com> wrote:> Bill,>> The owner is:>> JAMES T METCALF> Mailing Address: 901 TUCKAWAY TER; FORT WASHINGTON MD20744-6756>> On Apr 8, 9:11 am, "Bill Schultheiss" <schlt...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > I will kick this off with a property at 1362 H. The rear is unfenced,> > and this is a frequent source of all kinds of dumping. The building> > is abandoned. I have filed 3 service request on this property. The> > city has cleaned the property a few times and I believe the owner has> > been fined. I will post a photo later along with the property owner> > details.>> > Bill
