Steve Palincsar
unread,Jun 7, 2013, 8:50:26 AM6/7/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Leslie Bright, 65...@googlegroups.com, Steve Park, RickCJ...@gmail.com
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 05:43 -0700, Leslie Bright wrote:
> If that logic is strictly adhered to, why want cyclocross tire in 650b
> at all then? Just stick w/ 700c. Or for that matter, why bother
> with clinchers; don't most racers use tubeless?
>
> It's not that the tire would be used in a true cyclocross race, but
> that a cyclocross-like tire is useful for other biking needs...
>
> Clement makes the MSO in 700c-40; plenty of other "cyclocross" tires
> are available as 700c-38 sizes....
>
> So.... yeah, I want to see a 650b clincher "cyclocross" tire in
> wider widths; I want to see the Rock-n-Road in 650b. I want a
> narrower 700c Rock-n-Road, say in a 37....
>
> Do I "expect" such? Eventually... not just from "my" wants, but, from
> companies being able to meet a need and selling some tires that aren't
> duplicating others' efforts....
So maybe calling it a "cyclocross tire" would be clouding the issue and
misleading the manufacturers, just as calling a bike suitable for this
sort of riding a "cyclocross bike" sends manufacturers and builders down
wrong paths -- where you get into arguments such as over whether a bike
can "truly" be a "real" cyclocross bike if it has water bottle mounts
because after all 'cross races are so short nobody has the time to drink
(and no I am not making this sh*te up, we had a virulent argument on
that very point over on the VSalon Forum a year or two ago).