> I know, not exactly a fresh topic, but....

> I've been wavering between doing all my GTD processing and review in
> kGTD and sticking to paper. At this point I'm not even considering any
> other software package for the core of my system, though I've looked
> at various others and also use MailTags and a number of text files. I
> won't be going 100% digital or analog in any case, but I want to be
> able to stick to one or the other at the core.

> Advantages of kGTD: general elegance of both OmniOutliner and kGTD
> itself, pleasure of playing with new toys whenever updates are
> released, iCal sync ability, potential to link into all the other
> capabilities of the computer, laptop is more convenient to carry if I
> want to work at a coffeeshop than a bunch of loose papers and files.

> On the paper side, I've created color-coded paper Project forms that
> I've gradually been refining. The color-coding is according to
> "domains" (business, family/household, community/political, tech,
> etc.) and gives me another dimension along which to organize and make
> in-the-moment decisions on where to place my attention. I haven't
> found a convenient way to replicate this in kGTD, especially once
> actions are synced to iCal (other than to use "domains" in place of
> "contexts", which I don't want to do).

> Advantages of paper: color-coded domains, infinite flexibility,
> arbitrary tactile sorting and stacking of NAs, gives me some relief
> from being in front of the computer screen all the time.

> Since I keep going back and forth, I've ended up copying paper project
> records into kGTD and vice versa more than once, which is obviously
> less than ideal.

> Right now I've been using kGTD for the past few weeks but am leaning
> toward putting everything back into paper.

> I'm not really even sure what I'm asking, but I'm hoping if anyone is
> still interested in discussing it that I might run across some new
> insights.

> Michael

> --
> I never metadata I didn't like.