I suspect he's referring to companies who try to compete with his
speaking and consulting gig, or who try to blur their relationship to
him and his company, although, who knows?
I'm not a lawyer, but I imagine anything on 43 Folders is _well_ within
the protection of fair use. Any lawyers here got an opinion?
What I read David Allen as saying is that GTD promotion (and referral)
is okay, but profiting from GTD -- whether from the copyrighted
materials or the name itself -- is not. Which, as this thread's name
says, is his due, legally and morally.
So we should continue to refer to "GTD" as a David Allen brand, and
link to davidco.com, and thus show whose ideas we are using, adapting,
and spreading. We should also -- and this is more important --
continue to make everything on the 43folders wiki freely available,
under the CC license currently in use, for example.
If we do all this, I infer that David Allen won't have a problem with
what we're doing.
But don't expect me to indemnify you based on my opinion! (See
http://www.silverman-esquire.com/disclaimer.html.)
You know David Allen is a New College alum, too? From one of the first
classes.
Small world, eh?