>> John Fields wrote:
>>> On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:36:06 -0600, hw f <snuhw...@netscape.net>
>>> wrote:

>>>> John Fields wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:29:23 -0600, hw f <snuhw...@netscape.net>
>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>> Phil Hobbs wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/06/2012 12:51 PM, hw f wrote:
>>>>>>>> Phil Hobbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>> [......]

>>>>>>>>> Stew Leonard's Espresso Roast, roasted fresh daily in sunny Yonkers.
>>>>>>>>> Best beans I've ever come across, and worth the trip. Always a crowd
>>>>>>>>> pleaser.

>>>>>>>>> Cheers

>>>>>>>>> Phil Hobbs

>>>>>>>> Sorry to hijack this thread but I have an actual electronics repair
>>>>>>>> question: how do I go about getting my old AIWA CX-NA10 stereo system to
>>>>>>>> read CD's again? Is the lazer bad? It detects the cd and spins up but
>>>>>>>> wont play it.

>>>>>>> You're no fun anymore.

>>>>>>> Cheers

>>>>>>> Phil Hobbs

>>>>>> Uh huh. I fixed it somewhat by fiddling with the screw behind the back
>>>>>> cover. G00gle told me how. You lot are obviously quite useless.

>>>>>> <nods>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Hardly surprising, since your query would have more appropriately been
>>>>> directed to sci.electronics.repair.

>>>> Gee, good thing this thread was never x-posted there, huh?

>>>> <aside>

>>>> Are all the regs of s.e.b this fucking retarded?
>>> ---
>>> Since you chose to use 'this' instead of 'that', you've demonstrated
>>> that you _are_ grammatically challenged, but not yet knowing the exact
>>> level of your retardation, it's impossible to answer your question.

>>> http://www.englisch-hilfen.de/en/grammar/this_that.htm

>> Yeah, we're not doing a thing.

> ---
> Well, you're making mistakes and I'm correcting them, so we're both
> "doing a thing" and, errorwise, so far you're batting 1000.
> ---

>> You can find somebody else's leg to hump.

> ---
> You need to study up on anatomy.