Republicans for TRVTH! in media wrote:
>>> thanks to Repugnicans in Congress.
>>>
>>> Indeed.
>>
>> Bullshit -
>
> Nice sig, but it's in the wrong place.
>
>> "Although the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, which established
>> Amtrak,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak
>
> Seems at least part of the Amtrak story came from Fox News:
>
http://www.foxbusiness.com/industries/2012/08/02/amtrak-food-service-
> lost-834m-in-10-years/
>
> "Fox News" is more widely considered a significantly biased news
> source and an opinion arm of the Repugnican party:
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies
>
http://www.people-press.org/2009/09/13/press-accuracy-rating-hits-two-
> decade-low/
> "Fox: unbalanced favouritism"
>
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Fox_News
What the fuck has Fox News got to do with the FACT that
Amtrak has lost money since year one?
In every year since 1971, Amtrak has lost money.
http://www.statesman.com/business/personal-finance/amtraks-40-year-train-wreck-2377586.html
>> Gov't has NO BUSINESS in Amtrak and it <along with the Post Office>
>> should be shut down or restructured today.
>
> The USPS was pushed into its present financial problems by factors
> that are outside its control. Among those are rules and restrictions
> related to retirement plans imposed by Congress. Repugnicans have,
> to date, refused to do anything to solve that problem:
>
>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/02/usps-postal-service-
> senate_n_1072013.html
Can you really be this retarded and still post?
The house was held by dems for decades until
Clinton/Gingrich.. it's a dem Senate, and that
doesn't count 14 years of a dem president.
Amtrak is NOT a dem or republican clusterfuck,
it's a Washington DC clusterfuck. As is the Post
Office -- pensions promised that can never be
paid for.
>> I suppose there have been no democrats in office since 1970?
>
> Only if I should also suppose you're more ignorant than Michelle
> Bachmann.
Fuck M.B.
>> I suppose you were all for giving Solyndra and GM money?
>
> No, I believe the Bush Administration should have done a better job of
> vetting that particular venture:
>
>
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/09/13/317594/timeline-bush-
> administration-solyndra-loan-guarantee/?mobile=nc
"Ultimately, the Bush administration program didn't finalize
a single loan guarantee."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/nov/17/david-plouffe/solyndra-loan-george-w-bush-david-plouffe/
You should really get your facts straight.