pentagon tells same old lie...
�n�hw��f
[tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like the magic number is
30,not 42 as some would claim:
http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanistan
_keep_killing_exactly_30_people
Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss
^_^
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
thund3rstruck
> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the ObamaRealChange
> [tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like the magic number is
> 30,not 42 as some would claim:
> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanistan
> _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>
> Meet the new boss
> Same as the old boss
>
> ^_^
>
that very few in DC actually give a shit about anything more than
keeping their position. As a result, a good amount of them are lying SOBs.
n0i
thanatoid
news:495a5$4b24363e$4831f3f2$10...@FUSE.NET:
> �n�hw��f wrote:
>> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the
>> ObamaRealChange [tm] admin are increasingly apparent.
>> Seems like the magic number is 30,not 42 as some would
>> claim:
>> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_a
>> fghanistan _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>>
>> Meet the new boss
>> Same as the old boss
>>
>> ^_^
>>
> You're surprised by any of this? I came to the conclusion
> years ago
> that very few in DC actually give a shit about anything
> more than keeping their position. As a result, a good
> amount of them are lying SOBs.
>
> n0i
You're barely scratching the surface. There is NO difference
between the two parties, and ALL politicians' primary job is
lying. Anyone who does anything even close to telling the truth
is gone very quickly, if not immediately.
--
Deep in the night
Flying very strange cargo
Our soul-ships pass by
Solo trips to the stars - in the sky
Gliding so far
That the eye cannot follow
Where do they go
We'll never know...
(B.F.)
thund3rstruck
> thund3rstruck <thund3rstruck_n0i@live> wrote in
> news:495a5$4b24363e$4831f3f2$10...@FUSE.NET:
>> You're surprised by any of this? I came to the conclusion
>> years ago
>> that very few in DC actually give a shit about anything
>> more than keeping their position. As a result, a good
>> amount of them are lying SOBs.
>>
>> n0i
>
> You're barely scratching the surface. There is NO difference
> between the two parties, and ALL politicians' primary job is
> lying. Anyone who does anything even close to telling the truth
> is gone very quickly, if not immediately.
That's pretty much the direction I was going in...
n0i
Bucky Breeder
news:Xns9CDFA193CE4B1...@216.196.97.142:
> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the
> ObamaRealChange [tm] admin are increasingly apparent.
> Seems like the magic number is 30,not 42 as some would
> claim:
> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509
> /why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanistan_keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>
> Meet the new boss
> Same as the old boss
>
> ^_^
It's because there's an embedded informal organization in reality, thus
the rampant allegations of "shadow government" over the years... And the
"Pentagon" is part of that reality; as is the military-industrial complex
who own much of Congress and likey-as-not most of the President(s) as well.
CIA, NSA, DARPA, FEMA, IRS, AARP, SPCA... it's all the same - black suits and
black helicopters everywhere you go now..
On a smaller level, local sheriff's departments are the classic example...
People get mad, and they run out there and elect themselves a new one.
The actual sheriff is a "constitutional" elected official; however, the
embedded local government management structure as well as the police
unions interfacing with a judicial system which has vested interests in
more specific areas than are generally perceived by the public-at-large
are the real power - and boy-oh-boy, do they know this. Americans can't
assimilate past a 2-dimensional sound-bite... has to do with attention-spans,
fast-food, evolution and TV sets. TVs lost manual controls and the
population loses its collective mind... Co-incidence? I think NOT!
So keep yer tin foil hats handy, 'cause the mother-ship wants your money
and will eat your babies too while you're not even looking. And all the
while the parents will think they've gone off to military school until they
get a flag when the kids come home in coffins. Zombies, that's what we are
now, Zombies feeding the new world order.
So, just drink your Kool Aide; and if you wanna be happy, try the strawberry
flavor instead of the grape. Our insurrectionist Negro not only altered his
Kenyan birth certificate, but he got the Hawaiian government to change his
name from "Uncle Tom" to something more marketable and acceptable.
(PS: It's *all* probably NOT because Clinton got a blow-job... just in case
Fox News wants to weigh-in on the discussion.)
--
I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^; ;
and on the 'AWESOMENESS METER'
I am about two clicks better than 'TOTALLY'!
You should not view the world in terms
of things which you do - or do not - "like";
rather, you should view the world in terms
of how things "actually are", recognizing
and finding acceptance of them as such.
This would immeasurably bring *much* more
peace and tranquility into your life.
I could help you with that... but,
I really just don't like you that much.
Repent! The end is near.... So, smoke 'em if you got 'em.
philo
> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the ObamaRealChange
> [tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like the magic number is
> 30,not 42 as some would claim:
> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanistan
> _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>
> Meet the new boss
> Same as the old boss
>
> ^_^
>
yep
pentagon tells same old lie
be so much better if we got new lies
�n�hw��f
thought with news:7bcd9$4b245a0d$4831f3f2$16...@FUSE.NET:
IAWTP
That said, theres little reason to support the republic. Government
should fear its people, not the other way around.
�n�hw��f
news:IuGdnYl5pt2AnLjW...@ntd.net:
> �n�hw��f wrote:
>> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the
>> ObamaRealChange [tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like
>> the magic number is 30,not 42 as some would claim:
>> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanis
>> tan _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>>
>> Meet the new boss
>> Same as the old boss
>>
>> ^_^
>>
>
>
> yep
>
> pentagon tells same old lie
>
> be so much better if we got new lies
>
Because the people cant be trusted with the truth?
Hmmmm...
chuckcar
news:Xns9CDFA193CE4B1...@216.196.97.142:
> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the ObamaRealChange
> [tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like the magic number is
> 30,not 42 as some would claim:
> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanistan
> _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>
Missed the word estimate did you? considering that in each case the same
number of munitions quite likely were used, I fail to see how you could
come up with a better guess.
--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
�n�hw��f
news:Xns9CE08C7...@127.0.0.1:
> "�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CDFA193CE4B1...@216.196.97.142:
>
>> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the
>> ObamaRealChange [tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like
>> the magic number is 30,not 42 as some would claim:
>> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanis
>> tan _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>>
> Missed the word estimate did you? considering that in each case
> the same number of munitions quite likely were used, I fail to see
> how you could come up with a better guess.
>
The number is based upon the fact that numbers of casualties above 30
required signing off by Rumsfeld. This is a carry-over from the Bush
doctrine. So much for Obama being an agent of CHANGE.
LULZ!
chuckcar
> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> clouded the waters of pure thought with
> news:Xns9CE08C7...@127.0.0.1:
>
>> "�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns9CDFA193CE4B1...@216.196.97.142:
>>
>>> Gosh the parralells between the BushCo admin and the
>>> ObamaRealChange [tm] admin are increasingly apparent. Seems like
>>> the magic number is 30,not 42 as some would claim:
>>> http://www.alternet.org/world/144509/why_do_airstrikes_in_afghanis
>>> tan _keep_killing_exactly_30_people
>>>
>> Missed the word estimate did you? considering that in each case
>> the same number of munitions quite likely were used, I fail to see
>> how you could come up with a better guess.
>>
> The number is based upon the fact that numbers of casualties above 30
> required signing off by Rumsfeld. This is a carry-over from the Bush
> doctrine. So much for Obama being an agent of CHANGE.
> LULZ!
>
Do you have independant information that Rumsfeld did so and that it's
still done now? that article didn't mention that at all.
Aardvark
> "§nühw€£f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CE093504CD81...@216.196.97.142:
>
>> chuckcar <ch...@nil.car> clouded the waters of pure thought with
>> news:Xns9CE08C7...@127.0.0.1:
>> The number is based upon the fact that numbers of casualties above 30
>> required signing off by Rumsfeld. This is a carry-over from the Bush
>> doctrine. So much for Obama being an agent of CHANGE. LULZ!
>>
> Do you have independant information that Rumsfeld did so and that it's
> still done now? that article didn't mention that at all.
Read much?
"We don't know much about how it works, but in 2007, Marc Garlasco, the
Pentagon's former chief of high-value targeting, offered a glimpse when he
told Salon magazine that in 2003, "the magic number was 30." That meant
that if an attack was anticipated to kill more than 30 civilians, it
needed the explicit approval of then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
or President George W. Bush. If the expected civilian death toll was less
than 30, the strike could be OKd by the legal and military commanders on
the ground."
--
Like one that on a lonesome road Doth walk in fear and dread,
And having once turned round walks on, And turns no more his head,
Because he knows some frightful fiend Doth close behind him tread.
-Samuel Taylor Coleridge 'The Rime of the Ancient Mariner', 1797
thanatoid
news:Xns9CE05BF0F4E1A...@216.196.97.142:
<SNIP>
> That said, theres little reason to support the republic.
> Government should fear its people, not the other way
> around.
I recently got a copy (for fast general reference) of the 2009
Almanac or whatever it's called. It has the full text of the
constitution - which I have never read in its entirety.
The first 5 paragraphs or so basically spell out why all true
Americans should get rid of the government we have had for the
last 40 years as unconstitutional and against the people.
Sigh...
�n�hw��f
thought with news:Xns9CE0C6C31...@188.40.43.245:
> "�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9CE05BF0F4E1A...@216.196.97.142:
>
> <SNIP>
>
>> That said, theres little reason to support the republic.
>> Government should fear its people, not the other way
>> around.
>
> I recently got a copy (for fast general reference) of the 2009
> Almanac or whatever it's called. It has the full text of the
> constitution - which I have never read in its entirety.
>
> The first 5 paragraphs or so basically spell out why all true
> Americans should get rid of the government we have had for the
> last 40 years as unconstitutional and against the people.
>
> Sigh...
>
Everything that has a beginning has an end. Such experiments in
democracy usually only last 200 years, if that.
We'll ikely go through a stage where power continues to accrue to the
monied class and the related corporations, then, an upheaval with
either less freedom and representation (military coup) or an
experiment in true socialism. Hard to say.
thanatoid
news:maoci5hnn29hrk2sg...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:31:51 +0000 (UTC), thanatoid
> <wai...@the.exit.invalid> wrote, by way of
<SNIP>
>>I recently got a copy (for fast general reference) of the
>>2009 Almanac or whatever it's called. It has the full text
>>of the constitution - which I have never read in its
>>entirety.
>>
>>The first 5 paragraphs or so basically spell out why all
>>true Americans should get rid of the government we have had
>>for the last 40 years as unconstitutional and against the
>>people.
>>
>>Sigh...
>
> Gooberment ain't gonna give up/roll over without a really
> really nasty fight :-(
You don't say...
�n�hw��f
thought with news:Xns9CE17C578...@188.40.43.245:
> Manatee Memories <S...@the.REPLYTO.entry> wrote in
> news:maoci5hnn29hrk2sg...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:31:51 +0000 (UTC), thanatoid
>> <wai...@the.exit.invalid> wrote, by way of
>
> <SNIP>
>
>>>I recently got a copy (for fast general reference) of the
>>>2009 Almanac or whatever it's called. It has the full text
>>>of the constitution - which I have never read in its
>>>entirety.
>>>
>>>The first 5 paragraphs or so basically spell out why all
>>>true Americans should get rid of the government we have had
>>>for the last 40 years as unconstitutional and against the
>>>people.
>>>
>>>Sigh...
>>
>> Gooberment ain't gonna give up/roll over without a really
>> really nasty fight :-(
>
> You don't say...
>
Mr. Penchant -for-stating-the-obvious makes a guest appearance.
^_^