Bush is still behind the terrorism
philo
Bush let them go
he's still screwing us!
OldGringo38
Two Cents To The philo Post:
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-free/story?id=9434065
>
>
>
> Bush let them go
>
> he's still screwing us!
--
Old Gringo
Just West Of Nowhere
Enjoy Life And Live It To Its Fullest
http://www.NuBoy-Industries.com
philo
> In The Beginning God Created The Heavens And Earth, Then I Added My Two
> Cents To The philo Post:
>> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-free/story?id=9434065
>>
>>
>>
>> Bush let them go
>>
>> he's still screwing us!
> LOL he looks guilty whether he is or not.
>
Just blowing off some steam here.
Hard to believe the guy made it past security
(on second thought...not so hard to believe)
thought they were supposed to check for explosives
I'd prosecute the security team just as hard as the asshole with the bomb
Buffalo
If you can catch even 20%, most won't try to get through because it will tip
their hand.
It wasn't Bush's fault for releasing those two. it was his, and Cheney's
fault (entirely) for starting the war in Iraq, when they did.
Arrogance and Ignorance!!
Buffalo
PS: I hope Bush and Cheney get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,
and get to spend a lot of time with Bubba, in their cell(s). :)
philo
Though I agree with you
Bush and Cheney are not going to get prosecuted for anything
Man o man Nixon is looking better all the time
joevan
Cheney is a real ass hole. He says that Obama is making us more unsafe
when it was he and the shrub that made us so hated.
§nühw¤£f
People get tortured at GITMO, finally get released, seek revenge.
Go fig.
Or, its the perfect tool to ensure a steady supply of "radicals" to
justify the never-ending "war on terror".
Hmmm...I'd really suggest anyone who is still confused at this point to
research "War is a Racket".
FYI
HTH
HAND
--
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/22-10
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
NormanM
> I hope Bush and Cheney get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,
> and get to spend a lot of time with Bubba, in their cell(s). :)
What will the charges be?
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
NormanM
> Cheney is a real ass hole. He says that Obama is making us more unsafe
> when it was he and the shrub that made us so hated.
We were hated before Bush and Cheney.
philo
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:06:43 -0500, joevan wrote:
>
>> Cheney is a real ass hole. He says that Obama is making us more unsafe
>> when it was he and the shrub that made us so hated.
>
> We were hated before Bush and Cheney.
>
true
but they made things a lot worse
chuckcar
news:E5qdnZTy8p6wwKTW...@ntd.net:
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-
> free/story?id=9434065
>
>
> Bush let them go
>
> he's still screwing us!
>
Art therapy rehab program? WTF is that?
Hell, he let Bin Laden's *entire* family leave *after* the twin towers
collapsed. His only interest was in getting money for his VP's company
and the rest of his old boys network. You surely know that by now.
--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
chuckcar
news:h5od85w3286i$.dlg@on-line.service.invalid:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:45:16 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>
>> I hope Bush and Cheney get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
>> law, and get to spend a lot of time with Bubba, in their cell(s). :)
>
> What will the charges be?
>
Two feet of prima cord inserted after they both get "broken in".
NormanM
Seriously. If you are going to indict Bush and Cheney for anything, you
should also indict a wad of Congress Critters as co-conspirators. Bush
didn't do anything without Congressional consent.
chuckcar
news:ol4lj5hp9leubl9lgm1c3c8jd835b4q49l@6ax:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <ch...@nil.car>
> wrote, by way of <Xns9CF0BC8...@127.0.0.1>, in
> 24hoursupport.helpdesk -->::
> Two feet each?
>
Yes and maybe a little surprise tied off at the end. Just so they don't
lose the feeling afterwards and before it goes off.
chuckcar
news:pde45h1...@on-line.service.invalid:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar wrote:
>
>> NormanM <spamme...@immoral.invalid> wrote in
>> news:h5od85w3286i$.dlg@on-line.service.invalid:
>
>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:45:16 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>
>>>> I hope Bush and Cheney get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
>>>> law, and get to spend a lot of time with Bubba, in their cell(s).
>>>> :)
>
>>> What will the charges be?
>
>> Two feet of prima cord inserted after they both get "broken in".
>
> Seriously. If you are going to indict Bush and Cheney for anything,
> you should also indict a wad of Congress Critters as co-conspirators.
> Bush didn't do anything without Congressional consent.
>
Oh please. They had the party majority in both when he was first elected
and the president is king of his party.
chuckcar
news:ml4lj55ecpei83k9e...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:33:23 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar <ch...@nil.car>
> wrote:
>
>>Hell, he let Bin Laden's *entire* family leave *after* the twin towers
>>collapsed. His only interest was in getting money for his VP's company
>>and the rest of his old boys network. You surely know that by now.
>
> *sigh*
>
> http://www.snopes.com/rumors/flights.asp
Then they got conned. They left on their own private plane. The only
plane to leave US airspace that day.It's been widely reported in the
press ever since. Including "The Fifth Estate" and "Sixty Minutes". Some
web site can't possibly have near that credibility or confirmation. I
notice they just quote the report verbatim. Far from investigative
journalism.
OldGringo38
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:45:16 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>
>> I hope Bush and Cheney get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,
>> and get to spend a lot of time with Bubba, in their cell(s). :)
>
> What will the charges be?
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II1zAObtwlM
§nühw¤£f
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:39:11 -0800, NormanM
> <spamme...@immoral.invalid> wrote, by way of
> <pde45h1...@on-line.service.invalid>, in 24hoursupport.helpdesk
> -->::
>
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:33:28 +0000 (UTC), chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>> NormanM <spamme...@immoral.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:h5od85w3286i$.dlg@on-line.service.invalid:
>>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:45:16 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>>>>> I hope Bush and Cheney get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
>>>>> law, and get to spend a lot of time with Bubba, in their cell(s). :)
>>>> What will the charges be?
>>> Two feet of prima cord inserted after they both get "broken in".
>> Seriously. If you are going to indict Bush and Cheney for anything, you
>> should also indict a wad of Congress Critters as co-conspirators. Bush
>> didn't do anything without Congressional consent.
>
> He kept going on & on and.... until getting what he wanted (which was so
> close to a Declaration of War as possible).
>
I think the quote from Goerhing (sp?) is applicable where he states that
its easy to stir up support if you follow his Patriot Recipie.
Heh...Nationalism.
^_^
NormanM
> Dubya positively *badgered* Congress until they (figuratively) "broke".
> He kept going on & on and.... until getting what he wanted (which was so
> close to a Declaration of War as possible).
Why did they "break"? They hold the power. Perhaps they didn't "break" so
much as they took an opportunity to "break" him? At the expense of "The
People", of course.
NormanM
> Oh please. They had the party majority in both when he was first elected
> and the president is king of his party.
Not always. Not in a Federal Republic.
But regardless, any Congressional consent given to a president makes those
Congress persons who give such consent co-conspirators.
There were a handful of Republicans (6 Senators, 1 Represntative) who voted
against the Iraq war, and a double fistful of Democrats (82 Senators, 29
Senators) who voted for it. That would be a total of 263 Republicans, and
111 Democrats who should be co-indicted along with Bush and Cheney.
Barack Obama was not, yet, a Senator when the vote on the Iraq War
Resolution took place. But subsequent Senate votes he made do not clearly
indicate that he would have been a "no" vote.
Buffalo
philo wrote:
>
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-free/story?id=9434065
>
>
> Bush let them go
>
> he's still screwing us!
From
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/30/raw-data-gitmo-detainees-returned-terrorism/
An update on what happened to some of the Gitmo released prisioners:
Abu Sufyan al-Azdi al-Shihri. He was repatriated to Saudi Arabia in late
2007 and later emerged as a leadership figure with Al Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula. He was reported killed in a recent attack on Al Qaeda strongholds
in Yemen, claims that have been disputed by family members.
Mazin Salih Musaid al-Alawi al-Awfi. He too was repatriated to Saudi Arabia
in 2007 and then emerged as a leadership figure with Al Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula before turning himself in to Yemeni authorities in February.
Abdullah Saleh Ali al-Ajmi. He was returned to Kuwait in 2005 and in April
2008 conducted a suicide bombing in Mosul, Iraq, which killed many Iraqi
citizens.
Ibrahim bin Shakaran and Mohammed Bin Ahmad Mizouz. These two Moroccans were
returned to their home country in 2004, only to be convicted in 2007 for
involvement in trying to recruit fellow Moroccans for Al Qaeda in Iraq.
Ibrahim Shafir Sen. He was returned to his home country of Turkey in 2003,
and was arrested in the Turkish city of Van in early 2008. He was indicted
for being a leader of Al Qaeda cells in Van.
Ravil Shafeyavich Gumarov and Timur Ravilich Ishmurat. These two Russian
were returned to their home country in 2004 and were arrested the next year
by Russian authorities for involvement in a gas line bombing. They were both
convicted in 2006.
Said Mohammed Alim Shah. He was repatriated to his home country of
Afghanistan in 2004 and was said to have directed a suicide attack in 2007
that killed 31. He also kidnapped two Chinese engineers in 2004 and claimed
responsibility for a hotel bombing in Islamabad. He blew himself up in 2007
to avoid capture.
Mohammed Ismail. He was returned to his home country of Afghanistan in 2004
and was recaptured months later for involvement in an attack on U.S. forces
near Kandahar.
Yousef Muhammed Yaaqoub. He was repatriated to Afghanistan in 2003 and
quickly joined back with the Taliban as a commander. He reportedly aided a
jailbreak in Kandahar and was killed in 2004.
Abdullah Majid al-Naimi. He was repatriated to his home country of Bahrain
in 2005 and arrested in 2008. He is known to have associated with Al Qaeda.
Majid Abdullah Lahiq al Joudi. He was returned to his home country of Saudi
Arabia in 2007 and is said to have since aided terrorists.
Zahir Shah. He was repatriated to Afghanistan in 2007 and has participated
in terrorist training since.
Shah Mohammed. He was returned to Pakistan in 2003 and was later killed
fighting U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
Suspected Cases
Ruslan Anatolivich Odijev. He was repatriated to Russia in 2004. Russian
authorities said he was involved in several terrorist attacks including one
in 2005 that killed police officers in the Caucasus region. He was killed in
battle in 2007.
Sabi Jahn Abdul Ghafour. He was returned to his home country of Afghanistan
in 2003 and reportedly became a regional commander for the Taliban. He was
killed during fighting with Afghan forces in 2004.
Mohammed Nayim Farouq. He was repatriated to Afghanistan in 2003, and
renewed contact with the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
Abdullah Kafkas. He was returned to Russia in 2004. He is suspected of being
involved in an attack on a police checkpoint in 2005.
Almasm Rabilavich Sharipov. He was returned to Russia in 2004 and has since
associated with the terrorist group Hezb-e-Tahrir.
Abdullah Ghofoor. He was repatriated to Afghanistan in 2004 and became a
suspected Taliban commander. After planning attacks on U.S. and Afghan
forces, he was killed in a raid.
Saad Madhi Saad Hawash al Azmi. He was returned to Kuwait in 2005 and is
suspected of associating with Al Qaeda.
Isa Khan. He was returned to Pakistan in 2004 and later associated with a
group called Tehrik-i-Taliban.
Muhibullah. He was repatriated to Afghanistan in 2005 and later associated
with the Taliban.
Humud Dakhil Humud Said al-Jadan. He was returned to Saudi Arabia in 2007
and is thought to have associated with known terrorists.
Abd al Razzaq Abdallah Ibrahim al-Sharikh. He was returned to Saudi Arabia
in 2007 and was arrested a year later for supporting terrorism.
Abdullah Gulam Rasoul. He was repatriated to Afghanistan in 2007 and is
thought to have become a Taliban commander who organized an attack on U.S.
aircraft.
Haji Sahib Rohullah Wakil. He was returned to Afghanistan in 2008 and has
since associated with terrorist groups.
Buffalo
Buffalo
With 200 grain PC, no surprise at the end would be needed.
Buffalo
PS: I think Bubba would be sufficient without and need for explosives.
Aardvark
> philo wrote:
>>
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-
free/story?id=9434065
>>
>>
>> Bush let them go
>>
>> he's still screwing us!
>
>
> From
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/30/raw-data-gitmo-detainees-
returned-terrorism/
>
> An update on what happened to some of the Gitmo released prisioners:
>
> SNIP interesting info on subsequent careers of ex-Gitmo detainees.
Well, whether or not they were radical al-Qaeda operatives before Gitmo,
they certainly were afterwards. I wonder what might have caused that.
--
Las autoridades sanitarias advierten:
Fumar perjudica gravemente su salud
y la de los que están a su alrededor
§nühw¤£f
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:48:07 -0700, "Buffalo" <Er...@nada.com.invalid>
> wrote, by way of <hhg3p4$6e7$1...@news.eternal-september.org>, in
> 24hoursupport.helpdesk -->::
>
>>
>> philo wrote:
>> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-free/story?id=9434065
>>>
>>> Bush let them go
>>>
>>> he's still screwing us!
>>
>> From
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/30/raw-data-gitmo-detainees-returned-terrorism/
>>
>> An update on what happened to some of the Gitmo released prisioners:
>
> A rarely-heard option is as follows.
>
> Capture them, spirit them away to an undisclosed location, "aggressively
> interview", then quietly execute. No muss, no fuss, and _certainly_
> *not* having to face them *_ever_* again.
>
> Santa Anna (http://preview.tinyurl.com/ykcl7gl) had it right when
> proclaiming "If I kill my enemies today I will not have to fight them
> tomorrow" (paraphrase[d] here; I don't recall the exact quote).
>
You dumb fuck. You think "dissapearing" people ala some banana republic
dictator would somehow magically "solve" americas problems?
BUAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You cant kill a meme, dipshit.
Feel free to continue to NOT comprehend the concepts I present.
§nühw¤£f
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:48:07 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>
>> philo wrote:
>> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-
> free/story?id=9434065
>>>
>>> Bush let them go
>>>
>>> he's still screwing us!
>>
>> From
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/30/raw-data-gitmo-detainees-
> returned-terrorism/
>> An update on what happened to some of the Gitmo released prisioners:
>>
>
>> SNIP interesting info on subsequent careers of ex-Gitmo detainees.
>
>
> Well, whether or not they were radical al-Qaeda operatives before Gitmo,
> they certainly were afterwards. I wonder what might have caused that.
>
hanging".
FYI
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:48:07 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>>
>>> philo wrote:
>>> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-
>> free/story?id=9434065
>>>>
>>>> Bush let them go
>>>>
>>>> he's still screwing us!
>>>
>>> From
>>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/30/raw-data-gitmo-detainees-
>> returned-terrorism/
>>> An update on what happened to some of the Gitmo released prisioners:
>>>
>>>
>>> SNIP interesting info on subsequent careers of ex-Gitmo detainees.
>>
>>
>> Well, whether or not they were radical al-Qaeda operatives before
>> Gitmo, they certainly were afterwards. I wonder what might have caused
>> that.
>>
> G00gle the technique the Israelis perfected sometime: "palestinian
> hanging".
>
> FYI
I call it 'The John McCain'.
FYI
:-)
chuckcar
news:nhk7kh35...@on-line.service.invalid:
I'm not going to go along with revisionist history. There was strong
objection to it at the time, but with numerous lies - including to his
own Secretary of State - and pretty much any way he could, Scrub,
Buckshot Dick and Wolfie *were* going to get their way or they'd
turn purple protesting their point of view.
In any case the reasons given were mostly lies anyways, like Saddam
having chemical weapons - the ones he did have had passed their useful
date, or having nuclear weapons from Africa. Of all the places to claim
you're getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less
likely. It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to
the sunis with help from Iran.
§nühw¤£f
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:20:14 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:48:07 -0700, Buffalo wrote:
>>>
>>>> philo wrote:
>>>> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-
>>> free/story?id=9434065
>>>>> Bush let them go
>>>>>
>>>>> he's still screwing us!
>>>> From
>>>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/30/raw-data-gitmo-detainees-
>>> returned-terrorism/
>>>> An update on what happened to some of the Gitmo released prisioners:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SNIP interesting info on subsequent careers of ex-Gitmo detainees.
>>>
>>> Well, whether or not they were radical al-Qaeda operatives before
>>> Gitmo, they certainly were afterwards. I wonder what might have caused
>>> that.
>>>
>> G00gle the technique the Israelis perfected sometime: "palestinian
>> hanging".
>>
>> FYI
>
> I call it 'The John McCain'.
>
> FYI
>
> :-)
>
restrained position whereas "palestinian hanging" involves being
restrained from a wall or often the top bunk in a cell. that way gravity
does the work of the torturing party for them.
How convienient.
Aardvark
> Of all the places to claim you're
> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely. It
> was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the sunis
> with help from Iran.
And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray tell?
§nühw¤£f
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>
>> Of all the places to claim you're
>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely. It
>> was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the sunis
>> with help from Iran.
>
> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray tell?
>
ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely.
>>> It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the
>>> sunis with help from Iran.
>>
>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray tell?
>>
> <falls outta chair laughing>
>
> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
I'm still waiting for his reply. Should I hold my breath?
The Old Sourdough
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely.
>>>> It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the
>>>> sunis with help from Iran.
>>>
>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray tell?
>>>
>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>
>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
> I'm still waiting for his reply. Should I hold my breath?
Are you turning blue yet?
--
The Old Sourdough
No Microsoft products were used in any way for the creation of this
message. If you are using a Microsoft product to view it, BEWARE! - I'm
not responsible for any harm you might encounter as a result.
Respondant
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>
>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less
>>> likely. It was just a matter of time before his regime fell
>>> probably to the sunis with help from Iran.
>>
>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray
>> tell?
> <falls outta chair laughing>
>
> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
<looks up at subject line>
<wonders IF/WHEN everything that's wrong in the world transfers to the Obama
administration>
§nühw¤£f
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:48:39 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely.
>>>> It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the
>>>> sunis with help from Iran.
>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray tell?
>>>
>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>
>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
>
> I'm still waiting for his reply. Should I hold my breath?
>
^_^
§nühw¤£f
Nice strawman though.
^_^
Ahlstrom is a <Plonk> pussy.
> Aardvark mumbled in 24hoursupport.helpdesk:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:48:39 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely.
>>>>> It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the
>>>>> sunis with help from Iran.
>>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray tell?
>>>>
>>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>>
>>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
>
>> I'm still waiting for his reply. Should I hold my breath?
>
> Are you turning blue yet?
>
Look at you old ass kisser, you pucker-up your lips well before your
plant them on Hovark's ass. :)
Respondant
> Respondant wrote:
>> �n�hw��f wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less
>>>>> likely. It was just a matter of time before his regime fell
>>>>> probably to the sunis with help from Iran.
>>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray
>>>> tell?
>>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>>
>>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
>>
>> <looks up at subject line>
>>
>> <wonders IF/WHEN everything that's wrong in the world transfers to
>> the Obama administration>
>>
> Wy would it?
Oh, I dunno. How about trillions of taxpaying citizens money going to pork
and raping medicare? I don't recall either HW, or W having a hand in any of
that, do you?
> Nice strawman though.
Really? Where? All I did was ask a question.
So when does the responsibility shift form Bush to Obama? 2 years
in? Three years in? Never?
The Old Sourdough
Now Duh-ane, you've really got to stop following people around. It's
becoming painfully apparent that you're just not very good at "The
dozens". You just keep repeating the same old tired stuff.
Ahlstrom is a <Plonk> pussy.
<snipped>
You're old and a worthless ass kisser. You can go find Hovark and kiss
her ass and be happy.
The Old Sourdough
><snipped>
See, there ya go rerpeating yourself (again).
Ahlstrom is a <Plonk> pussy.
> Ahlstrom is a <Plonk> pussy. mumbled in 24hoursupport.helpdesk:
>> The Old Sourdough wrote:
>
>
>> <snipped>
>
>> You're old and a worthless ass kisser. You can go find Hovark and kiss
>> her ass and be happy.
>
> See, there ya go rerpeating yourself (again).
>
You can find some drawls to kiss then. Maybe your own?
The Old Sourdough
Sorry, Duh-ane, but I don't have a drawl, more of a
Northeast twang.
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:48:39 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely.
>>>>> It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the
>>>>> sunis with help from Iran.
>>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray
>>>> tell?
>>>>
>>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>>
>>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
>>
>> I'm still waiting for his reply. Should I hold my breath?
>>
> No, the feckless can't be given sufficient feck to become the feckful.
>
> ^_^
OK. Feck him, then.
§nühw¤£f
> �n�hw��f wrote:
>> Respondant wrote:
>>> �n�hw��f wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less
>>>>>> likely. It was just a matter of time before his regime fell
>>>>>> probably to the sunis with help from Iran.
>>>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray
>>>>> tell?
>>>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>>>
>>>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
>>> <looks up at subject line>
>>>
>>> <wonders IF/WHEN everything that's wrong in the world transfers to
>>> the Obama administration>
>>>
>> Wy would it?
>
> Oh, I dunno. How about trillions of taxpaying citizens money going to pork
Hilaroius. A invasion of another country under false pretenses
represents the biggest pork project ever.
It paid off the companies that helped select BushCo. And now we have
Blackwater getting off scot free after murdering unarmed Iraqi
NON-combatants.
And Cheneys fuckup company Halliburton was in the red until he became VP
and could shuttle BILLIONS in gubmint contracts to them.
Want more, you klewless fucknuckle?
> and raping medicare? I don't recall either HW, or W having a hand in any of
> that, do you?
>
Rethugs have been *against* medicare from the get-go. Really sparkles,
you dont want me to dish on you here. I tend to destroy my opponents in
this subject.
Jus Sayin[tm]
>> Nice strawman though.
>
> Really? Where? All I did was ask a question.
>
Leading question with unspoken implications which you now attempt to
(failingly) backpeddal from.
<snicker>
> So when does the responsibility shift form Bush to Obama? 2 years
> in? Three years in? Never?
>
When he and his cohorts start *writing* and *implementing* the legislation.
Not when he's operating under the laws and decisions set up by BushCo,
you gormless cuntflap.
Your turn, bitch.
§nühw¤£f
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:26:21 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:48:39 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +0000, chuckcar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of all the places to claim you're
>>>>>> getting processed uranium from, I can think of no place less likely.
>>>>>> It was just a matter of time before his regime fell probably to the
>>>>>> sunis with help from Iran.
>>>>> And why would Iran have supported a Sunni uprising in Iraq, pray
>>>>> tell?
>>>>>
>>>> <falls outta chair laughing>
>>>>
>>>> ZOMG! Thats pure chucky!
>>> I'm still waiting for his reply. Should I hold my breath?
>>>
>> No, the feckless can't be given sufficient feck to become the feckful.
>>
>> ^_^
>
> OK. Feck him, then.
>
I bet he didn't even check.
Aardvark
>> and raping medicare? I don't recall either HW, or W having a hand in
>> any of that, do you?
>>
> Rethugs have been *against* medicare from the get-go. Really sparkles,
> you dont want me to dish on you here. I tend to destroy my opponents in
> this subject.
> Jus Sayin[tm]
You'd have a fucking field day over in scorched earth, mate.
§nühw¤£f
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:22:30 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>
>>> and raping medicare? I don't recall either HW, or W having a hand in
>>> any of that, do you?
>>>
>> Rethugs have been *against* medicare from the get-go. Really sparkles,
>> you dont want me to dish on you here. I tend to destroy my opponents in
>> this subject.
>> Jus Sayin[tm]
>
>
> You'd have a fucking field day over in scorched earth, mate.
>
>
alt.machines.cnc...full of redneck dopes.
Aardvark
> Aardvark wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:22:30 -0700, §nühw¤£f wrote:
>>
>>>> and raping medicare? I don't recall either HW, or W having a hand in
>>>> any of that, do you?
>>>>
>>> Rethugs have been *against* medicare from the get-go. Really sparkles,
>>> you dont want me to dish on you here. I tend to destroy my opponents
>>> in this subject.
>>> Jus Sayin[tm]
>>
>>
>> You'd have a fucking field day over in scorched earth, mate.
>>
>>
> Must be like talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism and
> alt.machines.cnc...full of redneck dopes.
>
> ^_^
Yup! Got it in one, mate.
Respondant
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:12:30 -0700, �n�hw��f wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:22:30 -0700, �n�hw��f wrote:
>>>
>>>>> and raping medicare? I don't recall either HW, or W having a
>>>>> hand in any of that, do you?
>>>>>
>>>> Rethugs have been *against* medicare from the get-go. Really
>>>> sparkles, you dont want me to dish on you here. I tend to destroy
>>>> my opponents in this subject.
>>>> Jus Sayin[tm]
>>>
>>>
>>> You'd have a fucking field day over in scorched earth, mate.
>>>
>>>
>> Must be like talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism and
>> alt.machines.cnc...full of redneck dopes.
>>
>> ^_^
>
> Yup! Got it in one, mate.
I really love the assumptions libtards make. Looking forward to this years
elections in which every seat in the US house, along with 1/3 of the senate
are up for grabs.
Bill
NormanM
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:12:30 -0700, �n�hw��f wrote:
>> Must be like talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism and
>> alt.machines.cnc...full of redneck dopes.
>>
>> ^_^
> Yup! Got it in one, mate.
You know, what surprises me is that nobody who hates Republicans, Rednecks,
and Gun Nuts has the nerve to propose making membership a capital offense. I
suppose y'all "tolerant" folks need somebody to rag on, and blame your
failures on. ;)
And have a Happy New Year!
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
§nühw¤£f
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:21:13 +0000 (UTC), Aardvark wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:12:30 -0700, �n�hw��f wrote:
>
>>> Must be like talk.politics.guns,misc.survivalism and
>>> alt.machines.cnc...full of redneck dopes.
>>>
>>> ^_^
>
>> Yup! Got it in one, mate.
>
> You know, what surprises me is that nobody who hates Republicans, Rednecks,
> and Gun Nuts has the nerve to propose making membership a capital offense.
So you have some sort of death wish thats going unfilfilled?
Interesting.
> I
> suppose y'all "tolerant" folks need somebody to rag on, and blame your
> failures on. ;)
>
I blame the fucking spineless sell-out Dems who promise real meaningful
change and then dont *deliver*. Well, they *do* deliver. They deliver to
their corporate masters.
> And have a Happy New Year!
>
No fucking chance of that. And I too predict a massive blowback against
the Dems who dissapointed their base.
Fuck the whole sorry assed lot of em.
§nühw¤£f
thus far. All they can do is piss and moan and repeat "NO".
Thats not fucking solving the nations problems you gormless fucknuckle.