1858 playtest discussion

The files are no longer available... Ian D On 15 January 2014 17:49, Ian D <ianwil...@btinternet.

http://ranchochico.com/ofltn/juypztpguhvv.html -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------

Here are the latest 1858 files - main changes are: 60% share limit and two-stage income on privates.

Ian, Ah, okay, lights go on. I was trying to apply the default 1830 rules of keeping the privates

FWIW the definition originated with Federico Vellani, who had H-trains in his 1827Jr prototype. In

Ian, In rules version 7 I was reading about Private Companies laying tiles. Your example #2 about

hi ian yes, i agree your triples. but the last one is deffo a lose situation, i think..... 60% limit

FWIW I always felt that the start mechanism posed this sort of problem, but I could never figure out

Comments below: --- On Mon, 15/8/11, Bob <Hza...@aol.com> wrote: >another playtest, new

--- On Mon, 8/8/11, Bob <Hza...@aol.com> wrote: >Playtest feedback from the two conventions

--- On Mon, 1/8/11, john boocock <john...@yahoo.com> wrote: From: john boocock <johnlner@

We played a three player game with the new map and privates. Only four grey trains were bought, so

--- On Sun, 26/6/11, Dave4B <walama...@o2.co.uk> wrote: >The 6H/3M trains still say

Dave, Rule 9.10 says "Phase 5 starts on the purchase of the first 5E/4M Train. At the start of

--- On Sun, 6/3/11, Jon Draper <jdr...@f2s.com> wrote: >In both the game this week and last

Scott Petersen wrote: > If you click on the tile image, it brings up a bigger version of it >

--- On Wed, 23/2/11, Ralf Menzel <men...@ls6.cs.uni-dortmund.de> wrote: >> Better luck

I've shared 1858TrainsSJT.pdf Message from ianwil...@btinternet.com: Here are some better

--- On Thu, 10/2/11, Dave Berry <da...@berrybental.me.uk> wrote: >On the 18xx list, a couple

Steve, Thanks for the feedback. I'll fix these at the next release. Ian D --- On Tue, 8/2/11,

I've shared 1858_zip_20110207.zip Message from ianwil...@btinternet.com: This upload includes

I've now finished two (solitaire) play-throughs to try out the new map (with Lisbon improved).

You are essentially both correct. "Not according to the normal rules" might have been more

> So I have a choice between utility and geography. Any thoughts? Unless it gives someone an undue

On 26/01/2011 22:54, Ian D wrote: > Those of you who have managed to look at the map may have

It used to be 1 pound = 250 pesetas. Carlos On Jan 16, 3:26 pm, Ian D Wilson <ianwilson...@

--- On Wed, 26/1/11, Dave4B <walama...@o2.co.uk> wrote: >Just to clarify: the port is

I've shared Scott's_Tiles_Redraw_2011_01_24.pdf Message from ianwil...@btinternet.com:

I've shared Scott's_Charters_ Redraw_2011_01_22.pdf Click to open: Scott's_Charters_

This is indeed an option, but it might look odd if Lisbon was worth a lot more than Madrid and