Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Group info
Members: 128
Language: English
Group categories:
Other
Society > Government
More group info »
Home

This Group, sponsored by the USFSPA Liberation Support Group (ULSG, LLC) , supports the rights of all military service members, active-duty/retired/Guard & Reserve military members, Commissioned Corps of the US Public Health Service, and Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in challenging the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act (USFSPA), PL 97-252, 96 Stat. 730 (1982), currently codified as amended  at 10 U.S.C. § 1408.

 

This site was established to post correspondence exchanges between military veterans and their state and federally elected officials as well as inform veterans about The USFSPA. 


Military veterans are requesting Congress review the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA) enacted in 1982 because the law is outdated and has become obsolete and unnecessary.  A critical review would indicate its repeal is warranted.  This federal divorce law pertains only to uniformed military personnel, not to any other government branch, agency or department.  Replies from Congressional officials will more often than not portray an indifference and neglect of concerns of the military veteran.  Yet, in that elected officials have sworn an oath to support and defend the nation and the interests of the armed forces, they must be held accountable to this trust and responsibility.


Pages2 of 6 pages view all »
Last updated by CRUTCHJC - Jun 20 - 1 author - 8 pages long
Last updated by CRUTCHJC - Jun 21 - 1 author - 2 pages long
Discussions7 of 1092 messages view all »
Article in my (todays) local newspaper--Not good news for our deployed military members
By 2ndwife_to_a_retired_smsgt - Nov 28 - 1 author - 0 replies
Military Divorce News
By SFCPEREZ - Nov 28 - 1 author - 0 replies
Title 10 USC 1408 FW: OUTSTANDING CONGRESSIONAL TRACKER
By DON HOLLAND - Nov 26 - 2 authors - 1 reply
on to appellate court
By slmjoyner - Nov 21 - 1 author - 1 reply
Title 10 USC 1408 Retainer pay for service
By Jack C. Crutchfield - Nov 27 - 3 authors - 2 replies
How do I make it stop
By 8man - Nov 23 - 1 author - 0 replies
First Court Battle Won
By slmjoyner - Nov 6 - 1 author - 0 replies
Files1 of 394 files view all »
Last updated by slmjoyner - Nov 18

Report this group   XML       Send email to this group: 10usc1408@googlegroups.com
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google