Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
The relation of Passphrases to Private Keys
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Aaron Hastings  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options May 29 2012, 10:01 am
From: Aaron Hastings <aa...@091labs.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:01:41 +0100
Local: Tues, May 29 2012 10:01 am
Subject: The relation of Passphrases to Private Keys

Hi all,

Posting once again to both lists as I figure this is of interest to either
party. This is another one about encryption.

I'm curious about the relationship between a passphrase and a private key
when it comes to GPG/PGP encryption. Does a passphrase affect a private
key's eventual value when creating said key, or are the two completely
separate? I know that, with GnuPG on Linux, the output asks the user to
perform various tasks (disk I/O, mouse movements, etc.) to guarantee
ultimate "randomness" during the generation process, but is the chosen
passphrase also tied into the generation algorithm?

Further to that, when it comes to selecting a new passphrase down the road
- is it better practise to delete the existing key and generate a new one
with a different passphrase (after ensuring the existing key is no longer
needed, of course), or to just edit the passphrase using: *gpg --edit-key*?

This whole field is new to me and it's evident that even the slightest slip
of the mind or lapse of judgement can compromise your entire efforts.

Aaron


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Duncan Thomas  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options May 29 2012, 11:37 am
From: Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:37:08 +0100
Local: Tues, May 29 2012 11:37 am
Subject: Re: [091labs-public] The relation of Passphrases to Private Keys
You can add a passphrase to a private key after generating the
keypair, and the public key is still valid.

On 29 May 2012 15:01, Aaron Hastings <aa...@091labs.com> wrote:

--
Duncan Thomas

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »